Well that would mean by extension that your argument that all arguments are nothing more than coercive tactics would imply that your own argument is nothing more than a coercive tactic. If you're saying that your own argument has no truth-value or validity to it, then why should I believe you?Combine Rustler said:Arguing evolved so that one human can more effectively coerce the other into doing what they want to do. Not joking. How true or correct your argument is is completely irrelevant. Only thing that matters is that you can enforce your will without resorting to outright violence.
And yes, humans can be reprogrammed like that. Do not think that you, me, or anyone else is anything more than a complex organic machine.
i think it's neccesary that we assume that man at least has some power to stumble upon the truth through his intellect. To assume otherwise would lead us into a pit of contradiction and the deepest skepticism.