ellers07 said:
I enjoyed Signs and I would even go so far as to say I liked The Village and Lady in the Water. Yes, The Village wasn't quite up to par, but it had a fun Twilight Zone sort of feel to it and I didn't think it was boring. I know almost everyone hates Lady in the Water, but on it's own I think it's kind of a cool fairytale story. If you can look past the casting of himself and the behind the scenes nonsense, it's a decent little movie.
The Happening and Last Airbender I have no excuse for and can't find any redeeming qualities. Those are awful.
Yay! I'm not the only one! Sometimes it feels like all the movie reviewers are too close to view things objectively. I knew nothing about behind-the-scenes troubles with The Village and Lady in the Water, and enjoyed both. Here is my take on their bad reviews, and how to make them more enjoyable...
The Village - People seemed to think this was a 'scary movie'. They were disappointed by the lackluster twist and the 'monsters' being staged. But that was never the point of the movie. It's not a movie to create fear, but rather a movie about fear, and how people are affected by it. In the story, fear was the foundation of the village. And that fear has seeped into the entire culture of the place. It's about how fear paralyzes and about how being brave is not about 'not being scared', but instead about finding the strength to act despite your fear. Both Ivy and Lucius demonstrate that.
Lady in the Water - MovieBob's review of this actually annoys me. All the critics focus on is 'the critic' and 'the writer', like there is nothing else. The writer (played by Shyamalan) was not a messiah. His fate is to
inspire a leader, a messiah, but he will never live to see it. You're reading too much into it and taking personal insult and that is affecting your opinion.
Rewatch it, but look at the movie as a commentary on self-belief and potential. There is a great diaspora of characters from different ages, cultures, races and backgrounds (a definite plus), who all doubt themselves. The nymph doubts her ability to fulfill her purpose. The doctor has lost belief in his role as a healer. The writer doubts the import of his book, and his sister doubts her chance of finding love. The father of the symbolist believes his son's gift is just a quirk. There are more. All these people in the apartment complex who don't believe they have any part to play in any stories, but in the end, they all do. The critic represents the people who 'already know the ending', so don't even try (ie: people who are critical and negative), and yet he dies because what he though he knew, he didn't. If you want to sum up the 'message', it is to take the chances that come your way, because you might be a big part of a story you just don't know about yet.