NIS America Pulls GaymerX Sponsorship, Devolver Digital Steps Forward - Update

UberPubert

New member
Jun 18, 2012
385
0
0
Dragonlayer said:
It is quite hard to keep up with who we're supposed to hate these days for social justice outrages. Hey, I just thought of something: Social Justice Outrages Maths! Use it to determine how many progressive directions you have to be seen to be pursuing to calm down the fanatics! Ergo, one GaymerX2 donation is equivalent to one rape scene and one set of Nazi imagery!
I think we can expand the operation a little further. Any donations to relevant groups can be registered as TumblrBux that grant the donator Internet Outrage Immunity for the immediate future.

TumblrBux are rendered null if the donating group does not contain at least one minority, and are nonrefundable in the event of vijda garmes jurnalists' ire being raised.
 

shintakie10

New member
Sep 3, 2008
1,342
0
0
Sucks for all involved here. You can definitely tell that NIS representative felt horrible about the situation, especially due to how quickly they helped to resolve it. Also felt bad for the GaymerX guys who got shorted due to the mistake NIS made.

Then that Matt Conn guy lost my pity when he claimed that this had to do with NIS attitude towards queer people.

Because obviously its because they hate gays and not because there was a breakdown in communication somewhere.

He's since deleted the tweets and apologized, but it still reeks of bullshit if you ask me.
 

Dragonlayer

Aka Corporal Yakob
Dec 5, 2013
971
0
0
UberPubert said:
Dragonlayer said:
It is quite hard to keep up with who we're supposed to hate these days for social justice outrages. Hey, I just thought of something: Social Justice Outrages Maths! Use it to determine how many progressive directions you have to be seen to be pursuing to calm down the fanatics! Ergo, one GaymerX2 donation is equivalent to one rape scene and one set of Nazi imagery!
I think we can expand the operation a little further. Any donations to relevant groups can be registered as TumblrBux that grant the donator Internet Outrage Immunity for the immediate future.

TumblrBux are rendered null if the donating group does not contain at least one minority, and are nonrefundable in the event of vijda garmes jurnalists' ire being raised.
That's brilliant! We just need to establish the relative worth of actions and TumblrBux: should there be a set price for outrages, based on the degree of their exclusion - "Didn't include a playable female character in your upcoming game? Hundred TBux please. No transethnic vegans? Ten thousand Bux." or should it fluctuate in response to whatever objective is currently "In" for the social justice crusaders crowd?
 

Shodanbot

New member
Apr 7, 2013
36
0
0
Don't understand this. I thought gaming conventions were about the hobby of gaming. Wouldn't think that there is an issue with rampant gay bashing at gaming conventions. Never been to one, so no experience in that area

zerragonoss said:
Here is the thing you are assuming for the community LGBTQ means its trying to promote equality and rights, and not just something for the community to get together and have fun like a normal convention. For exmaple gay bars are for the gay community but they are not activist in of themselves.
I go to gay bars to hook-up and given that it primarily caters to gay men and women, my chances look better than in a straight club. I'm not there for the crap music and the jacked prices for a snort of Jameson. I'm there because of pragmatism.

If you're gay, a gamer and fancy going to a convention with people who share your hobby, you'll probably tolerate the breeders for a couple of hours. ;-)
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
No offense here, but this strikes me as being pretty ridiculous. Despite what some "Theru-maniacs" might think it's not because this is a LGBTQ thing, but because the whole set up seems to be an affront to common sense. When looking at this I figured "okay, we've got a small minority of people who want to build a specialty con, nothing wrong with that", small cons that are just starting out pretty much need to rent a space, and maybe some tables and chairs and stuff if people can't donate them. That's how small cons start out. The big stuff happens once you find an interest, and get enough people where some of them can make increasingly larger investments. In this case it seems like it's some kind of attempt to want to jump right to "major con" status without having to do the slow, possibly decades long slog than many take when they are born of an idea, rather than created out of whole cloth by someone with deep pockets. GaymerX2 needs this money so they can fund a movie and a video game... going by the number this is what they want for their second con.

It's fine to head out and seek donations and sponsors and such, but if I'm understanding this right they're basically calling out NIS for not donating $3k to them. They want the money not so much because they need it to hold a con at all, but because they want to hold a really big con, and one where they will have their own movie to show and a video game to give away or whatever. NIS America has had trouble getting stuff out in the past it seems, and yet they are being held up because they aren't willing to finance someone else's game and movie development? On reading this I also have to wonder how many people who have donated know exactly what this money is being used for.

I don't know, to me it seems like a Con that is too big for it's own britches and getting too ambitious based on what the largest and most successful cons have done after years if not decades of operation (or a billionaire sponsor). I've heard about similar things before. Maybe if this was GaymerX19 I could see them shaming lost sponsors and thinking about product/feature development. A "2" Con strikes me as one that should be "woot! we've got a room, some tables and chairs, a few vendors agreed to show up, and we actually booked an industry speaker... we actually got to try running a con a second time".

But then again it's probably because having seen a few small cons and trade shows I feel it's a little disrespectful to those who fought their way up through a massive slog.

If Gaymer wants bigger exposure for political reasons, it's something I'd expect to attach onto a bigger con and perhaps finance it's own tented section or something. Nothing wrong with ambition, but calling out NIS (a dev I kind of like) for not being able to give you $3k for something like that... it gives me a bad taste in my mouth.
 

NiPah

New member
May 8, 2009
1,084
0
0
Therumancer said:
On reading this I also have to wonder how many people who have donated know exactly what this money is being used for.
The $3,000 was to sponsor a $15,000 open bar VIP party for con staff and people who spent $150 for a VIP ticket (or were one of the 100 people to buy at $95 via the kickstarter).
Source:
http://www.polygon.com/2014/7/28/5946619/gaymerx-nis-america-gaymerx2
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
NiPah said:
Therumancer said:
On reading this I also have to wonder how many people who have donated know exactly what this money is being used for.
The $3,000 was to sponsor a $15,000 open bar VIP party for con staff and people who spent $150 for a VIP ticket (or were one of the 100 people to buy at $95 via the kickstarter).
Source:
http://www.polygon.com/2014/7/28/5946619/gaymerx-nis-america-gaymerx2
Ahh okay, that clarifies things a bit more. I was confused because of what the original article mentioned their ongoing projects were. I'll also say that the link you sent actually makes things sound even more ridiculous to my way of thinking, especially seeing as they seem to be trying to imply it's an attack on gay people as part of the shaming process. At the end of the day NIS America is a fairly small publisher that gets a lot of crap, I still remember back how they released "Cross Edge" in the US and were doing a promotion for the updated "Dash" version coming out, only to be told at the very last second it wouldn't be getting a US release. It seems their Japanese division doesn't even taken them very seriously, and half the time it seems like they have to fight to get even a limited release of a lot of things they try to bring over. I could be wrong, but I can see why $3k is a big deal to them, and really their internal communications have never been a strong point since in following them half the time they seem to have no idea what's going on with their own company. I'm wondering if at this point what they actually committed to and what they knew at the time. $3K for a VIP Bar largely serving con staff strikes me as being even more ridiculous for a newbie specialty con than the projects I thought were being collected for which were at least something for the con and con goers themselves even if over the top for this one's level of establishment.

It will be interesting if we ever get to hear NIS's side of the story, which I doubt we will. Truthfully though, I think this shouldn't be given much more attention or coverage until that happens. It just seems kind of hokey to me, and while The Escapist wasn't bad in their coverage, the link you put up makes it seem even more like an attack/shaming attempt when we just don't have the whole story.

I mean seriously if someone told me "well yeah, we want $3k from you for booze for our con staff and a bunch of big donators. We'll tell everyone the drinks are from NIS America" from people running their second con, I'd tell them to go pound sand, no matter what they were representing. I could be wrong, but I just can't see NIS with it's problems having given a strong commitment to something like that, no matter who was running the con, given the very limited exposure and so on, especially seeing as it's a kind of frivolous expense, the kind of thing you do at cons like this mostly once your big and established to show off. Most new cons don't provide much to the staff at all, and are lucky if someone can set up a counter and write "Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster" on the outside of the Styrofoam cups.

Combined with my previous posts, you might (correctly) get the impression I don't have a lot of respect for this. I don't hit a lot of cons, but having seen what small ones do when starting out, and having attended some local game fests (PnP RPG conventions) and things like that over the years and seen what some of the people organizing those put together, especially when brand new. Not to mention when various cantons and stuff set out to do their first Renfaires through SCA or whatever, this strikes me as ridiculous. It seems to me that because the people involved are making this a "gay" con they expect to be projected right up into the fairly big time, as opposed to starting at the bottom, and working their way up, and they trying to use politics and shaming to get funding and such. The con is fine, but if this is your second outing and you've spent $90k and your basically approaching sponsors as opposed to having one set up as the original organizer, there is something deeply wrong with that... I don't care what cause they are representing. I've met people who would have literally given their left arm to have a third of that to put on an event, with the people involved literally doing everything they can to get or make the materials they need. "Oh my gawd, it's our second con and we don't have an open bar for con staff... boo hoo, it must be because of hatred towards gay people".

When they beg a town for permission to turn part of the green into medieval England for a weekend, build nearly everything they have, and drive around trying to collect as many people from local Cantons to show up, and hope that maybe people will notice the fliers and ads to come and visit, and do that for a few years, then maybe they'll deserve some credit. Right now it seems like a bunch of crybabies.
 

gyrobot_v1legacy

New member
Apr 30, 2009
768
0
0
LaochEire said:
gyrobot said:
Once again NISA shows how horrible they are as a game company, being the face of everything terrible involving Japanese gaming from pandering to creepers to localizing shovelware that should stayed in Japan while good games like Yakuza 5 never comes over.
NISA have been responsible for bringing over some of the best (critically) games out of Japan that many other publishers would not bother with. Also, Yakuza 5 is SEGA, not NISA and if you've seen the trailers for that game you'd see that it also appeals to the creepers.

TL;DR: You're talking out your arse.
IGN and Gamespot will gladly disagree with you. I may agree with you if you are talking their games back then but nowadays all I see from NISA is creeper trash.
 

UberPubert

New member
Jun 18, 2012
385
0
0
Dragonlayer said:
That's brilliant! We just need to establish the relative worth of actions and TumblrBux: should there be a set price for outrages, based on the degree of their exclusion - "Didn't include a playable female character in your upcoming game? Hundred TBux please. No transethnic vegans? Ten thousand Bux." or should it fluctuate in response to whatever objective is currently "In" for the social justice crusaders crowd?
I'm now imagining them as a Social Justice protection racket, old mob style "What's this? A skimpy outfit on a damsel in distress? That's gonna cost ya twice as much as last time. Not trying to be pushy, but accidents do happen... Say, that's a nice forum you got there. Would be a real shame if it burned down in a flamewar."
 

LaochEire

New member
Mar 9, 2010
104
0
0
gyrobot said:
LaochEire said:
gyrobot said:
Once again NISA shows how horrible they are as a game company, being the face of everything terrible involving Japanese gaming from pandering to creepers to localizing shovelware that should stayed in Japan while good games like Yakuza 5 never comes over.
NISA have been responsible for bringing over some of the best (critically) games out of Japan that many other publishers would not bother with. Also, Yakuza 5 is SEGA, not NISA and if you've seen the trailers for that game you'd see that it also appeals to the creepers.

TL;DR: You're talking out your arse.
IGN and Gamespot will gladly disagree with you. I may agree with you if you are talking their games back then but nowadays all I see from NISA is creeper trash.
I don't know what you mean with regards to IGN and Gamespot (honestly, could you explain that to me), but they do not publish creeper stuff. With the exception of Hyperdimention series which of their games within the last 12 months fall under this category? Danganronpa? Demon Gaze? Disgaea? Persona?

Also, could you please explain why a game like Yakuza 5, with advanced titty physics and comfort girls advertised as a core feature, does not fall into this category?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jFM1XzBpss (See 3.05-3.27, especially the latter part of that)
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
$3k = Chump Change. Not news.

But this was interesting to see a huge outcry over. Especially considering what the money was even for.
 

shintakie10

New member
Sep 3, 2008
1,342
0
0
Therumancer said:
It will be interesting if we ever get to hear NIS's side of the story, which I doubt we will. Truthfully though, I think this shouldn't be given much more attention or coverage until that happens. It just seems kind of hokey to me, and while The Escapist wasn't bad in their coverage, the link you put up makes it seem even more like an attack/shaming attempt when we just don't have the whole story.
NIS side of the story has been posted in this very thread. They had an internal communication error and didn't realize the 3 grand that they set aside for GaymerX2 was already set aside for something else. That's the end of it there. They could have continued on the discussion (which they eventually did) in a civil manner, but Matt Conn decided it'd be better to play the gay card and claim that it was probably because NIS was homophobic.
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
Sleekit said:
with only 5% or so of the population being...not straight...and being a self styled "gaming" being a subset of that...and being the kind of self styled "gaming" that would travel to go to a con being a subset of that...

not wanting to be down on anyone but i think the audience for this has gotta be rather on the small side...
It doesn't really matter what size this is. What matters is that the company promised it. So them deciding that the demographic is small would be irrelevant. FYI, 4% of the US population is LGBTQ. Don't know if that matters.

What's funny is that no one said that were with-holding the committed money because they got a case of the gay fears. Merely that they didn't contribute. Somehow, just because this conference was related to LGBT we somehow assumed that that meant the company was gay bashing and that's bullshit to assume when there's no reason that's related at all.

That'd be like saying the utility company shut off power to a gay person's house as if they did it because the person was gay and not because they failed to pay just like the company would do to any other non-paying customer.

Holy yellow journalism Batman (whichever source thought this was newsworthy to begin with). I mean, the money is going to fund a bar that the VIP members had to pay to get into. I wouldn't want to contribute money to that either if my goal was to help members of the LGBT community in some meaningful way.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
shintakie10 said:
Therumancer said:
It will be interesting if we ever get to hear NIS's side of the story, which I doubt we will. Truthfully though, I think this shouldn't be given much more attention or coverage until that happens. It just seems kind of hokey to me, and while The Escapist wasn't bad in their coverage, the link you put up makes it seem even more like an attack/shaming attempt when we just don't have the whole story.
NIS side of the story has been posted in this very thread. They had an internal communication error and didn't realize the 3 grand that they set aside for GaymerX2 was already set aside for something else. That's the end of it there. They could have continued on the discussion (which they eventually did) in a civil manner, but Matt Conn decided it'd be better to play the gay card and claim that it was probably because NIS was homophobic.
True, what I meant was I figured there was probably more to it than just what you heard there, since that seems to be what Gaymer is reporting what NIS said, I was thinking it wasn't a statement to the press directly from NIS giving their side of the story.

A lot of my rambling has largely been because while Gaymer's people seem to be presenting NIS as callous and perhaps bigoted, it also strikes me as a case where their demands for their con, and plans on how to use that money, are frankly ridiculous.

My personal guess would be NIS politely pulled out with a standard excuse when they found out Gaymer had $90k and wanted the extra money so the staffers could get loaded. Especially since $3k is probably a lot of money to NIS (compared to say Bioware).

But then again I admit part of it is that I like NIS and was just kind of hoping they would do more to fight back after the shaming and call these guys on their antics.
 

Redd the Sock

New member
Apr 14, 2010
1,088
0
0
Lightknight said:
Sleekit said:
with only 5% or so of the population being...not straight...and being a self styled "gaming" being a subset of that...and being the kind of self styled "gaming" that would travel to go to a con being a subset of that...

not wanting to be down on anyone but i think the audience for this has gotta be rather on the small side...
It doesn't really matter what size this is. What matters is that the company promised it. So them deciding that the demographic is small would be irrelevant. FYI, 4% of the US population is LGBTQ. Don't know if that matters.

What's funny is that no one said that were with-holding the committed money because they got a case of the gay fears. Merely that they didn't contribute. Somehow, just because this conference was related to LGBT we somehow assumed that that meant the company was gay bashing and that's bullshit to assume when there's no reason that's related at all.

That'd be like saying the utility company shut off power to a gay person's house as if they did it because the person was gay and not because they failed to pay just like the company would do to any other non-paying customer.

Holy yellow journalism Batman (whichever source thought this was newsworthy to begin with). I mean, the money is going to fund a bar that the VIP members had to pay to get into. I wouldn't want to contribute money to that either if my goal was to help members of the LGBT community in some meaningful way.
That wold be Polygon

http://www.polygon.com/2014/7/28/5946619/gaymerx-nis-america-gaymerx2

which had this line

Conn noted that he felt NIS America's actions denote a poor attitude towards queer people. "I feel awful and betrayed," he said.
He apologized quickly afterward admitting the line was said out of anger

http://www.polygon.com/2014/7/30/5951691/nis-america-pay-gaymerx-apology

Gotta love how a funding snafu resulted in free press and more donations.
 

Stryc9

Elite Member
Nov 12, 2008
1,294
0
41
Dragonlayer said:
It is quite hard to keep up with who we're supposed to hate these days for social justice outrages.
No it's not. Everything is offensive to someone so just hate everything and you'll be OK.