veloper said:I don't think we will, not for $60 expansion packs.RJ 17 said:Snip.
We'll just have to wait and see if Blizzard is really that stupid, or worse, that the gaming masses are that stupid and fork over another $60, twice.
As for the Terran campaign being 1/3 of a campaign, I feel the SC2 missions are superior to the original missions in SC1, because there's more variety in the objectives now. Not mere skirmishes against the AI, just with unit types disabled.
Maybe the 3 SC1 campaigns did take a bit longer to complete (I don't recall exactly anymore), but for each race it was unit tutorial missions all over until the end and a couple base interior missions.
I never cared much for the story itself, it's bad and so was SC1's writing, but here atleast alot more work went into the presentation. The content in Wings of Liberty cannot honestly be considered any less complete than previous Blizzard titles.
I do wonder if Blizzard will be able to come up with anything resembling a story for the zerg campaign though. The only zerg with any kind of personality was Kerrigan. The upcoming expansion is where I expect to find the deepest lows in the series.
To you both: I have heard numerous times that "Oh Blizzard said they'll be pricing the next installments of SC II at "expansion prices", so it won't be full priced." Maybe you're right, unfortunatey past evidence says that Blizzard making such a statement is absolutely meaningless. I'll give the WoW expansions a pass at being full price because of the nature of MMO's and the fact that they add so much content with free content expansions down the line for each expansion. However as far as the RTS games are concerned, Brood Wars and Frozen Throne were expansions, and both of them cost full-game price.Darkmantle said:I just hope they have the sense to price it at about 40$, blizzard did say that HotS would be priced as an expansion, not a full game, so they MUST mean lower than 60$, right? I honestly don't think they would charge full price for HotS, and I am totally willing to eat these words if they do.veloper said:More SnippageRJ 17 said:Big Snip
EDIT: oh btw, you play as Kerrigan in HotSjust thought you should know.
I caps'd the parts of your statement that I specifically wanted to address, because that's exactly how it was for me: I had originally got WoW because damn it I wanted to know what happens next! Frozen Throne ends with Arthas taking his place as the all-power Lich King, and I was REALLY hoping that's where it would pick up...but instead the original WoW, while still fun, gave us nothing but a buncha dungeons and stories that had absolutely nothing to do with the events at the end of Frozen Throne...in fact we had to wait for 2 expansions before we could get any closure on the Arthas saga.michael87cn said:I was there for some of that too. But mostly, I was the opposite of you, realised immediately the unimportance of gear/item obtaining and instead, ONLY WANTED TO EXPERIENCE THE CONTENT THAT WAS SO EASILY GIVEN IN WC1,2 AND 3.. but so hard to see in WoW. I wanted to see the rest of the story and was neither willing nor able to provide the time, WORK or socializing REQUIRED to play the 'end-game' 'content'.RJ 17 said:Good lord man, you actually quoted my entire OP?![]()
If you noticed, I capitalized the words required and work, not to emphasize yelling, but the words themselves.
GAMES SHOULDN'T HAVE REQUIRED ELEMENTS, AND THEY SHOULD BE FUN, NOT WORK.
I am waiting for WoW, and MMORPGs to come around and stop being about loot. Someday we'll have good MMOs again. That is my hope.
And yeah, that was one of the major points I've been talking about all along: the game began to feel more like a job or a chore, but instead of getting paid to do said job/chore, I was having to pay in order to do it. I did have fun for the first few years, but just couldn't convince myself it was worth continuing to pay for.