So I like horror-movies, but I'm not a huge fan of slasher movies. Upon reading this interview with Bill Skarsg?rd, I find myself wondering:
How can brutal mutilation in "Saw" be OK, but a scene that is referred to as "disturbing" cannot be included in what is supposed to be a SCARY movie? The scene in question is said to explain some of the backstory for Pennywise, and how Pennywise came to be. This to me sounds absolutely fantastic to include in the final cut, but ends up being removed because a scene in a scary movie is too scary?
The biggest problem I have with most horror movies is they're either too damn predictable, or they're actually gore-fests, and not really scary; a distinction I wish could be made more often, since slasher and gore-fests usually have a much poorer plot than actual horror movies. I don't mind people dying, it's just that I don't need to see every piece of flesh on their bodies get torn off.
How can brutal mutilation in "Saw" be OK, but a scene that is referred to as "disturbing" cannot be included in what is supposed to be a SCARY movie? The scene in question is said to explain some of the backstory for Pennywise, and how Pennywise came to be. This to me sounds absolutely fantastic to include in the final cut, but ends up being removed because a scene in a scary movie is too scary?
The biggest problem I have with most horror movies is they're either too damn predictable, or they're actually gore-fests, and not really scary; a distinction I wish could be made more often, since slasher and gore-fests usually have a much poorer plot than actual horror movies. I don't mind people dying, it's just that I don't need to see every piece of flesh on their bodies get torn off.