Nintendo Switch Won't Have a Web Browser at Launch

Callate

New member
Dec 5, 2008
5,118
0
0
I have to confess that the biggest use I make of the Wii-U is Netflix. And after I'm done watching something on Netflix with friends, sometimes someone will want to look up something about an actor or series, or play a YouTube clip of something tangentially related.

Looking things up on the 'Net is something we can do, with a bit of hassle, on someone's phone. But as far as displaying anything on a decent-sized screen...

I'm not going to say that the Wii-U's browser is anything to write home about, but at least it's there. Having to juggle multiple devices just to look up a FAQ, or check the arrival time of your flight as you're going to the airport, or... what have you... That's dumb. Just unnecessary and dumb. Yes, some of these features you can do with the smartphone that almost everyone has, assuming you can get reception and/or an open Wi-Fi access point- but why should you have to? Why should you have to put down your $300+ device to fumble with the touch-screen on a much smaller device for such basic functionality?

All I can say is that I hope these missing features aren't missing for long, because their absence is a non-trivial blot.

C'mon, Nintendo. We're only asking you to join the latter twentieth century.

As far as comparisons to the XBox One go, though: Ah, no. Does not compare. People weren't angry that Microsoft was promoting online functionality; people were angry that Microsoft wanted to use online functionality to cripple their users' access to their purchased content for Microsoft's benefit, integrate their box into their TV-watching experience for features that most people with cable and/or DVR already possessed, and devoted significant portions of its processing power and RAM to doing so to the detriment of playing games. Apples and freaking oranges.
 

mtarzaim02

New member
Jan 23, 2014
86
0
0
50-bucks-shit-tablet does what Nintendon't.

Oh well.
It's not like we need to look at nintendo websites to earn freebies and pricecuts.
Or write on facebook how great their latest game is.
Nope. It's better for nintendo we waste our money on other devices than nintendo's.
 

Ecks

New member
Feb 9, 2017
7
0
0
goofsg said:
Ecks said:
goofsg said:
its a gaming console not an entertainment system if you want these features so bad there is the roku,apple tv and google chromcast its because of gamers like this why we got the horrendous xbox one

all i hear are skeptics, but i never hear the good things about the switch. no one mentions a year sub scription is going to be 17 dollars.
It is not going to be 17 dollars and you naive to even believe that.
The estimate was 17 to 30 dollars that's still better than paying 60. For a year
That's still worse than free like it's predecessors.
 

008Zulu_v1legacy

New member
Sep 6, 2009
6,019
0
0
Sight Unseen said:
I mean, even the PS4 and Xbox One can't run titles at 1080p 60fps...
True, however both Microsoft and Sony never implied that that's what the system was always going to be able to do.
 

SD-Fiend

Member
Legacy
Nov 24, 2009
2,075
0
1
Country
United States
mtarzaim02 said:
50-bucks-shit-tablet does what Nintendon't.

Oh well.
It's not like we need to look at nintendo websites to earn freebies and pricecuts.
Or write on facebook how great their latest game is.
Nope. It's better for nintendo we waste our money on other devices than nintendo's.
And It's not like you can't already do all of that much faster and easier on whatever device you are browsing the Escapist on.

I understand how bad it sounds for a portable wireless device to not have something as ubiquitous as an internet browser but at this point I'm not sure how this is more than a first world problem when nearly everything else in the standard household is conected to the internet in some way.
 

mtarzaim02

New member
Jan 23, 2014
86
0
0
Semi-DemiFiend said:
I understand how bad it sounds for a portable wireless device to not have something as ubiquitous as an internet browser but at this point I'm not sure how this is more than a first world problem when nearly everything else in the standard household is conected to the internet in some way.
I had some use for walkthrough dyuring my 300 hours of Xeno X.
And it's always nice to watch netflix on TV, then continue in your bed.
Usually, you want one device for all usages, not all devices of one usage.

Again, nintendo fails to understand the importance of multimedia device in the overall tech-appeal. Especially with Switch, where their new console will be perceived as less "powerful" than its predecessors, for its lack of now-common-and-cheap features.

It will also be an issue for devs.
Without browser, no link to their website, dedicated apps or social accounts. All will pass through Nintendo "benevolent" pipe.
 

Vyress

New member
Jul 12, 2010
87
0
0
I'm one of the very few people to actually not be affected by this tremendous oversight from Nintendo. To my own surprise, I found that when I start up a console, I usually use it to play games. I never noticed before. When I go on the internet, I use my pc or smartphone. Weird. I know. People avoid me for these quirks of mine.

As for the "portable consoles must have browser" argument - yes, of course. Cause we all use the browsers on our 3DSes and Vitas so much. Right. Typed this on my DS Lite btw - yeah, no. Just kidding. Thought I should tell you. Weird as I am, I actually used my pc for this.

Still, shame in Nintendo though. I hope the SwitchU will go with the times and at least be able to cool my drinks like the PS5 and Xbox4k will.