Open Discussion: Which Classic Horror Movies Have Aged the Best?

JaredJones

New member
Jun 8, 2015
452
0
0
Open Discussion: Which Classic Horror Movies Have Aged the Best?



Though he may no longer be with us, Wes Craven was able to create characters and stories that will forever stand out as some of the most disturbing of their kind. What other horror films hold such an honor?

You know, I was reading an article about the unfortunate passing of Wes Craven yesterday (not Johnny Depp was turned into a literal fountain of blood [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/142193-Wes-Craven-Dies-at-76]? Perhaps Craven's greatest gift to the horror genre was his ability to craft visceral, gut-wrenching moments that defy both the era they were made in and the technology used to create them.

A horror film is a unique commodity in that way, in that its effectiveness must often hold up to scrutiny some twenty years after it was originally released. Just as action films have relied more on more on CGI-ridden, Michael Bay-splosions to satiate our unquenchable thirst for carnage, horror directors have almost been forced to up the anty to the torture-porny levels of a Saw or a Hostel film to meet our culturally desensitized understanding of what constitutes fear. Of course, there have been some exceptions: Paranormal Activity, The Babadook, and It Follows all stand out as great examples of recent horror films which subvert classic tropes to incredible effect.

So with that in mind, I figured I'd engage you, The Escapist community, in a little discussion: Which Classic Horror Movies Have Aged the Best?

John Carpenter's The Thing immediately comes to mind, with its groundbreaking special effects that have arguably yet to be surpassed in the horror genre, or any genre for that matter. The defibrillator/spider head scene in and of itself is a masterful achievement by any modern standards.


Obviously, it would be downright shameful not to mention Kubrick's The Shining when discussing horror movies with a timeless ability to frighten. The same goes for genre classics like Alien, Poltergeist, Hellraiser, and The Fly.


And even before that, you had visual masterpieces of horror like American Werewolf in London and Jaws, two films so highly regarded that they can still pack any theater having a retro night to this day.


Of course, the timelessness of a horror film is not measured by its special effects alone. To really appreciate fear in its simplest form, you need look no further than the catalogue of a Hitchcock or a Corman. Take the now infamous shower scene from Psycho, for instance.


Even as the technological capabilities of the filmmaking industry have evolved, films like these still find themselves at the top of every "Best of" horror list, and the reasoning is simple: They tap into a part of our psyche that no level of desensitization can erase. Regardless of whatever modern movie monster is marketed as "The next Freddy Krueger", there will never be an actual predecessor to the nightmarish creations of Craven, or Hitchcock, because there will never *be* another Craven or Hitchcock. It's that simple.

This is all a long-winded way of asking: Which horror films do you think have best stood the test of time?



Permalink
 

Silentpony_v1legacy

Alleged Feather-Rustler
Jun 5, 2013
6,760
0
0
Alien, maybe. If only because its sorta futuristic and its hard for the future, however low tech, to look dated. And they don't show the Alien too much, so its easier to not notice its dated qualities.

I mean the original Nightmare on Elms Street is almost as silly as Stephen King's It and the visual effects just look campy, like something out of a 50s B Sci-Fi movie. Part of me views this as closer to Shaun of the Dead rather than Dawn of the Dead, so maybe its not fair to say this horror movie isn't scary when it was never really meant to scare anyone over like...10.

Likewise Helraiser is so over-the-top in its amount of blood. Like wow, I never knew the average man has 30 gallons of bright red blood in his body.

The Thing certainly gets points for atmosphere and buildup, but the monsters just look...off. Like they got drippy and wet down, sure, but you get the feeling the entire set smelled like a new Halloween Mask. You know that chemically clean rubber smell?

Jaws I never found scary so I can't make an argument for or against.

Maybe the Exorcist still stands up? Possibly? I saw it as a mid-teen and yeah it was spooky and gross, but it seemed to freak my parents out way more than me. Maybe its the whole "someone is hurting your child" mentality, which I can't really identify with. Certainly not saying it wasn't scary, but it wasn't the visceral gut-punch that leaves people in comas that I've heard about.

The Shining is good, if only because it barely has anything to do with the original Novel.
 

Fdzzaigl

New member
Mar 31, 2010
822
0
0
Alien... and that's pretty much what I can think of. The Relic, which I watched recently, was also still fairly OK, though not massively scary.
The Thing is very neat, but more in a lulzy kind of way.

I hate the Exorcist being mentioned at the top of every "scariest film ever" list. There wasn't a single moment in that film which scared me. "Oh god, she's puking green goo", I've seen worse in real life.
 

Karloff

New member
Oct 19, 2009
6,474
0
0
Nosferatu (1922), The Cabinet of Dr Caligari (1920), Vampyr (1932). All of these were praised for the nightmarish and dreamlike quality of their visuals, which remains true to this day. You may not be frightened by them, necessarily, but the images will stick with you.

Night of the Living Dead (1968). Romero's breakout film, the first of the modern zombie pictures.

The Haunting (1963), based on the Shirley Jackson novel of the same name.

Hammer Films put out a lot of B movie crap, but it also made The Quatermass Xperiment, Quatermass 2, and Quatermass and the Pit, all of which are film adaptations of the excellent BBC TV originals. Plus there's the many Christopher Lee Dracula films, most of which were rubbish, but hey, Christopher Lee. Worth having a look at for his performance alone. And there are occasional nuggets of gold in the Hammer dross, like The Damned (1963). B movie, but what a hook! Plus there's Oliver Reed chewing the scenery.

Gaslight (1940). Slow build, more of a mystery than a horror, but the last confrontation between husband and wife is riveting.

Most of Val Lewton's back catalogue is worth looking at. The effects can feel a little hokey, but there's something about them that just gets under your skin. I Walked With A Zombie (1943) is like that; not really horrific, but oh, that Carrefour ...
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
piscian said:
Evil Dead 2 or GTFO.
Evil Dead series, I can agree with, but I have to agree with the OP on The Thing. It's never going to stop being good work.
 

Rahkshi500

New member
May 25, 2014
190
0
0
Aliens, The Thing, and The Exorcist, like what others have said and put it into better words than I can.

I'm also gonna say Nightmare of Elm Street, at least for the first and third movie. The rest of the series did got overly goofy and silly to take it rather seriously, but the first and third film I think do hold up. The idea of being haunted and killed by some murderous spirit from within your dreams is a terrifying concept, and it definitely does work greatly within those two films. Freddy's general deposition is a mixed bag, though. While certainly his dark quirks and wit did come as silly or stupid half of the time, the other half though actually added to the horror rather than detract from it. Unlike most classic horror antagonists which tend to silent forces of nature, Freddy has a personality which mixes pure anger and hatred with joyous sadism, and given that as a human he had to keep mostly silent like any other serial killer, as a dream monster he has the freedom to truly express his own demented insanity. The effects aren't top notch, but I think that within the limited budget, they definitely made it work by showing a natural, if sudden transgressions between the real world and a dream world, and thus messes with one's perception and what's real and what isn't.

But if there's another classic film that I can really recall off the top of my head, it's Jacob's Ladder. While a psychological thriller is most cases, it also holds up as a really good horror film as well. When it comes to messing with one's perceptions of reality, this one is a perfect masterpiece of it. While the more visceral stuff is still there and make up some of the most iconic scenes in the film, most of the horror comes from the increasing turmoil of isolation and loneliness as Jacob's world is falling apart around him, with friends and people he can trust growing thinner and thinner while his entire environment is becoming more hostile and deceptive to him. It's a blended mix of dread and sorrow, where you feel scared for him and also sorry for him at the same time.
 

Tsun Tzu

Feuer! Sperrfeuer! Los!
Legacy
Jul 19, 2010
1,620
83
33
Country
Free-Dom
The Thing tops my all time list of movies that fucked up my childhood.

I mean...



...God why.

And then there's the 1988 The Blob remake.




You just can't beat practical effects, man. Just, god damn that's unsettling. And it stays with ya long, long after the first viewing. Ugh.
 

kitsunefather

Verbose and Meandering
Nov 29, 2010
227
0
0
I'd say the following:

Alien, because fucking ALIEN.

Poltergeist, because it still gives my wife nightmares (and that is awesome).

Reanimator, because it is the exact level of tongue-in-cheek needed.

Hellraiser and Hellraiser II, because together they make an excellent story.
 

Fox12

AccursedT- see you space cowboy
Jun 6, 2013
4,828
0
0
I'm surprised no one mentioned Jacobs Ladder. Great use of practical effects, and great performances.

 

suitepee7

I can smell sausage rolls
Dec 6, 2010
1,273
0
0
As for me, I guess I'll parrot others and say Alien and the Thing, but for me the original Halloween is really hard to beat. A good atmosphere really helps horror films remain effective, and those three certainly have it.
 

Gorrath

New member
Feb 22, 2013
1,648
0
0
MarsAtlas said:
I think The Thing actually holds up phenomenally well even despite the things that date it, like the computer or the radio, because its not about the technology, its the setting. Isolated scientific outpost far from civilization with a grave threat to the species as a whole, let alone the measley outpost, throwing it into turmoil? Those settings will continue to exist as long as the infrastructure for scientific research exists, and those threats could continue to exist. We've seen this same story before with various other threats, such as plague, but few as compelling as The Thing's ability of imitiation and assimilation. The paranoia is riveting because of it. If you tried to make a game out of this, the player would go mad trying to keep as many people in their cone of vision and as far away as possible, it would look incredibly irrational, and the only real difference between that setting in a game with NPCs and real life is that in real life one might maybe not act so irrationally as to keep a semblence of civilized behavior at the potential cost of one's life. Its functionally similar to Invasion of the Body Snatchers, but at ground zero. Well, the crappy sequel-prequel from a few years ago that squandered the material was ground zero, but you get what I mean. The story at its core is timeless while the threat is quite unique, utterly alien to our real-world experiences while checking many of the boxes on our "greatest fears" checklist. I'm glad that John Carpenter had people around him supporting his vision when people thought it was too bleak. It was incredibly bleak, yes, but with substance at its core. The groundbreaking and highly imaginative special effects, the great performances, the fantastic score and the all-around good director is just window dressing. As George Lucas once said "special effects without a story is a pretty boring thing", and it holds true here.

To the effect of that quote, I'd like to second the original Night Of The Living Dead. Still a great film even though a lot of the effects come off as really cheesy and bad without being immeresed into the film.
A thousand times this. The Thing is a damned masterpiece of horror from its setting to its visual effects to its plot and premise. That damned spider-legged head walking around if a fucking triumph of scary shit. The claustrophobia of a slasher film, the body horror of the gory sub-genres, the subversion horror of the zombie/virus flick. The Thing has it all, does it well and is both tightly written and beautifully realized. It is easily in the top five best horror films ever made as far as I'm concerned!
 

Gorrath

New member
Feb 22, 2013
1,648
0
0
Fox12 said:
I'm surprised no one mentioned Jacobs Ladder. Great use of practical effects, and great performances.

I love the visual style and psychological horror of Jacob's Ladder. It also has some of the best horror-sex ever put on film that isn't B-grade schlock. Throw in the really unexpected ending and I'm a HUGE fan of it. It holds up quite well since its themes are timeless and its not cheesy.
 

Elementary - Dear Watson

RIP Eleuthera, I will miss you
Nov 9, 2010
2,980
0
0
I hope it counts as horror... although it probably is more 'psychological thriller', but Alfred Hitchcock's 'The Birds' is a film that is very difficult to age too much. The premise is so simple and it doesn't use many effects causing something that is so sinister it can still chill to the bone!
 

Orga777

New member
Jan 2, 2008
197
0
0
Yeah. John Carpenter's The Thing holds up amazingly. That movie is just really creepy. Love it. Other than that, we have Alien, Jaws, Halloween, Psycho, and The Birds. Oh, and surprisingly, the original Haunting. All of them hold up rather well.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,435
4,070
118
MarsAtlas said:
As George Lucas once said "special effects without a story is a pretty boring thing"
Said or proved?

Anyhoo, yeah, The Thing. If you'd call it horror and not sci-fi, The Thing From Another World as well, of which The Thing is said to be a reboot, but I'd argue they were both adaptations of the same story.
 

FPLOON

Your #1 Source for the Dino Porn
Jul 10, 2013
12,531
0
0
In terms of which classics were shown uncut on IFC, they all held up a lot more than I thought... Jaws, The Thing, Nightmare on Elm Street, Scream, Alien, Aliens, Re-Animator, and, for me, the first two Texas Chainsaw Massacre movies... As far as which one aged the best for me, I'm more surprised how much Scream held up when I saw it again this year... No wonder it was spoofed multiple times, even during the last movie and, to an extent, the TV series...

Other than that, now I feel like re-watching the Friday the 13th movies again...