Neil Gaiman accused of abuse and plagiarism.

XsjadoBlaydette

~s•o√r∆rπy°`Inc hope GrIfts etUrnaL
May 26, 2022
1,205
1,494
118
Clear 'n Present Danger
Country
Must
Gender
Disappear
Y
S . C . I . E . N . T . O . L . O . G . Y
G
Y . G . O . L . O . T . N . E . I . C . S
L
Neil Gaiman’s Scientology Suicide Story
March 7, 2023 By Mike Rinder 45 Comments
O
1739121013872.png
This interesting piece detailing a tumultuous period of scientology’s history was sent to me by Mike Crotty, the creator of the Investigative Youtube series ‘Comic’s Secret History’
T
Whether you agree with his conclusions concerning why Neil Gaiman’s book frames events as it does, he has laid out the history of scientology in the UK in the mid-60’s better than I have seen it done anywhere before. It was a convulsive time and led to the formation of the Sea Org when Hubbard left the UK to try his luck in reassuming his role as founder of Rhodesia, and failing at that

N
Neil Gaiman’s Scientology Suicide Secret
E

The Cult at the End of the Lane.
I
In 1968 Scientology was in trouble. In the space of just a few weeks in the late summer, the British Government had introduced sweeping new legislation, effectively outlawing it in its adopted world headquarters in the UK. Its founder and leader L Ron Hubbard, who had just been declared ‘Persona Non Grata’ by the Government, announced his sudden resignation & departure from the organisation. There were also a series of damaging lawsuits and lurid articles around its activities, when 2 of its leading figures; a married couple, invented a series of lies about the tragic suicide of their lodger to save the cult and their livelihoods.
C
45 years later, shortly after the death of his beloved father, their son, acclaimed author Neil Gaiman wrote a book inspired by their lies, which whilst obviously fictional and fantastical, stated its origin; his parent’s lies to save Scientology were true, and he even invented more lies to desecrate their lodger’s suicide. The critically acclaimed, multi-award-winning book has already been added to school’s curriculums, adapted as an equally successful stage play, touring across the U.S in 2023 and is in pre-production as a film with Director Joe Wright (Darkest Hour) at Tom Hank’s production company “Playtone,” but here for the very first time is the true story behind “the true story behind” ‘The Ocean At The End Of The Lane’.
S
In the unusually dull and wet British summer of late August 1968, a seven-year-old boy stood waiting to be interviewed by the BBC in the front garden of his parents’ house in West Sussex. His father, who was the head of worldwide Communications for the organisation the interview was about stood by closely watching events proceed, ready to assist and intercede if necessary. The interview had been arranged and conceived by his father as the start of a plan that would subsequently involve lies, intimidation, harassment, threats, false testimony under oath, attempting to usurp Britain’s leading mental health charity and even a hunger strike to the death. The BBC publicity was the first step in response to a decision by the British Government, a month earlier on the 25th of July of 1968, that had severe consequences for his employer and his own livelihood. Barely a week after that, the organisation had suffered an even more devastating blow, when the boy’s mother, also a prominent figure in the organisation, had announced to the world on the 2nd of August 1968 that their employer’s founder and leader had stepped down and away from the organisation with immediate effect.
Cults?
As the BBC Journalist Keith Graves began his pre-interview testing of his recording equipment in late August 1968, nobody could have imagined that 45 years later, the child would revisit this time and place in an acclaimed fictional novel to showcase and perpetuate his parent’s invented story about the suicide of their lodger just days later, to protect the Church Of Scientology, in a work cherished by millions across the world in various media. Graves pressed ‘record’ and spoke into the microphone to I.D. the interview: “Neil Gaiman, 7 years old. Radio Interview. BBC Radio ‘World at Weekend’. August 1968.
See
Neil Gaiman is one of the world’s best-selling, critically acclaimed and award-winning Fantasy Authors. His work including ‘Good Omens’, ‘Stardust’, ‘Coraline’, ‘American Gods’ and ‘Ocean at The End of The Lane’ has sold tens of millions of copies in multiple languages, garnered hundreds of awards and been adapted into Audio Dramas, Theatre Plays, Television series and Films. One of his earliest works, the comic book series ‘Sandman’ started in 1987, is currently one of the most watched television series on Netflix and a 2nd series has just been announced. Neil’s skill at communication has served him well; he’s a rare breed of writer who through his copious interviews, speaking events and public appearances, is as beloved by his fans as any of his works. Whether through these public events or his active online presence (he has 3 million Twitter followers), there isn’t much his devoted audience don’t know about Neil, except for his impeccably opaque long-standing Scientology connections.
Not
Now widely viewed as a showbiz science-fiction-esque religion with sinister undertones, Scientology was invented in 1953 by the pulp writer L Ron Hubbard. It was launched into the post war vacuum of disenchantment with traditional religion and the growing impact of scientific ‘marvels’ in improving everybody’s lives, and thanks to a massive promotional and advertising blitz, its followers grew quickly with its promise of ‘scientifically proven’ methods to improve member’s lives beyond the scope of just modern medicine. The financial cost of this, which enriched and empowered the organisation greatly thanks to its religious ‘Church’ tax status, was something that followers were not made aware of until after they were informed how essential Scientology was for improving their lives. In 1959 Hubbard bought an isolated mansion in the British Sussex Countryside; Saint Hill Manor. Built in the late 18th Century with 50 acres of surrounding countryside, the nearest town was the tiny East Grinstead, several miles of twisting small country lanes away, which afforded Saint Hill Manor privacy, isolation and importantly room for expansion. All of which suited Hubbard who decided to use it as Scientology’s worldwide headquarters and base for training and indoctrinating its followers. It’s relative closeness to London and its airports, for ferrying international students, was also an advantage as East Grinstead was situated less than an hour away, almost exactly halfway off the M23 major motorway to the seaside town of Brighton, also less than an hour’s drive away.
Just
Neil Gaiman’s parents David and Sheila were converts to Scientology in the early sixties, they gave up their careers (he was a grocer, she was a pharmacist) and they moved their family to the outskirts of East Grinstead, buying the nearest available home to Saint Hill Manor; Harwood House, which though also distanced by the meandering miles of winding country lanes from the town, was just a mile away from the Scientology HQ. Both began working with Hubbard in Saint Hill Manor and quickly established themselves in its hierarchy; aside from working in high ranking positions in the World Wide Communications department they also ran the only canteen on the premises for the hundreds of staff and students, lodged paying students in their home and also used their Scientology connections, backgrounds and resources to start up a mail order Vitamin company ‘G&G Vitamins’ from their home in 1965; a business that grew exponentially as their status in the cult did. Scientology was rewarding for the Gaimans in more ways than for most of its followers.
Americans
David Gaiman was relatively famous in Britain in the sixties (and on into the seventies). As head of Scientology’s Worldwide Communications, he was the public face of Scientology in the UK; he often appeared on television, radio or in the press as their spokesperson in response to negative stories or articles which were increasing along with the cult’s presence. He was adept publicly at what appeared to be a calm and reasoned responses about Scientology, while privately threatening lawsuits and issuing libel writs against the people and media behind ‘anti-Scientology’ stories. When Hubbard decided around 1966 that Scientology’s best defence against negative stories was to attack the sources rather than the stories, it was David who took up the charge and began planning ways to undermine Scientology’s critics while his colleagues in the more proactive Saint Hill Manor’s ‘Guardian’s Office’ took a swifter and more immediate approach.
Do
Hubbard requested they produce stories about “murder, assault, destruction, violence, sex and dishonesty in that order” against their ‘enemies’, to attack and undermine, using any means necessary. Their most prominent critics including the National Association of Mental Health. At the time the NAMH was the largest mental health charity in the UK (and still is today under its new name; MIND). In the early sixties this association was one of the most vocal critics of Scientology and the dangers it posed in its practice of attacking and forbidding any and all psychological or psychiatric treatments. Kenneth Robinson; the UK Minister for Health, who would introduce the sanctions against Scientology in 1968, was NAMH’s vice president until he became Minister and he was replaced by Robert Lindsey; Lord Balniel. Balniel was the first person to raise concerns about Scientology and its dangerous attitude to mental health to the new Minister for Health. As early as 1966 Hubbard personally instructed staff to ‘get a detective to dig up dirt on Balniels’s past’.
Or
The ‘Guardians Office’ of Saint Hill Manor, which David Gaiman later headed, set about hiring a detective to dig up dirt against their establishment critics. They held interviews and audited prospective detectives using their patented ‘e-meter’ technology (two metal handheld tubes with electric wires attached to a meter) to ensure they weren’t spies and were aligned with Scientology. Unfortunately their secret scientology device didn’t work and the detective they hired; Vic Filson was so appalled by the instructions he was given, which included “Start feeding lurid, blood sex crime [sic] actual evidence on the attackers to the press” that he went straight to the newspapers exposing Scientology’s plans along with Hubbard’s own personal instructions. The story, which appeared in ‘The People’ newspaper in March 1966, revealed that Scientology’s first target was to be Lord Balniel. While there had been a myriad of lurid stories about Scientology and Hubbard in the UK Tabloids and more medically established critical ones in the ‘Broadsheets’ previously, it was this story initiated and executed by both Hubbard and the Cult’s ineptitude, that grabbed the British Public’s attention and set in motion events that led to the Government’s July 1968 action.
Me
In response to mounting public backlash against Scientology’s actions, the British Government, through the Minister for Health Kenneth Robinson, took the decision on 25th July 1968 to declare L Ron Hubbard ‘Persona Non Grata’; banning him from Britain and implemented a ban on any foreign nationals intending on studying or working in Scientology. In spite of his expressed shock and indignation at the UK Government’s actions, David Gaiman had already been developing a multi-pronged media driven very public response.
Just
By late August 1968, everything was going to plan for the Gaimans. 7-Year-old Scientologist Neil’s interview had gone better than his parents could have hoped; the BBC’s Keith Graves described him at the end of the interview as “Extraordinary”. David meanwhile was progressing ahead with his own plan to destroy the NAMH, while at the same time both parents were working at Saint Hill Manor which was issuing 40 writs for defamation against the media, their neighbours in East Grinstead and their local M.P. Geoffrey Johnson Smith, who had stated in light of the U.K Governments banning of Scientology students that; “scientologists direct themselves deliberately towards the weak, the unbalanced, the immature, the rootless and the mentally or emotionally unstable.”. David had already responded with a statement published in the ‘Observer’ newspaper on the 25th August rebuking Johnson Smith’s comments and by extension the UK Government’s stance: “From a personal viewpoint I am a little bored with the allegation that everyone in Scientology is either neurotic, weak-witted or naive, especially since the mentally and physically ill are not permitted Scientology training and processing (counselling)“ and then less than a week later, on the 30th of August, their lodger for over 2 and a half months, Scientology student Johannes Scheepers killed himself using their car.
It
The name Johannes Scheepers means nothing to the millions of people across the world who are intimately familiar with how he died. His death is even part of the UK’s school’s curriculum; but all of Neil Gaiman’s 2013 ‘Ocean at the End of the Lane’ retellings don’t afford him his name. Almost every fact about the suicide victim was erased by Neil in both his novel and the dozens of times he spoke about the ‘True Story’ of Scheepers, while he invented a history to damage his reputation, as his parents did decades before him. The only factual account of Johannes Scheepers tragic suicide exists in the Times Newspaper’s reporting of his inquest on the 5th of September 1968, and it paints a very different picture to that portrayed and promoted by both generations of Gaimans.
Is
Scheepers was only 29 years old when he travelled six thousand miles from South Africa to Saint Hill Manor to study Scientology in early June 1968. We know this because the ‘Times’ account of his inquest reveals that he described himself as a ‘Student of Scientology’ on his alien registration card when he entered the UK, before being permitted to travel on to lodge with the Gaimans in their isolated Harwood House, weeks before the UK Government ban was introduced. We know he was white; under Hubbard’s instructions Scientology was rabidly racist and pro-apartheid in South Africa and would remain so until the mid-Eighties. There is also an extraordinary account of the experiences of foreign Scientology students, from the renowned author Alan Levy, who visited Saint Hill Manor to study Scientology at the same time as Scheepers did and later wrote about it for ‘Life Magazine’ in November 1968; “my contract for Grades V through VII called upon me to pay not the $390 New York and London had given me to understand — but $3,150! “Plus living expenses,” added the Cashier, whom the Registrar had summoned in the expectation of having my signature witnessed. “The information you say you were given in London and New York is wrong. These our are rates, payable in advance. We can’t have credit, can we?”. Unlike Levy, Scheepers stayed studying Scientology at Saint Hill Manor right up until he took his life on 30th August 1968; It was important enough for him to record on two notes just before his death, which were found on his body, that he was a Scientologist and that Scientology wasn’t to blame for him committing suicide. In fact all the evidence presented to the court revealed exactly the tragic and lurid story the British Press loved; a foreign Scientology Student who lived with the Scientology’s power couple; one of whom was their public face of the cult, who then used their car to commit suicide close to the cult’s worldwide headquarters.

It’s hard to imagine a more unfortunate turn of events for the Gaimans, and at a more inconvenient time. But David Gaiman was the Worldwide Communications Head of the cult with good reason, with just days to prepare, he created and told a story at the inquest, with his wife Sheila’s help, to protect Scientology and by extension themselves and their livelihood. According to the ‘Times’ Inquest report, David, who was described as “senior executive of the cult” denied on oath that Scheepers was a Scientologist or studying at Saint Hill Manor or registered at any Scientology establishment in Britain. He also denied he was their lodger or that he even knew him. He was simply someone who had stayed at Harwood House very briefly 2 and a half months ago, then left and returned after ten weeks just before committing suicide. Having deftly removed Scientology and the Gaiman family from the narrative David, still under oath, then presented the inquest with a perfectly reasonable explanation for his suicide and lack of any funds; which Alien Students were required to have as part of their Visa conditions.

Scheepers was a gambler who came to the UK to gamble, David swore to the inquest, who didn’t question why a gambler with ‘Scientology Student’ on his Alien Visa would leave the gambling mecca of London and travel to an isolated farmhouse next to Scientology’s World Headquarters. Gaiman continued his tale, explaining that Scheepers had left Harwood House shortly after arriving in June, for Brighton which was less than an hour away on his original route from London, and that he then hadn’t seen him for over 10 weeks. Sheila Gaiman joined the story when David explained what happened while Scheepers was in Brighton and not living with them or studying Scientology that tidily explained his suicide; “Scheepers had mentioned casually to my wife that his gambling system had broken down, and from that I gathered the impression he was broke”. Based on the evidence and David Gaiman’s oath-sworn testimony, the East Sussex coroner Dr Angus Summerville recorded a verdict of ‘Suicide’ and the inquest was closed. The reassuring rationale of gambling and the absence of any tabloid-tempting Scientology involvement killed the story as quickly and quietly as carbon monoxide poisoning. Or at least it would have if, Neil hadn’t resurrected it 45 years later for his first work after the death of his father David.

Neil Gaiman’s own version of the truth, taken here from the end of the book itself, adds details nowhere to be found in the inquest reporting, which serves to only damage Scheepers memory more and it cannot be overstated that this is about a young man who killed himself; “he smuggled all of his friend’s money out of South Africa and which he was going to bank for them, because there were apparently limits to what you could take out of South Africa. He went to Brighton, to a casino, and spent all his money – and his friends’ money.”. Neil added an element of illicit criminality to his actions as well as the morally reprehensible gambling away of all his friends’ money also. However just as there wasn’t a shred of evidence to suggest Scheepers was a gambler, curiously there wasn’t even a reference to this pivotal point in either of his suicide notes; Neil’s additional info about ‘smuggling’ and financial restrictions in South Africa were factually incorrect; there were no financial restrictions between South Africa and the UK in the sixties. Most UK Banks had branches in South Africa until anti-apartheid pressure in the mid-eighties caused them to rethink their position; much like Scientology in fact.

There is at least a logic, abhorrent as it may be, in David and Sheila’s desecration of their tormented Scientologist lodger; their reputations, livelihoods and belief system hung in the balance of the inquests outcome and disowning fellow Scientologists and disparaging them falsely was and is common practice in the cult. Neil’s considerably more far reaching desecration and additional falsehoods are more difficult to rationalise and can be best appreciated when delivered by himself to an audience. One of Neil’s talks promoting ‘Ocean at the End of the Lane’ in 2013 with British actor Sir Lenny Henry at the National Theatre is available on Youtube. Around the 5 minute and 30 second mark he tells the ‘true story’ of Johannes Scheepers to an audience; host Henry obviously ignorant to any of facts, makes light of him gambling away his friend’s money prompting laughter from the audience. He then appears horrified that Neil would put the ‘real’ suicide in the book which draws more laughter from the crowd, Neil dismisses his horrified reaction and carries on recounting his 43-year-old self’s (he says he learnt the story in 2003) annoyance that ‘something interesting had happened and nobody told him’; cue mass laughter all round.

There is always the possibility that Neil wrote ‘Ocean’ as a tribute to his father (though he dedicated it and says he wrote it for his now ex-wife Amanda Palmer) and the story that David created to save Scientology. The book opens with the Narrator (who Neil has confirmed is himself) leaving a funeral where he spoke, intending to go to his Sister’s house to meet old friends and this really happened in 2009 at his Father’s funeral where a massive Scientology service was held in Saint Hill Manor followed by a smaller Jewish funeral the next day; Neil’s only sister still living in the UK is Lizzy Calcioli and she is one half of the UK’s current Scientology power couple. However Neil clearly went above and beyond just retelling his Father’s account. For somebody who has professed not to being a Scientologist for decades, everything he did to Johannes Scheepers memory in the book is straight out of the Scientology play-book; whitewashing Scientology out of the picture, defaming the ‘troublemaker’ and inventing falsehoods to attack him.

Neil Gaiman’s history with Scientology is very murky; deliberately so. His family are practically Scientology royalty in the UK, he met his first wife Mary McGrath while she was studying Scientology and lodging at Harrow House and he himself worked as a Scientology Auditor for several years in the Eighties and was a Director of a Scientologist’s property company ‘Centrepoint’ until 1999. He now won’t discuss his own Scientology connections and states, without any details, that he’s no longer a member of the Cult that supported Apartheid up until the mid eighties, believes homosexuals are deviants and mental illness is a manifestation of personal failure in the sufferer’s current or past life; beliefs which are anathema to most of Neil’s adoring audience.

His connection to Scientology and apparent departure from the cult first went public as part of a court case in 2002 where when asked “Are you still involved with the Church of Scientology?” Neil said “I don’t understand the question”, subsequently asked “Are you still a member of the Church of Scientology?” he replied “I don’t consider myself as such”. Even then his admission that he worked for the Church for 3 years is somewhat confusing: “I worked for a 3 year period after getting out of school as a ‘Counsellor’ for the Church of Scientology”; in fact he actually worked as an ‘Auditor’ in a process made famous in the award winning 2015 Documentary ‘Going Clear’ which explains how officials in the Church of Scientology keep in-depth records on everything its members say during private ‘auditing’ sessions and then use their secrets against them. Renowned Journalist and author on Scientology Tony Ortega says that Gaiman “became a Class VIII auditor, and even ran the Birmingham “org” as its ED, executive director. “.

While there is no contradiction in Neil’s actual admission of working for Scientology up till the late Nineties and subsequently leaving the cult and its beliefs sometime in the early Noughties, conflicting details arise in the period since, when Neil has insisted he’s not a Scientologist. According to public records he was a shareholder in the family firm G&G Foods, which produces the vitamins used in Scientology’s highly criticized Narconon and De-Tox practices, since 2011. He transferred approximately a quarter of a million shares to Scientologist shareholders in 2013. There’s the book ‘Ocean’ also from 2013 and then there’s also his production company ‘The Blank Corporation’. ‘The Blank Corporation’ is Neil’s production company which works on all his adaptations such as ‘Sandman’, ‘Anansi Boys’, ‘Good Omens’ and the upcoming ‘Ocean at the End of the Lane’ in partnership with Netflix, Amazon, Warner Bros, the BBC and others. According to the website and any interviews, Neil founded ‘The Blank Corporation’ in 2016 with his Vice President and former P.A. Cat Mihos. According to the official Companies registration however, the company was actually set up by Neil and then wife (and still devout Scientologist) Mary McGrath in 2000. The company is still registered to a Scientologist’s P.O Box in Wisconsin, where Mary McGrath still works for the Church of Scientology. One company; two very different stories, it’s just another mystery, like what really happened to cause Johannes Scheepers to take his own life in 1968.

David Gaiman went on after his Suicide Inquest testimony to become a central figure in the lawsuits Scientology initiated in the Summer of ’68. They dropped most of them and lost the rest. In 1969 he tried to take over the NAMH by organizing a membership drive amongst Scientologists to afford them voting rights to take over the charity, to elect himself as the new Chairperson. The NAMH’s Lord Balniel recognized what was happening and rescinded the voting rights of the hundreds of new members from East Grinstead who all signed up at the same time. On March 13th 1970 David began a very public Hunger Strike to the Death in protest to the ban on Scientologists entering the UK outside the Government offices in Whitehall but abandoned it less than a fortnight later. In 1971 he took Lord Balniel to court over rescinding the NAMH membership of hundreds of new members from East Grinstead and again lost the case. NAMH later became the charity MIND.

In 1983 David was declared a ‘Suppressive Person’ by Scientology and officially stripped of all his ranks and privileges in the Church due to his ‘Running the canteen for his own profit, using Scientology to push and promote his own G&G Vitamins business’ and “Sexual or Sexually perverted conduct contrary to the well being or good state of mind of a Scientologist in good standing or under the charge of Scientology such as a student, a pre-clear, a ward or a patient.”. While Neil and the rest of the Gaimans remained devoted to the Cult, David had to spend the next 20 years retaking and repaying for every course and training he had already done up to that point. Neil’s mother Sheila went on to introduce the highly dangerous and much criticised Scientology anti-drugs programme ‘Narconon’ to the UK in the eighties, and with David built their Vitamin Company G&G foods in to a multi-million pound business plying their wares at the Chernobyl and 911 disaster sites.

There was clearly a duality to David Gaiman; mirroring that of Scientology. In public he was charming, calm and very reasonable, while in private he was ruthless, cruel and devoted to realising L. Ron Hubbard’s proclamations. And that duality seems present in Neil Gaiman’s attitude to Scientology too; aside from the two histories of his production company. On the one hand apart from the consequences promoting Scientology would have on his brand and his audience, it’s actually understandable why as an apparent former member he doesn’t want to discuss or criticise the cult. Neil would be viewed as the enemy by Scientology, shunned and subjected to unfounded vile attacks; just as Johannes Scheepers was. But on the other hand Neil himself epitomised the very worst attributes of the cult, in how he publicly and jovially described Scheepers suicide and in particular his repeated first hand false accounts to audiences across the world. ‘Ocean at the End of the Lane’ is coming to a theatre near you, soon.
 

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,661
6,864
118
I am interested by this in the sense of... how much of this is true?

We know from experience that Scientologists have a long history of lying to protect themselves, even as deliberate policy. However, on the other hand, there is actually no convincing case made in the article to demonstrate that they did lie. So, what we have are the Gaimans who very plausibly lied being accused by Mike Rinder who ultimately has no meaningful evidence to demonstrate they lied. The truth remains frustratingly out of reach...
 

XsjadoBlaydette

~s•o√r∆rπy°`Inc hope GrIfts etUrnaL
May 26, 2022
1,205
1,494
118
Clear 'n Present Danger
Country
Must
Gender
Disappear
I am interested by this in the sense of... how much of this is true?

We know from experience that Scientologists have a long history of lying to protect themselves, even as deliberate policy. However, on the other hand, there is actually no convincing case made in the article to demonstrate that they did lie. So, what we have are the Gaimans who very plausibly lied being accused by Mike Rinder who ultimately has no meaningful evidence to demonstrate they lied. The truth remains frustratingly out of reach...
(Apologies, this turned out much longer a reply from much vaster a rabbit hole than I anticipated lol)

Which detail are you referring to specifically? The stated motivation for suicide still requires having to take a high-level Scientologist's word for it at a very sensitive time for the cult in the UK. Also, is possible you might have missed the intro paragraph in italics from Rinder explicitly stating the interest was in Scientology's UK shenanigans and wasn't his writing but a shared email of Mike Crotty's analysis, which was my intent when posting at the time too. But now you've poked a curiosity, I have no choice but to indulge. No choice! 😉

So the accompanying video is even more interesting, about lawsuits over comic rights, PR management, charity funds etc I'd not heard of before, involving Todd McFarlane, Gaiman and even Marvel. The suicide is but a fraction of a larger story to do with alleged misplaced charity donations. May be worth your time, it's anti-sensationalist and keeps to a very dry tone if that helps. It's certainly a delivery approach I appreciate in the age of algorithm-chasing hyperbole at least.



If not however, will try to add some context. Depending on how much you already do or don't know of Scientology. Their main "thing" before pulling ppl into all that alien possession crap in the higher tiers of membership, is a deep hatred of psychology/psychiatry (convenient!) so everything they do centres around this. Meaning diagnosis, treatments, medications etc are intensely demonised, and anyone harbouring any mental issues they aggressively treat and call weak - and the rest of the spiteful pejoratives found down the same rabbit hole of condescension. They're ranked "1.1" the lowest in their church of evaluation, which also includes homosexuality. Seems more related to trying to protect Scientology's reputation at a pivotal moment in UK politics around the time the cult was garnering negative attention leading to an eventual ban. They even tried a takeover of mental healthcare services here: NAMH, now 'Mind'. Their various groups created to fight psychiatry fall under what they call 'Citizens Commission on Human Rights' (CCHR) as a persistent lobbying/propaganda conglomerate.




www.gaminfoundation.org



The Gaimans and the Scientology
Hi, the user fieldoflight asked me to share some information I had gained about NG's sister, Lizzy Calcioli. Apparently they have a strong connection to Scientology. One of Lizzy's children, Ale, is a member of the Church of Scientology in Brighton and was in the news 10 years ago. I am sharing some of the things I have found.
Lizzy & Mauro Calcioli and Sheila Gaiman

Sheila Gaiman is somewhat of a household name in Scientology in the UK. She is the mother of famous best-selling author Neil Gaiman and her husband David, who passed away in 2009, once served as Scientology’s UK chief spokesperson. Sheila “has been listed as a “New Civilization Builder” in the UK, which is code for $1 million or more for a particular Ideal Org project.” says Tony Ortega.

Her daughter Lizzy runs G&G Vitamins, an East Grinstead-based supplements business that supplies Orgs with Niacin for their controversial Purification Rundown. She also runs Wealden House, which an inside source tells us “offers introductory courses and auditing for new Scientologists.” Lizzy and Mauro’s children have all served as staff members at the Church of Scientology London and their son Ale (Alessandro) made headline news in 2014 after winning a case in the Supreme Court that allowed him to marry Louisa Hodkin in the UK’s first Scientology wedding.

Their website: G&G Vitamins - Online Supplement Store | G&G Vitamins (gandgvitamins.com)

-

Here's the stuff I found that I kind of wish I'd known about Gaiman before, because it would have complicated things for me even before the allegations came out.

- Gaiman has had shares in G&G from 2011. He still has them!

It can't even be said that the vitamins are just vitamins: they are specifically prescribed in medically worrying doses for the purification rundown/narconon process that has left participants "feeling suicidal and as though their minds had been “shattered” by the exercises".

- Gaiman actively worked as an auditor in the church of scientology for several years.

He has never denounced this work, and there are many fans who still think he remained completely peripheral to the church and never had any active involvement. In fact, it seems like this work and his family's huge wealth made off the back of Scientology is what allowed him to take his time breaking into freelance writing.

What's the big deal, I guess? A lot of people come up on familial wealth gained from shitty stuff. But it's just so completely omitted from the bootstraps-style story Gaiman tells about his start in writing that it felt jarring to find out, and Scientology is pretty outstanding at the top of the list for 'shitty manipulative cults that ruin lives'.

Jeff VanderMeer quite plainly states that Gaiman "hired personal publicists and spent thousands and thousands of dollars" to get ahead, although I don't know how much VanderMeer knows about the situation even as a fellow author.
  • Source 1: Gaiman under oath during his deposition for Gaiman v Mcfarlane. The transcript is no longer online, but it's read out in the youtube video linked here:
Attorney: "of course, we are going to assume there wasn't a 5 year period where you were working without paying taxes?"
Gaiman: "right, I was not. I worked for I think about a 3 year period after getting out of school as a counsellor for the church of Scientology and was not earning enough to pay taxes during that time."
Peter: "I know him. And David was Neil’s father?"
Klaus: "Yes, that was his father. Neil Gaiman was an auditor in the 70s, he audited me too."
"he himself worked as a Scientology Auditor for several years in the Eighties and was a Director of a Scientologist’s property company ‘Centrepoint’ until 1999."

As the video indicates, there was a lot of concern about the young people flocking from overseas to Saint Hill Manor to study Scientology. Scientologists knew they weren’t welcome, but they argued back that they were subject to discrimination.

When David’s son Neil was denied entry to a prep school because of his religious affiliation, Gaiman made sure the BBC heard about it.

Last year, we were the first to post online the transcript from a radio interview of seven-year-old Neil Gaiman, who had been offered to the BBC as the model of a young Scientologist…


NeilGaimanChild


Neil Gaiman 7-years-old, Radio Interview BBC Radio ‘World at Weekend’, August 1968.
Keith Graves: What is Scientology?
Neil: It is an applied philosophy dealing with the study of knowledge.
Keith Graves: Do you know what philosophy is?
Neil: I used to, but I’ve forgotten.
Keith Graves: Who told you that meaning of Scientology?
Neil: In clearer words, it’s a way to make the able person more able.
Keith Graves: What does it do for you — Scientology — does it make you feel a better boy?
Neil:Not exactly that, but when you make a release you feel absolutely great.
Keith Graves: Do you get what you call a release very often, or do you have this all the time?
Neil: Well, you only keep a release all the time when you get Clear. I’m six courses away from Clear.
Keith Graves: You’re on a particular grade are you?
Neil: Well, I’ve just passed Grade I; I’m not Grade II yet.
Keith Graves: What is Grade I?
Neil: Problems Release.
Keith Graves: And what does this mean to you, Problems Release?
Neil: It helps you to handle quite a lot of problems.
Keith Graves: What problems do you have as a little boy that this helps you with?
Neil: Only one big problem.
Keith Graves: What’s that?
Neil: My friend Stephen.
Keith Graves: Oh, I see. Is he a Scientologist?
Neil: Yes.
Keith Graves: But I mean, how does this grade that you’ve got, Problems Release, help you to deal with Stephen?
Neil: Well, you know, I’ve dealed with every single problem except Stephen, one thing Problems Release can’t help me to handle.
Keith Graves: So you still fight with Stephen?
Neil: It’s more of a question he fights with me.
Keith Graves: He’s older than you, presumably.
Neil: Yes.
Keith Graves: And he’s three grades ahead of you?
Neil: In a way, but you see, there are six main courses; but there are ever so many in-between courses. I’ve just finished three, and that’s Engrams.
Keith Graves: What are Engrams?
Neil: Engrams are a mental image picture containing pain and unconsciousness.
Keith Graves: And what does this mean to you?
Neil: Well, shall I tell you? — I’ll give you a demonstration. You’re walking along the street, and a car hooted and somebody shouted, “shooo’, and a dog barked, and you tripped over a bit of metal and hurt your knee. Three years later, say, you were walking along that same place and someone shouted “shooo”, and a car hooted, and a dog barked, and suddenly you feel pain in your knee. I’ve had one Engram that I can remember. I was jumping off the television set. We’ve got a gigantic television set, but it doesn’t work. Onto my mom’s bed and, you see, I jumped and I hit my head on the chandelier, and you know it really hurt; and I looked up and I saw it swinging, and a few minutes later I tried to test an Engram, so I set it swinging and I looked up there, and I suddenly had a headache.
Keith Graves: And how old were you when this happened?
Neil: Around three months ago.
Keith Graves: Oh, I see. How long have you been studying Scientology?
Neil: I started at five, now I’m seven.
Keith Graves:Seven years old. Extraordinary, isn’t it?
The reason we have this radio transcript was that the church printed up pamphlets intending to sway members of Parliament about Scientology’s supposed persecution. Neil’s interview was just one of several things in that pamphlet.

What Gaiman says he definitely did not know at the time was that the same month he gave the BBC interview — August 1968 — there was a suicide on his family’s property.

To help make ends meet, the Gaimans took in lodgers among the Scientology students who had come to Saint Hill. And one of them, a 29-year-old South African man named Johannes Hermanus Scheepers, was found dead in the Gaiman family Mini on August 31, 1968. According to an article written at the time, Scheepers had connected a hose from the car’s exhaust to its interior, and had died of carbon monoxide poisoning…


ScheepersArticle

Suicide Verdict on South African
From Our Correspondent — East Grinstead, Sept. 4 [1968]
A verdict of suicide was recorded at an East Grinstead inquest today on a South African, Johannes Hermanus Scheepers, aged 29, described on his alien registration card as a student of scientology.
Mr. Scheepers was said to have been staying at the home of Mr. David Gaiman, Harwood House South, Harwoods Lane, a mile from the scientologists’ international headquarters at Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead.
Mr. Gaiman, aged 35, a senior executive of the cult, denied on oath that the dead man had been student of scientology at Saint Hill.
Asked by Dr. Angus Summerville, the East Sussex coroner, why Mr. Scheepers had come to Britain, Mr. Gaiman said: "I assume that he came to gamble. That was the activity that took his interest."
Mr. Gaiman said he was introduced to Mr. Scheepers two-and-a-half months ago. Mr. Scheepers had stayed at his house in Harwoods Lane for a short time and then left, saying he was going to Brighton.
On Thursday evening, August 29, Mr. Scheepers arrived at his house and said he was flying back to South Africa on Saturday. A bed was wade up for him. "Scheepers had mentioned casually to my wife that his gambling system had broken down, and from that I gathered the impression he was broke", Mr. Gaiman said.
Police-constable Albert Walker said Mr. Scheepers was found on August 31 in a car parked in Harwoods Lane.
A plastic pipe wedged into the exhaust entered the car by a window. Dr. Albert Sachs, a pathologist said the cause of death was carbon monoxide poisoning.
Police-constable Colin Daffiest, the coroner’s officer, said Mr. Scheepers left two letters, saying he was going to take his own life and that this had nothing to do with scientology or being a member of the group. His flight back to South Africa had been cancelled.
After the inquest Mr. Gaiman said a check had shown that Mr. Scheepers had not been registered at any scientology establishment in Britain.
Even today, 45 years later, David Gaiman’s denials that Scheepers was in any way connected to Scientology seem problematic, as does the notion that Scheepers would have exonerated Scientology in a suicide note and also bothered to cancel his flight home.

In Gaiman’s book, it’s an unnamed opal miner from South Africa who kills himself in the same way after briefly coming to board at the home of the narrator.

The opal miner has left behind two suicide notes (we hear about them from the Hempstocks, who mysteriously seem to know about them), and the notes blame the opal miner’s despair on his bad luck in gambling.

In a strange way, it’s as if Neil Gaiman, in his novel, is providing support for his father’s real-life assertion that the suicide, Scheepers, had died because of gambling, and not because of his involvement with Scientology.
Extra fascinating info;

David Gaiman died in 2009 at the age of 75. While he was alive, he was known as a pugnacious promoter of Scientology. He was an unindicted co-conspirator (along with L. Ron Hubbard himself) when 11 Scientology executives were prosecuted for the largest infiltration of the US government in its history. From 1973 until the church was raided by the FBI in 1977, Scientology’s spy wing, the Guardian’s Office, sent operatives to infiltrate hundreds of government offices around the world to pilfer files about the church.

Gaiman rose to be the Guardian’s Office top public relations official in the world. His own contribution to the GO’s many plots was dreaming up “Operation Cat,” a scheme to plant false information in the files of US government agencies and then expose it using Freedom of Information Act requests. Gaiman’s plans for Operation Cat were among the documents seized in the 1977 raid.

David and his wife Sheila also had a very good thing going after they founded a vitamin supply business, G & G Vitamins, in 1965. It became a lucrative concern as it supplied Saint Hill Manor, where some of Scientology’s processes call for huge intakes of vitamins. (Last year, Sheila Gaiman was featured in a Scientology flier which listed her as a “New Civilization Founder” in its fundraising for new buildings, indicating that she’s personally given at least $1 million.)

But David Gaiman’s career in the church did not go without a hitch. In the early 1980s, there was a purge of old Guardian’s Office executives as Scientology tried to distance itself from the disastrous prosecution of officials involved in Operation Snow White.

In 1983, David was expelled from the church and “declared” a “suppressive person” — Scientology’s form of excommunication. His declare is online, and it not only lists the usual complaints — that Gaiman supplanted Hubbard’s methods with his own, making him a “squirrel” (a heretic) — but also accused him of “a history of sexual misconduct…He has engaged in this while legally married in disregard of Church policy on this matter.” (He later managed to get back in the church’s good graces.)

For what it’s worth, in Neil’s novel the narrator’s father is seduced by the evil governess, Ursula Monkton, carrying on an affair while his wife spends evenings in town.

However, as Gaiman makes clear in the acknowledgments at the end of his book, the family in the novel is not his family in real life. But he also makes an interesting note about how his sister helped him mine the past…

The family in this book is not my own family, who have been gracious in letting me plunder the landscape of my own childhood and watched as I liberally reshaped those places into a story. I’m grateful to them all, especially to my youngest sister, Lizzy, who encouraged me and sent me long-forgotten memory-jogging photographs.
Lizzy Calcioli is an ardent Scientologist who has completed courses up to the present day, according to Scientology’s own publications.


In 2011, the UK’s Channel 4 featured Calcioli in a short film talking about the virtues of Scientology’s silent childbirth. She talks about the noise in other parts of a maternity ward, and how she didn’t want for that to be the “welcome” that her five children experienced.


(Media player not cooperating, nor English)


However, Calcioli never explains why Scientologists seek a silent environment for childbirth: Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard believed that things said while a child is being born would be soaked up by the child’s “reactive mind” and could harm them for the rest of their lives. Hubbard’s book Dianetics is filled with examples of the way a sperm cell, egg, or fetus could absorb things that were said near them while they were “unconscious” and have them manifest as illnesses or neuroses decades later.

Neil Gaiman is also still close with his ex-wife Mary McGrath, whom he met when she was a Scientology student at Saint Hill Manor and lodging in a house owned by Neil’s father. In 1985, they were married and had their first child. (Gaiman and McGrath were divorced in 2008.)

To this day, Gaiman lives in Minnesota because he wanted to remain close to McGrath and their three children as they were growing up.

As we reported recently, Mary McGrath is still so involved in Scientology she’s become the executive director of the church’s “Ideal Org” in St. Paul. McGrath has given large donations to Scientology, and some have suggested that Neil is still, through McGrath, giving money to, and is involved in, the church.

But we haven’t seen anything to convince us that Gaiman is involved in the donations made by his ex-wife.

Mary McGrath recently turned up in a video put together by the St. Paul Ideal Org which encouraged Scientologists from Kansas City to come up to Minnesota for a fundraiser. She shows up with 2:33 on the counter, calling herself “the ED Day”…


(Same media player no cooperate)


Mary_Gaiman

As this evidence shows, Neil Gaiman has been surrounded by fanatical Scientologists all of his life, from his father, who spoke for Scientology as its UK mouthpiece, to his sisters, his mother, and his ex-wife.
There's nothing cut and dry, merely an unavoidable imbalance in proportion of motivations and history of duplicitous coordinated behaviours/activism.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Cicada 5

Elite Member
Apr 16, 2015
3,088
1,659
118
Country
Nigeria
Caroline Wallner is one of several women who have accused author Neil Gaiman of sexual abuse, as detailed in both the Vulture report and the Tortoise Media podcast. Wallner is the woman who, along with her husband and three children, lived on Gaiman’s property. After her marriage ended, Gaiman allegedly began pressuring her for sex in exchange for allowing her to remain on the land. At one point, she claims, he attempted to have sex with her while her four-year-old son was in the bed.

Wallner later signed an NDA, reportedly in exchange for $300,000, and was asked to leave.


Now, Gaiman is suing her. Not for defamation (likely a losing battle), but for $500,000 for allegedly violating the NDA. It’s a classic tactic: using legal threats to silence accusers. Gaiman claims Wallner breached confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses by speaking to Vulture and other outlets. He’s seeking arbitration—even though Wallner actually sued him first, last winter, alleging that he breached the same NDA by failing to delete text messages, photos, and videos as required.

According to Vulture, Wallner’s attorney finds it “unusual” that Gaiman would pursue an NDA case under these circumstances. “When you’re trying to silence someone who’s alleging really heinous acts,” the attorney said, “everyone thinks, Oh, the allegation must be true. I would think he may have come to the conclusion he has nothing left to lose.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan