My review on the old Atari E.T game.

[Iandiaeufaieubfeuihfi]

The worst game in the world. Some people probably heard of this game, since it is so famous for being terrible. It made Atari stop making games. It was so bad, they had to dump all of them. You die when you walk. There are numerous glitches in this game, I can't count on how many. You have to be a genious to get past Level 1. I think if you go to New Mexico and start digging in random places, you will eventually find an E.T game. It was made in such a short time so it can fit in the Christmas shopping period, it was an epic failiure. I had more excitement on losing my quarters then playing this mess. Superman 64 can't even be compared to this trash. Pac-man was made before E.T i think and I had more fun with it. Hell, Pac-man beats about 50% of all the ps3,xbox 360, games combined. But E.T was a great example. GAME DEVLOPING IS NOT EASY AS YOU THINK.

 

[Dr. Crawver]

it was a very bad game, but this is also a very bad review

 

[dududf]

This is not a review.

This is just bad.

My first review was better, and I thought that was horrible.

 

[Hybridwolf]

Okay...

You need alot more detail, and the game you picked has a metric shitload of infomation you could have used. Like how it took the first Mario game, Jumpman, to save the videogame market, and how America lost it's grip on gaming after it's release. Point is, why did you bother making this?

 

[Radeonx]

This barely qualifies as a good rant, let alone a review.
At least make an attempt to produce quality material if you are going to write a review.

 

[Harkonnen64]

Uh... I think we all kind of already knew E.T. sucked, kinda infamous for it; is there a point here?

 

[markstit]

Not such a good review Z3r0H0urs... maybe a bit more content? But this is not to discourage, keep trying!

And dose anyone know where they buried the the games at?
You would think some kinda environmental group would be all over that. XD