Just to start, this is about guitars. The shred genre, to be specific. In case you don't know, "shred" is defined as highly technically proficient guitar playing that is more based in showmanship than anything else. I will also be discussing why I think it is one of the best genres of rock and music in general. Before we begin, go into YouTube and type in "shred" or "shred solo" or anything like that. Watch a video and read the comments then come back. (here's a good one if your too lazy to look: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2JlKzMokv0 )
Go ahead. I'll wait.
Read the comments.
A decent 1/3 of them were about how the shred genre sucks dick, right?
Right.
Maybe they're correct when they say that.
I like to disagree with that, and this is my thinking behind that:
The most common argument for saying that shred sucks is that "it lacks emotion" or "its just a guy playing fast but putting no soul into it". Seriously. Look back at those comments again. But really, what the hell does that even mean? He lacks emotion? So, what, because he's playing fast and not putting quite as many bends in there its not emotional or in any way channeling the players thoughts? There is something a bit wrong with that statement. It's sort of like saying its not quite a pie because it doesn't have enough apples and there isn't any whipped cream.
Really, this ridiculous idea of playing needing emotion stems from something: We have, as an audience, forgotten what the purpose of music is. You might say it is to fill in the emotional stimulation people need. I will say, however, that if you say that you are wrong. The purpose of music is, and always will be, to ENTERTAIN. Let me ask you, when was the last time you listened to a song because you wanted to be entertained and not just to have some background noise while you work?
With that in mind, think about this: what genre's of music do you hate? Rap? Techno? Rock? Metal? I used to tell myself I would never get into any of this modern hip-hop/rap/r&b stuff, but eventually I did find some songs I liked. I didn't like these songs because they were good or because they filled some emotional void. I liked them because, well, they were pretty damn fun to listen to. Which is why I always tell myself now: No genre of music is inherently BAD. Only the song can be bad.
So, how does the shred sub-genre of rock and metal fit into this? Well, it is, first and foremost, a genre COMPLETELY focused on entertainment. It is a genre based around showmanship and competition. As I'm sure were all aware, flashiness and competition are peoples favorite things to watch (the Super Bowl, for example, features live music and shows as well as an intense showdown between the two best teams in the league). When someone watches it, they are going "wow, holy shit that is FAST" in their head. Never mind the slow, emotional stuff; This guy on the screen is playing a DOUBLE GUITAR HOLY SHIT THAT IS AWESOME ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rutyA12z3Ok ).
Of course there are bad examples of shred. The guys that just aren't that good or songs that don't make you say "damn, that is badass" will always be there. But isn't this true of every genre? Hits and misses?
And by no means am I saying that slow, emotional stuff is worse than shred. I would surely listen to Dave Gilmour before I have to listen to Yngwie Malmsteen and I would definitely put Hendrix over Satriani; I'm just saying that emotion is not what its all about.
Thoughts? Disagree?
(Keep in mind that the whole thing about entertainment can be applied to any music genre. If it is entertaining it is good. No questions asked.)
Go ahead. I'll wait.
Read the comments.
A decent 1/3 of them were about how the shred genre sucks dick, right?
Right.
Maybe they're correct when they say that.
I like to disagree with that, and this is my thinking behind that:
The most common argument for saying that shred sucks is that "it lacks emotion" or "its just a guy playing fast but putting no soul into it". Seriously. Look back at those comments again. But really, what the hell does that even mean? He lacks emotion? So, what, because he's playing fast and not putting quite as many bends in there its not emotional or in any way channeling the players thoughts? There is something a bit wrong with that statement. It's sort of like saying its not quite a pie because it doesn't have enough apples and there isn't any whipped cream.
Really, this ridiculous idea of playing needing emotion stems from something: We have, as an audience, forgotten what the purpose of music is. You might say it is to fill in the emotional stimulation people need. I will say, however, that if you say that you are wrong. The purpose of music is, and always will be, to ENTERTAIN. Let me ask you, when was the last time you listened to a song because you wanted to be entertained and not just to have some background noise while you work?
With that in mind, think about this: what genre's of music do you hate? Rap? Techno? Rock? Metal? I used to tell myself I would never get into any of this modern hip-hop/rap/r&b stuff, but eventually I did find some songs I liked. I didn't like these songs because they were good or because they filled some emotional void. I liked them because, well, they were pretty damn fun to listen to. Which is why I always tell myself now: No genre of music is inherently BAD. Only the song can be bad.
So, how does the shred sub-genre of rock and metal fit into this? Well, it is, first and foremost, a genre COMPLETELY focused on entertainment. It is a genre based around showmanship and competition. As I'm sure were all aware, flashiness and competition are peoples favorite things to watch (the Super Bowl, for example, features live music and shows as well as an intense showdown between the two best teams in the league). When someone watches it, they are going "wow, holy shit that is FAST" in their head. Never mind the slow, emotional stuff; This guy on the screen is playing a DOUBLE GUITAR HOLY SHIT THAT IS AWESOME ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rutyA12z3Ok ).
Of course there are bad examples of shred. The guys that just aren't that good or songs that don't make you say "damn, that is badass" will always be there. But isn't this true of every genre? Hits and misses?
And by no means am I saying that slow, emotional stuff is worse than shred. I would surely listen to Dave Gilmour before I have to listen to Yngwie Malmsteen and I would definitely put Hendrix over Satriani; I'm just saying that emotion is not what its all about.
Thoughts? Disagree?
(Keep in mind that the whole thing about entertainment can be applied to any music genre. If it is entertaining it is good. No questions asked.)