Rule 34 is evil. I was talking to one of my friends and he made a joke about having a fetish for speaking in third person. Would that not be the most disturbingly akward thing to be rule 34'd?
My Mind is Broken
- Thread starter Panzer_God
- Start date
Recommended Videos
How are we supposed to discuss this really? No, I can think of more awkward things to be "rule 34'd".
Its the best way to hurt someone who adores the Disney films. Yeah I'm a bad person but it was hilarious just to see her face when she saw them, that'll teach you to make me watch The Little Mermaid 5 times, mahahahahaha.
I'm a little curious if we are supposed to get what you are talking about. I looked up rule 34 on google and am under the impression rule 34 is that everyone can be related to sex.
Anyways, it certainly seems to be true.
Anyways, it certainly seems to be true.
Rule 34 states that if it exists, there is porn of it.Captain Pancake said:
It's both revered and hated because, although it can create some hilarious porn like foot fetish porn, it can also create really creepy porn, like... well foot fetish porn. (ha im so funny)
The whole rules of the internet thing came originally from some anon on 4chans /b/, they have changed many times but 34 has always remained on the various lists.
If you want to know more google encyclopaedia dramatica rule 34, but I warn you, that shit ain't pretty.
I know the feeling, this is only the latest in creepy things from them.The Blue Mongoose said:
Oh you are a cruel cruel person. Disney should always remain undefiled. At least the old stuff, I don't care about the new stuff.George144 said:
You're explaining it wrong!bodyklok said:
Foot fetish porn? I'm sure that was around long before the internet and has nothing to do with Rule 34. Calvin and Hobbes porn would be a more appropirate example.
I saw that on Encyclopedia Dramatica. I immediately proceeded to wash my eyes and try to not vomit all over my keyboard. All my childhood memories of reading that comic have now been sodomized.The Infamous Scamola said:
Rule 34 is pure evil. I don't care if anyone thinks that's subjective or not.
mwhaha XD
I think Rule 34 pronz could divided roughly into two distinct catagories
1)Pronz made deliberatly to destroy your childhood- e.g- rule 34 on little mermaid for exhample- this is, i hope, done for the lulz
2)Pronz made to satisfy some bizzare fetish, an aspect of human psyco-sexuality- a soft exhample could be foot fetishsm or bondage. Rule 34 comes in when pscyo-sexuality gets more bizzare- someone before mentioned "goo girls" which would be a good exhample of this, other more bizzare ones could be vore (eating fetish) and even, most wierdly, egg laying- oh and "petrification" fetish- that comes from watching channel 4 documentries late at night XD
The others came from lurking on b too often. Hell, you learn a lot about the darkside of humanity from browsing b.
I think Rule 34 pronz could divided roughly into two distinct catagories
1)Pronz made deliberatly to destroy your childhood- e.g- rule 34 on little mermaid for exhample- this is, i hope, done for the lulz
2)Pronz made to satisfy some bizzare fetish, an aspect of human psyco-sexuality- a soft exhample could be foot fetishsm or bondage. Rule 34 comes in when pscyo-sexuality gets more bizzare- someone before mentioned "goo girls" which would be a good exhample of this, other more bizzare ones could be vore (eating fetish) and even, most wierdly, egg laying- oh and "petrification" fetish- that comes from watching channel 4 documentries late at night XD
The others came from lurking on b too often. Hell, you learn a lot about the darkside of humanity from browsing b.