New Wonder Drug Kills Almost Any Virus

Jegsimmons

New member
Nov 14, 2010
1,748
0
0
its the fucking rage virus i tells yah!!!

it will infect the monkeys makeing them super smart and haveing them cause other species to gain intelligence. then humanity will have to fight for survival with reptiles, cats, dogs, and parakeets being our only allies!!!


.....and then the alien shark people come to feed.....
 

frago roc

New member
Aug 13, 2009
205
0
0
spartan231490 said:
frago roc said:
spartan231490 said:
Honestly, I'm curious how this drug knows which RNA strands come from the virus and which just naturally come from cells? Sounds like it would be some very interesting science.
Simple: Humans don't naturally have double stranded RNA in their cells.
Oh, I didn't notice that it only attacked double stranded RNA, but what about RNA strands that double back on themselves. That's very common in human cells. I would assume it has something to do with length of the strand.
From what I gathered from the snippet, DRACO combines with cellular proteins that are already present in the cell for defence - they simply add the programmed cell death feature when they are activated. I assume the natural proteins have some crazy mechanism to determine that they are indeed intruding molecules.
 

Nudu

New member
Jun 1, 2011
318
0
0
Wait, WHAT!?! If this actually provides a cure for viruses, wouldn't that make this the greatest medical discovery since pencilin?
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
Um... you don't kill viruses. Viruses aren't alive. I know its a minor point but it's probably the most interesting and important part of viruses.

I'll be interested in seeing if this actually works for the supposed range of virus (its seems unlikely since there are so many different strains of viruses). Hopefully it eliminates viruses from the world but it could just as easy not be anywhere near as good as they say.

Also, lol at people saying why would drug companies let that happen. This was developed by MIT, i.e. scientists that cure disease for the fame. Whether it gets on the market is another issue.
 

Savvz

New member
Mar 9, 2010
60
0
0
There is no money in a cure, especially one this useful. We will never see this drug mass produced.
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
Earnest Cavalli said:
DRACO could quite literally be the fabled "cure for the common cold."
Oh - I don't know - a Cure to AIDS!

"We've found the cure to cancer... but more importantly it also gets rid of unsightly moles"
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
Zaik said:
Seems like "Drug that kills any cell any virus could ever use" isn't exactly a large leap from just a drug that indiscriminately kills cells.

But I'm not a doctor or a biologist or a...doctologist. Or whatever.
Yeah, except the whole DISCRIMINATION part!
 

Logic 0

New member
Aug 28, 2009
1,676
0
0
This sounds like a great idea there's no way that this can backfire horribly and make murderous zombies.
 

OldNewNewOld

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,494
0
0
Sorry to sat that, but I don't trust anything that is supposed to be a wonder medicine for "everything", even if that "everything" is just referred to "most viruses".

Until it's proven to work on living humans and does not have a "it could accidentally make half your brain cells go "boom"" side effect, I won't trust a word from this article.
 

Salad Is Murder

New member
Oct 27, 2007
520
0
0
SmashLovesTitanQuest said:
M920CAIN said:
Does it cure cancer, aids, whateva? if not... meh.
Cancer is not a virus sucker.

Seriously though, correct me if im wrong on this, but I can imagine that your common, run of the mill flu virus probably kills more people each year than cancer. Obviously that figure is a bit screwed by old people whos immune system is virtually none existent and little kids in Africa who cant have a drink without catching some nasty illness but still.
Still, it could have a relevant application on cancer treatment if it's something that's targeting cellular apoptosis. Honestly though, a big problem with Africa has less to do with available and existent cures than it does with the public health infrastructure.
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
I see a whole lot of posting by people who know little to nothing about microbiology and medicine, very arrogantly proclaiming that this will go horribly awry and make life miserable/impossible for us in the future, or that we're upsetting the natural order of things, as if by building cities, cultivating the land and flying over the oceans in huge machines we have not been doing so for quite some time. A retrovirus cure must by nature be very different from an antibiotic, and I doubt KFC's going to start pumping their chickens full of them. Also, where is the umbrage over stem cell research from the people claiming that this bug-killer is the harbinger of the apocalypse?

In his last book, Vonnegut wrote about a doctor who predated Joseph Lister (as in "Listerine"), who himself popularized handwashing before and between surgeries. The doc, who's name I don't recall, noticed that mothers and children were dying during childbirth when the other docs performed the deliveries immediately after coming out of the morgue. For suggesting they clean their hands, that doctor was pushed out of his profession and his country. I think that mindset is what I'm seeing here.

Also, in case anyone is wondering, zombies aren't terraforming and cloning. They're not real and they're not a potential reality.
 

Mannayz

New member
May 6, 2010
263
0
0
Hey, when they get the 'supposedly destructive kinks' worked out of this, I'd be all for it. I love science and all its future endeavors into the unknown.

And if we do wind up having this treatment, make sure to play this in the background...

 

frago roc

New member
Aug 13, 2009
205
0
0
Nudu said:
Wait, WHAT!?! If this actually provides a cure for viruses, wouldn't that make this the greatest medical discovery since pencilin?
But it's not ALL viruses.

Twilight_guy said:
Um... you don't kill viruses. Viruses aren't alive. I know its a minor point but it's probably the most interesting and important part of viruses.
It's actually a huge debate whether viruses are considered living or not. What it really boils down to is what are the conditions for something to be alive? Some acedemics believe that replication must occur with one's own machinery to constitute life. Or that exchange of nutrients must occur. Others however broaden the scope to include anything that replication, regardless of how or whether machinery is hi-jacked. It's a really interesting debate and I enjoy reading opinions regarding it.
 

tombman888

New member
Jul 12, 2009
1,394
0
0
"New drug that kills almost any Virus?
My father will hear about this!"

Glad i'm not the only one who though of Malfoy after reading XD
 

averydeeadaccount

New member
Aug 12, 2011
77
0
0
Ghengis John said:
Like every other medical treatment this'll do great things for the living standard of the wealthy though. I'd say its a good time to be rich, but it's rarely a bad time to be rich.
it`s a great time for free health care, Australia FTW!!11one!!1!
 

smiley92

New member
Jul 25, 2008
18
0
0
Rin Little said:
It says almost all viruses, that makes me curious as to which ones specifically they're anticipating it wouldn't work against and why. I'm going to assume the ones that replicate themselves so quickly that they do enough damage in such a short time that the DRACO would be largely ineffective against it.
They are actually talking abotu the ones that aren't having a double-stranded RNA as an intermediate messenger or genome stocking macromolecule (like retroviruses, which includes AIDS... it basically transforms it's SINGLE stranded RNA in DNA and injects it's genome in yours after a lot of mutations which make it untraceable by your immune system... which is why AIDS can't currently be cured) so the "exception" is actually about "families" of viruses than specific cases... And I don,t want to be a joy killer but there are a lot of them. And even if we happen to success in stoping proliferation of all the other viruses, mutations will happen, as it always does, and new kind of supervirus could only come up as the new surviving strands... trying to stop thing like they currently are is NOT a solution and everyone in the scientific community is aware of that. Finding a cure to a single strand (like H1N1 last year) IS a good idea, but trying to erradicate the "virus phenomenon" is jsut stupid considering what we actually know in virology and molecular mechanistics of evolution.

(By the way I'm not some jerk comming up with random stuff I actually am a biochemist with a formation in microbiology and virology)