I actually LOL'd at that...Cheeze_Pavilion said:Jacques must have a PS3 and not a 360.The answer is achievement. You will never achieve in a videogame.
Ironic, to try to draw youths away from the distractions of video games towards the distractions of sports through the much greater distractions of social networking. Fight fire with fire?Malygris said:Rogge has asked each of the 3500 participants in the Youth Games to link personal blogs to MySpace [http://www.facebook.com]and other social networks in order to reach a wide audience of kids.
Match point to the gamersOld dude whos mommy never let him play pong said:Plus, ironically, the Olympics do less to encourage participation than video games
My gamerscore says otherwise.arse said:You will never achieve in a videogame
Second to cricket. And I'm not talking about the guys on the field.sammyfreak said:Badminton is probably the most hardcore sport in the world. Period.Cheeze_Pavilion said:Then again, the Olympics give the same medal to the both the person who wins the badminton competition and the person who wins the decathlon.xMacx said:I took his statement to suggest that Olympic-level physical activities require a level of dedication from atheletes to develop their bodies before acquiring the sport's skill (i.e., you can't be the greatest diver unless you've also maximized the muscles required for diving).
In contrast, games are about acquiring skill with no requirement of physical ability. Not nearly the same thing.
You left out curling.Malygris said:I think the very idea of professional videogaming is laughable and in many ways I share his sentiment about "achieving" in videogames. And I feel precisely the same way about slalom canoeing, archery and individual dressage.