One Country, One Leader?

[Smiles]

I was just wondering if there was maybe a better way, or why this is?

 

[NeedAUserName]

I'm confused... what's this thread asking...

 

[Blind Punk Riot]

Hail, mien fuhrer...


Thats my statement made. I'm more of a socialist. Whos round is it? Who cares, its a communist state!

 

[Good morning blues]

No country has one leader; even dictatorships are dependent on bureaucracies, and democracies are always heavily influenced by their legislatures. I would say that having one single head of government is a good thing, however, because it allows the government to organize their policy around a single agenda without danger of a schism, and because it allows the constituents to hold and individual responsible for any fuckups.

 

[Blind Punk Riot]

The real problem is people, Everything would work fine if people behaved... Roffle at what I just typed!

True that.

 

[OuroborosChoked]

That government is best which governs least. - Thomas Paine

I guess that would be Anarchism, yes?

 

[Amnestic]

Meritocracy [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy], where people are given positions and appointments on the merit of their talents and abilities. If they can do the job the best, they get the job.

^ I like this one the best.

 

[Good morning blues]

Meritocracy [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy], where people are given positions and appointments on the merit of their talents and abilities. If they can do the job the best, they get the job.

^ I like this one the best.

The problem with this is exactly the same as the problem with Communism. Meritocracy is the attempt to take politics out of government.