I got out an hour before that happened, I half wish I was around to see it first hand.zen5887 said:This is really good to see.
I am lucky enough to be out of the danger zone, but I have a lot of friends and family who were affected.
I got out an hour before that happened, I half wish I was around to see it first hand.zen5887 said:This is really good to see.
I am lucky enough to be out of the danger zone, but I have a lot of friends and family who were affected.
it came because it built up in mountain areas as we had 1 week of solid rain, a 8 meter tall wall of water then hit toowoomba and its neibouring suburbs some towns not getting any warning at all (which people now call the inland tsunami), i know one towns has been completly destroyed not a single house remains, that water then went into the brisbane river which snakes its way through brisbane so it just flooded everything tearing free boats, moarings, jettys and 300 meters of the river side walk (the 300 meters was in one large lump when it tore free), the flood also shut down all of brisbane and its nearby suburbs sewage plants so all the sewage in the area is just being pumped into the river (so its not just mud covering everything) to add insult to injury the main water dam was sitting at 90% full before the raining started and during the floods went up to 190% so they have had to empty an amount of water which would have sustained brisbane for five years in 3 days.Roofstone said:I wonder; Where did all the water come from? Suddenly I woke up, and about half of Australia was halfway to joining the atlantis neighbourhood..
Although WA did have bushfires, there was also flooding in Carnarvon around Christmas time.khiliani said:we are having quite bad weather at the moment down here. i think the only state without some form of flooding is WA, and they just had a bush fire.
stinkychops said:I imagine its because the vast amount of people either don't know what to say or because they feel it would be inappropriate to talk.Trogdor1138 said:I was surprised to see actual replies in this thread, I remember checking on the day and not seeing anything thinking to myself "Wow, thanks everybody, it's great you all care so much about real issues".
Oh well, that's okay now I guess... I'm still slightly disturbed by the fact completely fluff random articles get more attention, but hey.
Any notice Mr Brown suggesting the coal industry should pay for the damages?
Well, to be fair Australia had floods exactly like these in '78 or '73 ... forgotten <.< 30 years ago thereabouts.Zenode said:And yet HOW much international aid are we getting compared to what we give everyone else?
Its silly, there was only 1 comment on this about a big natural disaster yet a story about a woman throwing a Wii at someone has 40ish, i know it not many but a woman injuring her husband should not get better coverage than a national disaster
I vote for the 'giant hammer of continent shattering' approach. But really, I like that we are so big, I'm pretty sure it is our enormous land-mass that lets us have backyards and stuff all over the place. Also, if we were smaller, where would we keep all our dangerous animals because I don't have the money to support them financially for any extended duration (or the life expectancy, because if I did that they'd probably bite/maul/strangle/poison me within a day).SL33TBL1ND said:Yeah, our country is pretty damn big. Should prolly fix that someday.
exactly! to any Aussies who are annoyed that we pay hundreds of millions of dollars a year in aid to other countries, and "why aren't they returning the favor now!?"EmeraldGreen said:Haiti is a third-world country. It needs all the help it can get. (Even now. A year later, there are still huge problems in Haiti. Check out the articles on the UNICEF website [http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/haiti_newsline.html].)viranimus said:You know... this really makes me mad. Roughly this time last year we heard absolutely nothing but Haiti on the US news for weeks and how we should do all we could to help those people in their time of need. A people who have historically not wanted and out and out refused US presence.
Yet we have a country who is having a similar level of disaster, who have long been friends to the US and we have basically heard nothing about it from our mainstream news outlets.
Australia, on the other hand, is very well off. We need some help at the moment, and rebuilding everything we've lost will take a long time. But I'm sure we won't have Queenslanders still living in tent cities this time next year.
And the death toll is not comparable. Estimates of the Haitian death toll range between 92,000 and 316,000 (numbers from Wikipedia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Haiti_earthquake], if you're wondering). The Australian floods? According to the ABC [http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/01/15/3113643.htm], 16 confirmed dead and 28 currently missing.
Please don't think I'm making light of the pain of those who have lost homes, livelihoods, friends and loved ones in the floods. But in terms of needing aid - I don't think the Australian floods are in the same league as the Haitian earthquake.
Danish rage said:Yeah, and that everyone went completely apeshit as soon as he'd said that. Especially Barnaby Joyce, calling it a 'rallying cry for the greens'stinkychops said:I imagine its because the vast amount of people either don't know what to say or because they feel it would be inappropriate to talk.Trogdor1138 said:I was surprised to see actual replies in this thread, I remember checking on the day and not seeing anything thinking to myself "Wow, thanks everybody, it's great you all care so much about real issues".
Oh well, that's okay now I guess... I'm still slightly disturbed by the fact completely fluff random articles get more attention, but hey.
Any notice Mr Brown suggesting the coal industry should pay for the damages?
OT: I'm in Victoria, and I'm incredibly glad that the flooding hasn't reached Melbourne yet.
Hang on Queensland, it'll pass eventually.