Over the past year, I've read a lot of Warhammer 40k books. Lots. Most of the books authored by Dan Abnett and Sandy Mitchell, anyway.
Generally, I don't read for pleasure much. Not much time, and as I'm finishing my phD in chemistry, I'm spending a lot of time reading and writing technical material. This leads me back to the 40k books; they are fun, but certainly aren't very "thinky." Thank god. As if I want to think when I go home at night.
Perfect.
What I can't shake is this feeling of embarrassment. I'm reading a novelization. Not a novel, a novelization. Taking something that already exists, and fluffing it like a big pillow, and tossing it in a bookstore. I really like these books (so much so that I've considered penning one), but I have seen my share of people who really like their hugglebunny werewolves and vampires too, and no one respects them either.
Sure, read what you want, and damn everyone elses opinions! Fine! I won't stop reading everything abnett and mitchell write. But what I want to know is, where do you draw the line between literature and pulp, and which would you rather read. And, do you ever feel the embarrassment for really liking something that feels kind of lame at an intellectual level?
Generally, I don't read for pleasure much. Not much time, and as I'm finishing my phD in chemistry, I'm spending a lot of time reading and writing technical material. This leads me back to the 40k books; they are fun, but certainly aren't very "thinky." Thank god. As if I want to think when I go home at night.
Perfect.
What I can't shake is this feeling of embarrassment. I'm reading a novelization. Not a novel, a novelization. Taking something that already exists, and fluffing it like a big pillow, and tossing it in a bookstore. I really like these books (so much so that I've considered penning one), but I have seen my share of people who really like their hugglebunny werewolves and vampires too, and no one respects them either.
Sure, read what you want, and damn everyone elses opinions! Fine! I won't stop reading everything abnett and mitchell write. But what I want to know is, where do you draw the line between literature and pulp, and which would you rather read. And, do you ever feel the embarrassment for really liking something that feels kind of lame at an intellectual level?