Yopaz said:
Maphysto said:
For the people who are asking what the demographic is, it's people like me who have shitty computers and fuck all chance of getting better ones.
Yopaz said:
punipunipyo said:
what? No user menu? No Model? No cloth map? No art book? No bonus CD/DVD? No sound track CD? No kids-meal toy/model/replica? No DLC content? just a receiving box?
I don't PAY to RENT games, I OWN them, SHOW them, Collect them (dumps all the bad ones though...) paying for Cloud Gaming is like paying for Blockbuster gaming... as if you pay for monthly membership, but the rental store is next to you... but you have to play it over LAN... is it worth it? I say if the connection is solid, HD, and Load time is reduced, and it cost only like $12/mo, it could be nice... but if it's like $60 per, I'd drop it, because I buy about one title per month...
Did you even check out what OnLive is and how it works before you started that rant? You can rent a game for 3 days, a week, a month or buy it and keep it forever for $50. Membership is free, or you can pay for a membership which includes a buttload of games (including Borderlnds, Batman Arkham Asylum and Saints Row 2) for $10 a month.
Well, not exactly, no. See, it's not like Steam, where you completely own a digital copy of the game. You're basically purchasing the rights to play the game for as long as Onlive has the rights to host it. When you buy games on Onlive, the purchase agreement always says something like "this game will be available until at least (date)", which is presumably when they have to decide whether or not to renew the contract.
No, Onlive is not perfect, yes buying the games is better, but it's let me play games I've wanted to play for years, that my comp would burst into flames if I tried to run without it.
Well of course, just as you can only play Xbox games until the disc is too worn out to be usable OnLive isn't completely permanent. Heck, even Steam could fail (chances are low right now though) and make your whole game library there useless. Nothing in life is permanent. Physical things break. Digital things may disappear. What I said could boil down to 2 things.
People should check their facts before making pointless rants.
OnLive offers both rental and purchase service.
First, Yes, I rant about this because I see it as another form of Blockbuster, if i miss understood in ANY way, I am sorry, But keep in mind that I have NEVER used/look in to this service. Thus, from what I read, that was what I thought...
Second, I took it, when I purchase a game, I am voting, voting for what "should be made" and when I don't purchase, I am also voting for "what not to be made again", there are good games out there that you will only play through once, but they focuses on that ONE TIME game play, if you rent it, (payed) you are less likely to purchase for another $50 just to receive a box of a game that you have already finished. thus, you have just voted for "this game sux, I rent" but the fact is that you too enjoyed that game... and now they are not going to make another one like it...
Third, yes, $60 for a game is shitty deal, but who made that happened? if the game companies have all the supports they needed, they'd just be happy to make better games, and let artists rome freely to discovering new ways to create better experiences. However, that isn't true, shit games that uses DRM/Steam(BTW they DO mess up, recently, my bro purchased Dead Island, and the Steam Code were stolen!)/Cut contents for launch day buyers, $15 DLC maps, and Launch day patches... ETC. Hey! I am a buyer! I too were treated like criminal, but I believe, that if I cast my vote, (may not be much) but there will be more of us if we keep encourage each other to support the games we like, and not buy shitty games, we could eventually redirect the market. Rent/Pawn/Used games for good games is hurting the market, that's all I am saying, just flavoring to get more people off that, that's all, didn't know about the buying service... but if every one IS "casting their votes" by buying the good games "after they've tried/rent through a good game", then, I true have nothing to say, but you and I know that this isn't true, They(most people) rent, play, and will not contribute, their vote, simply because "we are too poor", "this game have no replay value"...ETC