I think this is the big thing. Nintendo has to hit the right price point. $199 would be ideal, but it absolutely cannot cost more than $249. If it does, it's likely to make the Wii U look like a successful console.JUMBO PALACE said:IF the price point is low enough I'd still consider it if they're more generous with the games than they were with the Wii U. The fact that there was no proper Zelda on the console and the only Starfox was a remake with forced in motion controls is just a travesty.
I think this is one reason that Nintendo chose the X1 chip to begin with. They have to have a price point in mind they want to hit, and keeping costs down will be a paramount consideration, I am sure.
All evidence at this point seems to lean toward the chip that was thought to be called X2 is one of two things. Either a heavily modified X1 that is only used in the Switch, or a cancelled update to the X1. The newest Tegra in the works now is the P1, based on the Pascal architecture.Kahani said:Of course, the problem with such speculation is that there's no evidence that anything called "Tegra X2" exists at all. In fact, the only evidence for it is the same speculation claiming that the Nintendo NX will use it. And yes, the fact that it was still referred to as the NX should tell you just how reliable and up-to-date that speculation was.