I too like that Steam gives you the option to opt out.JeppeH said:I investigated the whole Origin invading a few weeks back. At this moment Origin does not "read" or view anything Steam doesn't. Origin only checks a few folders. (some guy more clever than me checked it in Sandboxie)
But the EULA says that Origin and EA retains the RIGHT to read all kinds of folders and get all kinds of information of whats installed on your PC.
READ: only whats installed. So those pirated movies it will not tell EA about, but if you have something installed, like a game, application or program; then Origin COULD be used to tell EA. It doesn't at the moment, but the EULA tells you the EA has the intention to do so at some point.
Now Steam CAN do the same thing and indeed Steam asks if it can get more info by prompting you to participate in this info-harvest. The difference being Steam asking and giving me an opportunity to deny. Origin is not asking just stating it keeps the right to harvest without consent.
Fair shot? How about already giving it 6 years? Because Origin is simply a rebranded EA Downloader, which was previously EA Store. If they couldn't learn from years of experience, when will they learn?Andy Chalk said:But how low will it have to go before you're willing to give it a fair shot?
At the moment Steam only accesses info about your system directly related to you gaming = driver-versions and hardware and the like, but not installed programs like Adobe or iTunes. Steam then asks you if you want to submit additional info, like browsers, players and other info, which you can say NO to. The harvest isn't opt-out, its opt-in. The Steam EULA says it will only collect info on your system directly related to gaming.ph0b0s123 said:So from what you are saying Steam, at the moment, is gathering a lot more info than Origin, but with steam I can opt out of it collecting the info. Whereas with Origin I cannot opt out. Then I know which one I pick, the one that gatherings more info, but that I can opt out of, which has net result of least invasion of privacy. That's Steam. Done....JeppeH said:I investigated the whole Origin invading a few weeks back. At this moment Origin does not "read" or view anything Steam doesn't. Origin only checks a few folders. (some guy more clever than me checked it in Sandboxie)008Zulu said:-snip-JeppeH said:-snip-
But the EULA says that Origin and EA retains the RIGHT to read all kinds of folders and get all kinds of information of whats installed on your PC.
READ: only whats installed. So those pirated movies it will not tell EA about, but if you have something installed, like a game, application or program; then Origin COULD be used to tell EA. It doesn't at the moment, but the EULA tells you the EA has the intention to do so at some point.
Now Steam CAN do the same thing and indeed Steam asks if it can get more info by prompting you to participate in this info-harvest. The difference being Steam asking and giving me an opportunity to deny. Origin is not asking just stating it keeps the right to harvest without consent.
And this is exactly why I do not trust EA.Raiyan 1.0 said:Fair shot? How about already giving it 6 years? Because Origin is simply a rebranded EA Downloader, which was previously EA Store. If they couldn't learn from years of experience, when will they learn?Andy Chalk said:But how low will it have to go before you're willing to give it a fair shot?
There's a difference between Steam as DRM (Steamworks) and Steam as a store... when you buy the game elsewhere, elsewhere gets your money. When you buy a Steamworks game on Origin, Origin gets your money. (Well whatever the split happens to be, obviously not all of it goes to the retailer but hey just roll with it.) Point being, exclusivity of storefront is the issue here, NOT exclusivity of DRM system. If companies want to use Steamworks for their digital rights management, achievements, update streamlining and matchmaking, then power to them. It does not make it "exclusive" to the system any more than if they used Stardock or Games for Windows LIVE.Frostbite3789 said:Alright, I just saw this part of your post and it gave me a headache. Valve games are exclusive to Steam...even if you get a physical copy you have to install Steam. Much like getting a physical copy of BF3 requires Origin.intheweeds said:If Valve games were exclusive to Steam, we could talk competition, but Steam is just a store that sells games, whereas Origin is a required platform for all future EA games disguised as a store so they can hopefully get a little more of your money while you are there.
Valve games have required you to install Steam since 2004. So somehow you've missed this for nearly 8 years. Even some non-Steam games are starting to require Steam, such as DoWII: Retribution. Dead Island. Space Marine.
That still makes Steam the exclusive digital distribution platform for games like Half Life 2, Portal, Portal 2 and the ilk.Andy of Comix Inc said:Snip
Battlefield 3 doesn't use Origin in-game.Frostbite3789 said:That still makes Steam the exclusive digital distribution platform for games like Half Life 2, Portal, Portal 2 and the ilk.Andy of Comix Inc said:Snip
Which is no different than Origin being the exclusive digital distribution platform of Battlefield 3, ME3 and TOR.
I mean, Amazon actually has Battlefield 3 as a digital download. It doesn't however have Portal 2. Which came out recently enough for it to be included in Amazon's digital downloads. You can check for yourself, I already closed the tabs and don't care enough to open it again to copy and paste the links.
I think you and are I on the same wavelength, guy.Andy of Comix Inc said:Battlefield 3 doesn't use Origin in-game.Frostbite3789 said:That still makes Steam the exclusive digital distribution platform for games like Half Life 2, Portal, Portal 2 and the ilk.Andy of Comix Inc said:Snip
Which is no different than Origin being the exclusive digital distribution platform of Battlefield 3, ME3 and TOR.
I mean, Amazon actually has Battlefield 3 as a digital download. It doesn't however have Portal 2. Which came out recently enough for it to be included in Amazon's digital downloads. You can check for yourself, I already closed the tabs and don't care enough to open it again to copy and paste the links.
But digital distribution is only an issue once the product gets to your computer. Until then, the distributor is whoever you're buying it from. You download the game from the Steam client, but you don't buy the game from it. You can, but you really don't have to. I can buy Portal 2 in a retail store, and until it reaches my PC the "distributor" was the game store I bought it from.
That's not a monopoly. It's like saying your DVD player has a monopoly over your DVDs. You're running the movie off of the DVD player, but no money passed through the DVD player. There are games that are exclusive to Steam, usually indie titles, but even then, GamersGate usually has it covered too.
The thing that gets me about Origin vs Steam, is that Steam offers genuine customer improvement and support. I've said this elsewhere too many times to count, but if I must be tied to a system, it's nice that the system offers me free content for my games, organizes my games, gives me achievements and Cloud saves, a robust IRC client, and direct online server creation. Steam's feature list is huge and ever-growing beyond being a digital storefront and DRM client. What does Origin have that even compares to those features? Nothing. There's no compensation, no extra content, just a bunch of games laid out and tied to a DRM client.Frostbite3789 said:I think you and are I on the same wavelength, guy.
The original guy was complaining about Origin being the only digital distributor of Battlefield 3, ME3 and TOR. With Battlefield 3 it's a straight up untruth as evidenced by Amazon. But he uses Steam, which uses the same tactics for digital distribution. I don't mind it, at all. It gets people to use your service.
The other guy already informed you that Origin has Cloud and a (better) chat system with a friends list and all that.Andy of Comix Inc said:The thing that gets me about Origin vs Steam, is that Steam offers genuine customer improvement and support. I've said this elsewhere too many times to count, but if I must be tied to a system, it's nice that the system offers me free content for my games, organizes my games, gives me achievements and Cloud saves, a robust IRC client, and direct online server creation. Steam's feature list is huge and ever-growing beyond being a digital storefront and DRM client. What does Origin have that even compares to those features? Nothing. There's no compensation, no extra content, just a bunch of games laid out and tied to a DRM client.Frostbite3789 said:I think you and are I on the same wavelength, guy.
The original guy was complaining about Origin being the only digital distributor of Battlefield 3, ME3 and TOR. With Battlefield 3 it's a straight up untruth as evidenced by Amazon. But he uses Steam, which uses the same tactics for digital distribution. I don't mind it, at all. It gets people to use your service.
And that's the story of how I became a fanboy >_>