I am generally very leery of saying Batman is good because it FEELS like Batman because, for better of for worse, Batman 1989 shaped the public perception of Batman by being the big mainstream iteration and by being followed by Batman:The Animated Series. It was notably different from, say, the Adam West Batman and is chockfull of imagery and sounds more evocative of Burton and Elfman that I would say a Batman that came before(although this is coming from someone born in 1994, so I can hardly be an authority of on pre1989 Batman).Samtemdo8 said:But at least Batman 1989 FELT like a Batman movie than the Nolan Trilogy because having recently watched the Dark Knight, they feel unrecognizable as a proper DC Comics movie so fuck it, screw my rule in the OP.
The Dark Knight is now the most overrated movie ever. And its all entirely on this near god-like veneration of Heath Ledger's Joker.
Its like these people has never seen Acting before and yet the praise of Ledger's Joker performance feels like it overshadows all others.
What ever happened to Malcolm MacDowall? What happened to Marlon Brando, Al Pacino, Robert De Niro, What happened to Tom Hanks?
The Dark Knight, to my mind, simply is the best Batman movie I've seen, with the firmest grasp on maintaining likeable characters, a compelling villain matched with an evocative soundtrack and stellar cinematography, and I can't help but feel chalking all praise of the film as just being about Ledger is a bit of a disservice to everything else it does right, and to the talents of the rest of the crew.