Non-Renewable Resource Depletion

Recommended Videos
Mar 30, 2010
3,783
0
0
I_am_a_Spoon said:
Grouchy Imp said:
What angle are you wanting on this shortfall? Has this problem existed for hundreds of years, growing more and more severe with time, or has the invention of X thirty-seven years ago lead to an unanticipated demand for previously worthless Y?
Hmmm... preferably A, but I'm open to B (seems like a bit of a cop-out though).
I agree with you on the A/B preference, at least it'll save you from having to base your plot on something ridiculous called, say, unobtainium. :)

As far as modern world dilemmas go, it's hard to think of ones which aren't either conceivably solvable or terribly mundane. You could possibly go down the whole global-warming route, with rising sea levels wiping out huge tracts of inhabited land causing massive overcrowding, but it's hard to use the GW argument without people instantly playing the 'hippy' card. Maybe increased industrialization in as-now developing countries could pollute global water sources, maybe the increased dependence on renewable energy could lead to heavily contested geothermal hot-spots (although you wanted to avoid fuel, and presumably by extension energy).

But I gotta say fella, I'm pretty much running on empty here. You've picked a toughie, no doubt.
 

Ambi

New member
Oct 9, 2009
862
0
0
http://bit.ly/stockcheck2

According to this data, if fuel production continues to grow at the current rate, I will be about fifty four when the world runs out. Also, unless we have alternative materials or these ones can be recycled (someone look that up to find out, if you like), at the current rate of production growth, we have ten years left of new standard batteries, and thirteen years of new touch screens, computer monitors, solar panels, TV's, and x-ray screens.

Someone please check my interpretation isn't flawed. Do the 'years remaining' columns indicate how many years we have to utilise the resource, including reserves, or does it just indicate how many years we can obtain more of that resource at the current rate?

Either way, it looks like we're running out of all the resources that make our standard of living so high. Think of how scarce resources will be, taking into account population growth too.
 

FrankatronX

New member
Jul 28, 2010
167
0
0
The time will come when we create vehicles capable of running on nothing but human bio mass so I'd say corpses...

for £300 please Bob.