tbf they do have a get out clause in the fact they never referred to weaopon XI as 'deadpool' and thanks to deadpool's power over the 4th wall they can ret-con stuff away with ease...lordsandro said:Deadpool in the new Wolverine movie. From the initial cast, trough the bad scrip and in the end just fucking up the role. Just plain screwing one of the few cool things Marvel has made.
And yes I am not a big comic fan, Deadpool is kind of exeption from the rule.
(The elevator scene does not count)
Wise craking, gun&katana wealding mercanery who likes the red color...yeah it is totaly Blade.carnkhan4 said:tbf they do have a get out clause in the fact they never referred to weaopon XI as 'deadpool' and thanks to deadpool's power over the 4th wall they can ret-con stuff away with ease...lordsandro said:Deadpool in the new Wolverine movie. From the initial cast, trough the bad scrip and in the end just fucking up the role. Just plain screwing one of the few cool things Marvel has made.
And yes I am not a big comic fan, Deadpool is kind of exeption from the rule.
(The elevator scene does not count)
The blue tiger thing in Antarctica.Phoenix Arrow said:Bubastis was where?NoMoreSanity said:In Watchmen that completly failed to explain why Bubastis was there, one of the only glaring flaws in the transition.
Can't Elrond see into the future?littlerob said:The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers.
Start of Helms Deep. Aragorn come running up all bedraggled and exhausted, to tell Theoden and everyone else that ten thousand Uruk-Hai are behind him and will be at the fortress by nightfall. Then elves arrive just before the uruk-hai and help to fight them.
Hold on a minute. The Rohirrim only found out about the attack a few hours ago. How did the elves manage to hear all about it, assemble an army and march from god-damned Lothlorien to Helms Deep faster than the uruk-hai could cover a few miles?
True, although I thought Benders Big Score done rather well.randommaster said:Any movie with time travel will mess up the mechanics at least once. The number of mistakes is proportional to the time spent explaining how time travel works.
If you mess up the timeline, then the fans will come down from below and slap you for dicking with the timeline so thoroughly. You will simultaneously be ensured of years of work if the series is liked, or the Executives will join in with the slapping if the show sucks.Trivun said:Oh yes, this is true. UK Escapists may be aware of an ITV show called Primeval, involving anomalies - portals through time and space. Well, in the season 3 finale last weekend, Helen Cutter (main villain) tries to eradicate all humanity to prevent an apocalyptic future and save the earth (she has a serious God complex) by travelling through anomalies to the time of the hominids and kill the first ancestors of humanity. She fails, of course, though I won't say exactly what happens because of spoilers. However, no reference is ever made to the paradox that would occur. As a human, she can't kill the hominds because if she does so, she wouldn't exist to kill them, so they wouldn't be dead, so she'd go back and kill them, and you see the circle emerging.randommaster said:Any movie with time travel will mess up the mechanics at least once. The number of mistakes is proportional to the time spent explaining how time travel works.
On a similar note, another character, Connor, finds in the future technology developed by his own research team to control the opening of these anomalies. It's never stated explicitly, but it's hinted that if not for the events of the finale (again, spioilers so no comment on details), then he'd have reverse engineered the technology to invent it in the first place. This makes no sense and creates another paradox, where there's no point of origin for the technology as to create the technology, it must first exist already. Lost is also guilty of this in season 5, with Locke, Richard and the compass...
Well, like I said, the amount of errors that occur is proportional to the amount of exposition given on how time travel works. I haven't seen any of your examples recently, but if I remember correctly, Bill and Ted gave no explanation and didn't use time travel to explain events. This allows them to dick around with time however they want while not having to jump through a bunch of plot holes.achilleas.k said:Well time travel is tricky and you can't really blame them. I mean there are a bunch of ways to handle it. Terminator style, Back to the Future style, Bill and Ted style.randommaster said:Any movie with time travel will mess up the mechanics at least once. The number of mistakes is proportional to the time spent explaining how time travel works.
That being said, I think the only movie I've ever seen that uses time travel and doesn't screw it up in any way is Twelve Monkeys.
But yeah if you want continuity inconsistencies, just aim for time travel for an easy target. I mean, having your actions in the future CAUSE your birth!?
Again though, it all depends on what your view on time travel is, because it can be imagined several ways.
EDIT: Sorry for being off topic.
People really seem to like this post of mine for some reason.sms_117b said:Can't Elrond see into the future?littlerob said:The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers.
Start of Helms Deep. Aragorn come running up all bedraggled and exhausted, to tell Theoden and everyone else that ten thousand Uruk-Hai are behind him and will be at the fortress by nightfall. Then elves arrive just before the uruk-hai and help to fight them.
Hold on a minute. The Rohirrim only found out about the attack a few hours ago. How did the elves manage to hear all about it, assemble an army and march from god-damned Lothlorien to Helms Deep faster than the uruk-hai could cover a few miles?
True, although I thought Benders Big Score done rather well.randommaster said:Any movie with time travel will mess up the mechanics at least once. The number of mistakes is proportional to the time spent explaining how time travel works.
Now you've lost me.NoMoreSanity said:In Watchmen that completly failed to explain why Bubastis was there, one of the only glaring flaws in the transition.
hes agnostic.E.X.D. said:What about the Indianna Jones movies? At the end of Temple Of Doom he believes in magic at the begining of Raiders he doesn't, Temple Of Doom was a prequel.