It doesn't matter if the game is 3rd-party or 1st-party, it's the game that matters.Yoshi178 said:
Sports games usually scale well to old hardware compared to other games like say how poor last-gen versions of Dragon Age Inquisition, Watch Dogs, Shadow of Mordor, etc. Sports games have a very small game world (the court, field, etc.) and always a set number of characters on screen at once.Ellux said:
That is a flawed argument, because most people don't get to buy multiple consoles. 3rd party games are a big boon to people when it comes to choosing a console to be their SOLE console. Because it allows people to make a decision based on the exclusives that they want to play most without having to sacrifice not being able to play the 3rd party games that they also want to play.Yoshi178 said:
phoenix literally just said it doesn't matter if the games are 1st party or 3rd Party though. Nintendo's 1st party and exclusive games support is much better than what Sony and MS have so if you want 3rd party just play them on PC and bam, you then already have 90% of the PS4 and Xbox One libraries.CritialGaming said:
He was referring to the shooters I believe, but his phrasing is bad.Yoshi178 said:
Now that is unfair. I am always willing to hear the points and discuss things with the other side of any given argument. But you haven't offered any of that. Instead you reply with childish responses like, "Why do you wanna know?" "It doesn't matter so I'm not answering that." And on and on. Several people in this thread have trying to give you the benefit of the doubt and provide you with the options to express your reasoning, but you have offered nothing.Yoshi178 said:
and Switch s already doing much better in the 3rd party department. sure alot of the 3rd Party games are ports, but that's because devs are clearly texting the waters on switch first before they fully commit to throwing their full development support costs onto the system. after the low sales of the Wii U can you really blame them?CritialGaming said:
I said the GAMES matter (meaning the entire library), I said I just got Danganronpa and Shadow Tactics (both 3rd party games the Switch ain't getting). I care about a system having an abundant amount of good games regardless if those games are 1st or 3rd party. Sony puts out more 1st-party games than Nintendo and MS combined. Let me know when the Switch has 1st-party support just comparable to Horizon and The Last Guardian. Even if I was into Nintendo franchises, there's literally no reason to buy a Switch yet as I can play Zelda on WiiU and I can play Splatoon on WiiU without a stupid phone app. I prefer playing on a console vs a PC (my PC doesn't even have a video card) and now with so many PC games coming to consoles (not the Switch obviously) from Witcher 3 to Shadow Tactics to Divinity OS/Pillars of Eternity to Cities: Skylines, what does the PC really have over a PS4 anyway? I guess like Shadowrun but like ANY PC can play that.Yoshi178 said:
The Switch doesn't have 3rd-party support and never will because it can't play current games. The Switch can't even get a port of the DS series Zero Escape, it can't get indies, etc. The fact that you think any pub/dev is going to fully commit to the Switch borders on insanity. The best support the Switch will get is if it takes over the portable market getting portable-level commitment from 3rd-parties.Yoshi178 said:
Very debatable. It comes down to personal preference, but here's a quick snippit from Wikipedia:Yoshi178 said:
LMAO, Breath of the Wild is on WiiU... It's the equivalent of saying you need a PS4 for TLOU. We've already been through how review scores don't matter as GTAV is shit to you and is tied with your precious BotW on Metacritic.Yoshi178 said:as you wish.Phoenixmgs said:
not really. i'll let Richard from ReviewtechUSA explain it to you.Phoenixmgs said:
Splatoon 2 and Mario + Rabbids Kingdom battle already have higher metacritic scores than the Last Guardian and are both exclusive to Switch though.Phoenixmgs said:
What's with you and game scores, game journalism and criticism is a joke. Score doesn't even factor in when deciding to buy a game or not unless it actually scores under an 80, then I do some quick research to find if there's anything majorly wrong with the game as it's quite an "accomplishment" for a game to score under 80 nowadays. Also, if a game scores mid to upper 90s, then I'm also pretty suspect because those type games don't have a good track history with me as something that is fresh or unique (what I look for) rarely caters to everyone.Yoshi178 said:Splatoon 2 and Mario + Rabbids Kingdom battle already have higher metacritic scores than the Last Guardian and are both exclusive to Switch though.Phoenixmgs said:
Super Mario Odyssey is also releasing next month and i'm willing to bet that that game will receive a higher metacritic score than Uncharted 4.
but of course since we aren't using metacritic scores to determine quality, i can also say that ARMS is on the Last Guardians and Uncharted 4's level of quality too despite it only receiving a 77/100 metacritic score
well as we've already clarified. quality is completely subjective and i don't consider alot of the PS4 games that you consider to be good "quality" to be so. The Last Guardian? LMAO! you mean the game that with bad controls and revolves around trying to tell your Griffin friend to do stuff but like a dog, he doesn't listen and usually does the complete opposite thing to what you actually want him to do?Phoenixmgs said:
