My guess: alliteration. "Draconian DRM" just rolls off the tongue. Or in this case, keyboard.DustyDrB said:Random observation: The only time I ever hear/see the word "draconian" is when people are talking about DRM.
My guess: alliteration. "Draconian DRM" just rolls off the tongue. Or in this case, keyboard.DustyDrB said:Random observation: The only time I ever hear/see the word "draconian" is when people are talking about DRM.
Better than anyone else's? Really? Pfft.CleverNickname said:I don't know what the fuss is about. UPlay is basically just a launcher, we've had those for ages.
And at least with Ubisoft games I don't have to tell my Logitech gamepad to pretend to be a 360 controller. That alone makes Ubi's PC versions 10 times better than anyone else's.
Then you clearly don't watch politics.DustyDrB said:Random observation: The only time I ever hear/see the word "draconian" is when people are talking about DRM.
That was a BIG laugh! Thanks for thatKahunaburger said:![]()
The top one is Ubisoft's business model in a nutshell.
They don't really get that the only people seriously inconvenienced by more draconian DRM are paying customers. No matter what your DRM does, pirates only have to download the crack once.
Games for Windows Live, Microsoft's widely hated attempt at buying into the digital distribution market.Tinybear said:GFWL?Thoric485 said:Pah. Shovelware, misguided reboots, worst site and in-game service since GFWL, DLC all over the place. That's Ubisoft for ya.
Rayman Origins was an amazing little game and they launched it inbetween the year's biggest releases with a 60$ price tag.
I swear, the only reason they aren't as hated as Activision/EA is that they're incompetent rather than greedy.
Well done sir, well done.Kahunaburger said:![]()
The top one is Ubisoft's business model in a nutshell.
They don't really get that the only people seriously inconvenienced by more draconian DRM are paying customers. No matter what your DRM does, pirates only have to download the crack once.
I watch politics and "draconian" comes up less than a pro-democrat argument on Fox News.Mycroft Holmes said:Then you clearly don't watch politics.DustyDrB said:Random observation: The only time I ever hear/see the word "draconian" is when people are talking about DRM.
You're right on about that...at least for the last two years. Got too sick of the lies and fear-mongering.Mycroft Holmes said:Then you clearly don't watch politics.DustyDrB said:Random observation: The only time I ever hear/see the word "draconian" is when people are talking about DRM.
Even if Ubisoft are "learning" (highly dubious), they still slander PC gamers and have shitty customer service. They make EA look good, that's how bad they are.Danoloto said:Original post would have helped more if he had also mentioned the game in question.
I have bought Anno 2070 back in november, and have only once had trouble with not being able to connect. However I could still play it, and halfway through my session it logged me back in to uplay. Sure it's not the best service around, but as far as I can tell they are already on the retreat from what they were doing with Assassins creed, where you had to had a permanent connection, and as soon as your internet dropped you were f*****.
But I would like to go further in defending Ubisoft. They have actually learnt what internet DRM can be good for, because by being connected to Uplay you actually get bonus stuff that you can't get when you're offline, so you actually get something in return this time for getting the real thing instead of going ARRRRRRR and using a torrent (AKA piracy).
My previous game from ubi was From Dust, and that was horrible on multiple levels. The mentioned DRM was much more irritating (they did remove the most restrictive part in the first patch, just days after launch...), and it was just a mediocre game in general. But Ubi is learning, and going "omg I bought a game, had a bad experiance and you should all never buy from them again" is not enough information to make me stop buying.
I bought Heroes of Might and Magic VI. It doesn't only need uplay to play online, but to log into the account system in the game itself, which also is unstable at times. So, I have two services that both need to be functional for me to have my savegames up and running for the single player campaign. I have now asked for a refund, although I loved the game, I will rather not that they get the money for it.Danoloto said:Original post would have helped more if he had also mentioned the game in question.
I have bought Anno 2070 back in november, and have only once had trouble with not being able to connect. However I could still play it, and halfway through my session it logged me back in to uplay. Sure it's not the best service around, but as far as I can tell they are already on the retreat from what they were doing with Assassins creed, where you had to had a permanent connection, and as soon as your internet dropped you were f*****.
But I would like to go further in defending Ubisoft. They have actually learnt what internet DRM can be good for, because by being connected to Uplay you actually get bonus stuff that you can't get when you're offline, so you actually get something in return this time for getting the real thing instead of going ARRRRRRR and using a torrent (AKA piracy).
My previous game from ubi was From Dust, and that was horrible on multiple levels. The mentioned DRM was much more irritating (they did remove the most restrictive part in the first patch, just days after launch...), and it was just a mediocre game in general. But Ubi is learning, and going "omg I bought a game, had a bad experiance and you should all never buy from them again" is not enough information to make me stop buying.