Norton used to be thought of as a terrible anti virus program, that didn't work well and ate up a lot of harddrive and computer performance. However, I've heard some people saying that in recent years, Norton has improved a lot.
Do you think these claims are true, or is Norton still a terrible anti virus piece of software? Are there superior alternatives to Norton? Thanks for any responces.
Do you think these claims are true, or is Norton still a terrible anti virus piece of software? Are there superior alternatives to Norton? Thanks for any responces.