Piracy isn't theft. Developers do not loose anything from piracy. A lost sale is not thievery. Just had to put that out there.bfgmetalhead said:theiving of deserving companys is unacceptable.
Piracy isn't theft. Developers do not loose anything from piracy. A lost sale is not thievery. Just had to put that out there.bfgmetalhead said:theiving of deserving companys is unacceptable.
And how does taking the computer program property of another without right or permission fails to comply the definition? Merriam-Webster defines take as "to get into one's hands or into one's possession, power, or control", and by pirating you are certanly getting a game into your possession without right, or are you not?SmashLovesTitanQuest said:Its not my definition, its the definition of the Oxford dictionary.
Actually the one I am going to post is from some other online dictionary I found by means of google, but whatever.
v.tr.
1. To take (the property of another) without right or permission.
On a site that will ban you for being pro-piracy, where even people who aren't pro-piracy have to tread EXTREMELY carefully to avoid moderation?bfgmetalhead said:Thanks bro, I half expected the responses to be Y U NO LIEK PIRATES!! ******!
Oh No! Maybe you can reporting to the internet police!bfgmetalhead said:Anyway I need some advice, is their any system that I can report this to secretly?
Sounds, to me, like a great argument for saying "fuck the game companies and the horse they rode in on. First Sale FTW."NameIsRobertPaulson said:According to the game companies, we do not own the games, we own the license to play them.
Since we cannot give the license to people when they borrow the game, people who borrow ARE stealing.
LOL. I loved that.Unsilenced said:If you really want to be the great champion of all legality... well go for it I guess. Report him, but I swear to god you had better not ever jaywalk or speed again.
Fake DMCA notification from his ISP would probably get the point across. At the very least, it'd be funny as hell to see their reaction if you're into that sort of thing.If you just want him to stop pirating, or at least make him think twice, there are a number of ways to get that message through. I suggested earlier making a fake "you're busted" letter to give him a bit of a scare
And if everybody pirated all the time then there would be no more games industry. Perhaps you should look up Immanuel Kant, become his best friend and learn a little bit of morality.SmashLovesTitanQuest said:Tanakh said:And how does taking the computer program property of another without right or permission fails to comply the definition? Merriam-Webster defines take as "to get into one's hands or into one's possession, power, or control", and by pirating you are certanly getting a game into your possession without right, or are you not?SmashLovesTitanQuest said:Its not my definition, its the definition of the Oxford dictionary.
Actually the one I am going to post is from some other online dictionary I found by means of google, but whatever.
v.tr.
1. To take (the property of another) without right or permission.
Also I dont know what's the issue people take by assuming the possesive of something, it might be the Oxford dictionary definition, but I would assume it's also yours and that doesn't devalue it, does it?
I recommend setting this as your desktop background until the message finally drills its way through your skull.
They forfeit the "stealing" option if they want to go the license route. This is part of the problem: Game companies need to decide if they are a product or a service and stick with it, not play both sides of the coin.NameIsRobertPaulson said:According to the game companies, we do not own the games, we own the license to play them.
Since we cannot give the license to people when they borrow the game, people who borrow ARE stealing.
Yeah, I know you said you wouldn't read any replies, but I'm gonna reply anyway, because I agree with you. I mean, if the punishment for piracy was life imprisonment or execution or something, then defend your friend at all costs. Morality above legality. But piracy is immoral and illegal, and since the OP's friend is so convinced he doesn't owe the company anything for using their product, maybe it's time he took a good kick to the bank account. This...anti-snitch culture is quite frankly insulting. And it's dangerous. If I found out a friend was pirating and I disagreed, I'd not do anything about it. If they were laughing in my face and telling me how they can break the law whenever they want simply because they want to...wellDevil said:I think what surprises me most about this entire thread is how much people will bash the OP just because he considers going to the authorities for a friend breaking a law. Last I checked, being a friend does not mean "you must cover up this dirty behavior," nor anything else. Loyalty to a friend must be your own personal choice, and if you decide not to there's nothing wrong with it. Why must you risk your reputation for allowing your friends to be criminals? That's just sickening.
Maybe I'm just a different class, all of my friends prefer to actually help society, and we know each others dark secrets, and none involve law breaking (just lots of stupid or messed up situations but surprisingly nothing illegal about them). While I know if one of them did something illegal, I wouldn't report it (depending, I actually am required to report things like this in my position), but I would force them to man up about it. Either they fix it some way, turn themselves in, or I will no longer affilate myself with them and will spread the word that others should not either. We've already done this to a few former friends, and we all know the risks associated. Any time one of our core group messes up, they've always repaid their debt somehow, and we all know about it because we have integrity--which appears to be the last pure form of humanity left in this world.
Shame, loyalty being put up before integrity. Friends before personal morals. No wonder people give into peer pressure so easily these days or allow entire crimes to be committed under their nose. People just don't know the right choice anymore.
Good luck, OP. Whatever you decide to do to handle this, just make sure you're comfortable doing it with your integrity. You don't necessarily have to report him, but at the same time you don't have to ignore it like majority in this thread seem to want. (I assume most here are afraid if this catches on they themselves will be caught the same way your friend is)
Integrity first.
(PS: I don't respond to threads after controversial posts because I know it's meaningless. Remarks to this post won't even be read. Just wanted to give you all a heads' up.)
Take video games out of your friendship then, simple as that. If you don't like that he pirates, then games are one discussion that you will not have with him, and you will not enjoy with him. When he asks why, and you tell him, and he decides that piracy is more valuable than friendship. Well then that will show how much of a friend he really is.bfgmetalhead said:-snip except for the bit where you said you need to get a scare out of him before he gets in worse trouble, or uses it to laugh in your face.
Kant's universal maxims, while quite useless for neutral actions, are quite good for more morally clear-cut affairs like piracy. Piracy is bad. There is no justification for it. Well, with the exception of the region-locks and shit - no reason to miss out on a game just because you were born in the wrong place.SmashLovesTitanQuest said:Yep, thats true. Which is why I buy a lot of games, as do most gamers.Thyunda said:And if everybody pirated all the time then there would be no more games industry.
Kant? That religiously blinded philosopher? Fat chance. I wouldnt put myself through his dribble again if you paid me.Thyunda said:Perhaps you should look up Immanuel Kant, become his best friend and learn a little bit of morality.
I have some reading for you though: Schopenhauer. Maybe the old man can reduce the number of useless recommendations made on these forums.