Gizmo1990 said:
I am not a HP fan these days but I do have a question for people who still are. Were any of you asking for this? I was under the impression that Umbridge was not even a character people liked to hate, they simply hated her. Or have I simply missed something and there is a massive fanbase for this character that I have been completly unaware of?
I am all for authors doing side stories on characters who are not central to the main story, as a fan of the Dresden Files I have been able to enjoy a number of side stories from the POV of characters other than Harry Dresden but Jim Butcher wrote these stories about popular characters.
Harry Potter is a BIG business, I've managed to get to Universal Studios: Orlando twice, including once this year while moving (planned vacation ahead of time for right in the midst of our moving plans) I've seen both Hogsmeade and Diagon Alley opening year... not sure when if ever I'll get a chance to get back (hint if you visit though: Butterbeer is good, but the Fishy Green Ale is overlooked and is something everyone should try at least once). With Universal Studios full tilt behind it, and now competing more successfully with Disney than ever before (or so they claim) they have interests in wanting to see more done with the IP, and move things forward, especially as the actors themselves are aging and are a big part of creating the material. It wouldn't surprise me that a good choice for promoting a new villain would be Dolores since she's a hated bad guy, but someone who wouldn't have been purged as of the end of the stories so far.
At any rate, I'm guessing the idea of doing this new movie trilogy (or just one movie) is probably going to be to produce new material for Universal to exploit, assuming it's in as a producer it will wind up getting both the profits from the movies (guaranteed the first time) and fodder for their theme park. Rumor had it when I was just there that they were already planning on doing another Harry Potter expansion now that this one had opened, they are apparently about to lose the Marvel "Island Of Adventure" when the contract expires, and the wording of their contract prevents them from doing a whole lot with it without Disney's permission. They just "bridged" their two parts (Islands and Universal Studios) with the Hogwart's express, and allegedly they wanted to try and do some kind of new nature safari thing to compete with Disney's version. It just "clicked" that if they went with this magical beasts concept they could knock over Marvel and some of the other aging portions of Islands Of Adventure and build it there and build some kind of animatronic safari-themed area based on the new movies. Say they get the next section up and running in 4 years (which is what Diagon alley took, it's where Jaws used to be), coordinate it with a movie release, and then they get the advertising and can expand every 2-3 years when the other parts of the trilogy comes out.... speculation of course, but it fits with some of the rumors I heard while there.
At the end of the day I like her work, but I have little respect for JK Rowling nowadays as she seems to be increasingly in the "anything for more fame and money" category. I didn't care for how she went about "outing" Dumbledore... no he's not gay... well if any character was gay it would be him... okay he's gay... all gradually done
as she felt out the crowd to make the most popular decision. What she did there (making him gay) wasn't a big deal (even for someone with my attitudes) so much as the way she went about it. At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if JK Rowling's plans are entirely based on other people's ambitions and how much money they are going to pay her. She also appears to be selling off pieces of the HP universe piecemeal to Universal Studios if nothing else, for example they have a "Trademark" on Butterbeer right now (which is a soda combining shortbread and butterscotch) and apparently the recipe is proprietary to the park.