Would you like to know more?Fostaar said:no! it was an advertisement... from the futureusmarine4160 said:So Starship Troopers was a documentary from the future?
Paul Verhoeven is a time-traveler damn it!usmarine4160 said:So Starship Troopers was a documentary from the future?
Why else would the Shire of Esperance in Western Australia have fined NASA for littering when Skylab came down around Perth?English Stew said:snip
The fact is, nothing we make that isn't designed for re-entry would survive the immense deceleration caused by moving from vacuum to atmosphere. The reason NASA said not to worry about the satellite is that they knew it would just burn up just like everything that isn't hard as a rock and thick enough to with-stand having it's outer layers boiled off.
snip
Oh.ravensheart18 said:You really don't know what you are talking about do you? NASA detailed a list of parts on that particular bird that would probably survive reentry. More than one satalite has hit the earth with sizable pieces making it through the atmosphere.English Stew said:The fact is, nothing we make that isn't designed for re-entry would survive the immense deceleration caused by moving from vacuum to atmosphere. The reason NASA said not to worry about the satellite is that they knew it would just burn up just like everything that isn't hard as a rock and thick enough to with-stand having it's outer layers boiled off.
Would you like to know more? About your own future that is?Nouw said:Paul Verhoeven is a time-traveler damn it!usmarine4160 said:So Starship Troopers was a documentary from the future?