Zeithri said:
atombeast707 said:
Zeithri said:
Sounds to me like you both got problems.
Seriously, 16, the age of experimentation?
Right.. Perhaps you should grow up a bit and start using that brain of yours before you waste it..
dude, you dont know me or the area i come from. I am a pot head, and an occasional drinker, but i still perform well in school (3.8 gpa with 4 AP classes) and i am still a smart person. my family is one of users, with everyone in my close family being, at one point in time, heavy smokers (pot, not cigs) and drinkers. my dad grew out of drinking, my mom grew out of both. my oldest sister is now unable to smoke, but does numerous other drugs as replacements. i was basically born into this, and most of my family started younger than i did. so you can now leave.
"
You do not know me, therefore this makes it right!"
That is basically what you are saying here.
So what I am saying is this;
- Enjoy your future life as an addict if you're going to pull a pretend-mature arguement like that.
Oh come on, you don't seriously think that all drug use has to eventuate in addiction and wasted lives do you? Check the statistics on damage to the community caused by alcohol vs damage caused by illegal drugs. I'm too old to be interested in intoxicants these days, but I certainly don't regret having had fun with them in my youth. It didn't stop me from going on to a great career and a great marriage; neither did it stop almost all of my friends fro m having financial and relationship success. On the other hand, I know plenty of people with conservative lifestyles who ended up pretty miserably in both regards.
The important thing is that you don't take those risks blindly. Alcohol and drugs can kill you - like cliff diving or hang-gliding, they are fun, but the dangers are real. Nobody ever harped on me for taking risks hang-gliding as a youth, yet the same principle applied - trading real risk for fun and experience.
When I was young, the main mistake that I saw others make with drugs was underestimating how quickly the mental deteriation of intoxicants can take its toll. If you were to, say, have a drink after breakfast and a drink before lunch, then another drink when coming home from work, people would rightly call you an alcoholic. Too many pot-users will do exactly that with marijuana without realising they have a problem. Similarly, they'll think they aren't doing damage by using it weekly (just like alcohol), when that's enough to cause significant impairment to short-term memory.
Mind you, I was more into party drugs than marijuana, and frankly I think that was less harmful simply by virtue of them not being drugs that you'd take with the same regularity as pot. Of course, I would have done that a few times a year - just like most people. Obviously anyone who thinks that they can use ecstacy every week, or even every month, is going to end up in trouble, but you're talking about a tiny minority of drug users who do that. It's like measuring alcohol by the folks who drink daily, or measuring hang-gliding by the folks who don't check their safety gear.
As a lawyer and a political activist, I've been lobbying for years to decriminalise drug use, because more harm is done by the criminalisation process than the drugs themselves. And that's saying something - the drugs do cause harm, but one size fits all attitudes to it cause more harm. Should a kid use drugs? Absolutely not, and they shouldn't hang-glide either. If they do, does it mean their life is screwed? No, and such absurdly absolutist claims don't help anyone. Do I regret using drugs? Hell no, I had some of the best experiences of my life. Not 'because' of the drugs, but they were part of those experiences, forming moments in relationships and memories that are dear to me, and that never spilt over into addiction (though again, I agree that addiction and harm are genuine risks).
Some people will be horrified that an adult will hop on a site like this and say anything other than 'of course you must never ever ever touch illegal drugs'. But frankly, the kids know better than that, and in any event I'm not inclined to lie in an 'ends justify the means' manner. What I will say is that most people fall into simplistic viewpoints on this issue - either that all drug use is harmful because of the few people who can't take responsibility for their own actions, or that their personal use of drugs can't ever be harmful. Any level of drug use is risky, just like any level of hang-gliding is risky. But we take risks all the time, deliberately and without others harping on us for it. More people die in Australia from skin cancer due to sun exposure, than who die from illicit drugs. Yet we take for granted that all people have a right to determine for themselves what degree of sun exposure they want to have. We let them choose their level of educated risk, and the same can and should apply to the risks from drug use.
For readers with the opposite inclination (i.e. young and inclined towards drug experimentation) keep this in mind - I don't use drugs or alcohol these days, despite being in a financial position to do so, so obviously I've got reasons for that. As much as I think drugs should be legalised, and that 'all drug use --> addiction' is a stupid and baseless generalisation, drug use WILL affect your mental capacities. It WILL make you less mentally sharp, it WILL make university/school harder, it WILL increase your exposure to mental illness, it WILL leave you tired and grumpy for days after, it WILL increase the risk of lung cancer if you smoke it, or liver damage if you eat/drink it, or nasal cancer if you snort it, or death in a gazillion ways if you're stupid enough to inject it, and if you do it on a regular basis it WILL cause serious damage to your health and life. Quire a few of these dangers kick in very very quickly - even with marijuana. In fact, don't start thinking that marijuana is 'softer' than other drugs - it hugely increases risk of serious mental illness and almost immediately reduces your ability to remember and think quickly, and I'm talking about when you're 'sober', not just when you're stoned.
Contrary to the above poster, and as someone with a PhD who has spent time as an academic as well as private legal practice, I don't know of ANY academic who get more work done 'while stoned'. There's a huge difference between saying 'some people can have a vice and still function', and saying 'having a vice won't affect your level of functioning'. Few people can smoke marijuana for 20+years and still function well in a competitive academic field. More to the point, marijuana harms your mental capacity - that's just part and parcel of what it does. People trade risk/harms for enjoyment all the time, so I'm not saying that there aren't any academics who do that with pot. But if you start thinking that you can do drugs without it affecting your productivity, then frankly you're one of the people who shouldn't be touching the stuff. Part of being a responsible drug user is acknowledging the damage that it is doing.