inu-kun said:
Interesting article... Until the part that looks for sexism in a show for little kids.
I'll ignore that time that a kid's show directly mentioned sexism (Sorry, about the fanart rather than an image from the show. It's all I could find on short notice):
I'll ignore those times sexism was a topic [http://38.media.tumblr.com/31ec5eedc5e7dc6c56349eb30af1fb91/tumblr_n90zqso3Gc1ruepzno2_250.gif] later [http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v114/Snake101/Avatar/Aang/Book%20One/Chapter%20Four/s01e04grab14850.jpg] on [http://37.media.tumblr.com/76abf539a6802c37f920465cdc5ff813/tumblr_n90zqso3Gc1ruepzno7_250.gif] as well.
Now, you're welcome to argue that
Avatar: The Last Airbender had and still has a following among an older demographic, but it was still classified as a kid's cartoon and put on a network that tries to attract kids. Obviously, this is in the opposite direction of being a sexist show, but it does demonstrate, whether in a positive light or not, sexism does get brought up in kid's shows. When discussing the universe of ATLA the creators have also brought up how sexism has seeped into kid's shows as well. It's not like it doesn't happen.
You can argue whether Bob is grasping at straws with TMNT, but don't try to disregard his argument by acting as if it's not a legitimate thing that happens in kid's shows just because they're for kids, a byproduct of critic over-analysis and nothing more. It does happen. It's kind of insulting to kids honestly to say their entertainment must
always be so pandering and so underwhelming it can't even have a semblance of issues of that seriousness or complexity. It's that kind of mindset that leads to so many terrible shows for kids who are craving something more.