Yeah ... a lot of this garbage just means we kind of send money elsewhere rather than domestic retailers. It hurts businesses, does little to restrict consumption ...Czann said:Nanny state can't deal with it. Seriously? These idiots want to regulate what adults can and can't see? What what is this crap to 'refuse to classify'? These morons are paid with tax money so are they refusing to do their job?
Ignore them and just import it. Probably cheaper by the way.
Wait I thought the usual suspects were the other guys? Or the other, other guys? Do the usual suspects even exist?LostGryphon said:Hi.Avnger said:And now this is censorship. Funny how the usual suspects aren't as up in arms as when a studio cuts 3 frames of underage panty shots from a game.
Fairly usual suspect, circa 2014-2015.
And, yes, this is bullshit. The same as it's been every time the land down under pulls this sort of thing...and, yet, the population keeps voting these people into office.
What do you want us to do about it though, aside from ***** like we do everywhere else?
Aussies are used to this by now, I'd think.
Get some outside keys or procure the game some other way. Circumvent the nannystate wherever you can, basically.
And yet I can still buy F.E.A.R.2, which ends with the player characterZendariel said:There was an excerpt from the review board on the kotaku article that was linked in the article. According to it it is just barely not shown. Part of the the excerpt in the spoiler tags.Spade Lead said:That is what bothers them? It is implied that there is sexual violence, but none is actually shown? So, when are they going to ban the internet since rape fetish porn and rape fetish novels and short stories are a thing?implied sexual violence
There is some sort of ritual orgy taking place, where a female(?) creature probably rapes the main character.
"As Blake yells for the creatures to "Get away from her!" a female creature, her greyish breasts bared, pushes him onto his back, holds his arms to the ground and repeatedly thrusts her crotch against him. As Blake protests, saying "No! Stop that!" the creature thrusts again, before placing its face over his midsection and then sitting up and wiping its mouth.
Although much of the contact between the creature and Blake is obscurred, by it taking place below screen, the sexualised surroundings and aggressive behaviour of the creature suggest that it is an assault which is sexual in nature. The Board is of the opinion that this, combined with Blake's objections and distress, constitutes a depiction of implied sexual violence."
Almost missed this line because it was not on the spoiler warning area.
"The board's decision, which have been provided to Kotaku Australia, was based on multiple scenes where - even though it is implied that the main character, Blake, is hallucinating - sexual violence is implied."
Not really surprised about the decision since Australia seems to have banned games from much less.
Also if i'm not completely mistaken, Australia has tried to restrict internet in the past.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_Australia