Oversized Black Hole Confounds Scientists

Encaen

New member
May 6, 2005
999
0
0
Oversized Black Hole Confounds Scientists


Phenomenal cosmic power! Itty bitty living space.

Black holes, the cosmic objects with gravity so strong that not even light can escape, are believed to be at the center of most large galaxies. Likewise, the size of a black hole was thought to be proportional in some capacity to the size of its host galaxy. Until now, that is. A recent observation of galaxy NGC 1277, some 220 million light years away, has shaken up this belief by hosting a super massive black hole in a relatively tiny galaxy. Our own Milky Way galaxy is four times larger than NGC 1277, but the black hole at our distant neighbor's center is some 4,000 times larger than our own central black hole, and approximately 17 billion times the mass of our Sun. Ponder that one for a moment.

Given that their intense gravity doesn't allow light to escape, it is profoundly difficult to actually observe a black hole, so we are forced to derive information about them by measuring their influence on nearby stars. Scientists hunting for the universe's largest black hole found NGC 1277 and estimated that its central black hole was roughly the size of our entire solar system, and made up some 14% of the mass of the entire galaxy.

Until now, the prevailing thought was that such large black holes could only exist in larger galaxies, due to the theory of how they evolve in tandem with their host galaxy. Since black holes were thought to grow primarily by absorbing matter from their surroundings, it made sense that you would need a fairly high-mass galaxy to grow a super massive black hole. It is currently unclear how, exactly, a black hole this size formed within such a small galaxy, but scientists are already no doubt hard at work coming up with a viable explanation. "This galaxy seems to be very old," Dr. Van den Bosch told BBC, "So somehow this black hole grew very quickly a long time ago, but since then that galaxy has been sitting there not forming any new stars or anything else."

Source: BBC [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20528137]
Image: NASA [http://www.nasa.gov/]


Permalink
 

5ilver

New member
Aug 25, 2010
341
0
0
Mandatory song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBb-J0hcBQA

On-thread, I wonder how long it'll be before we make our own black holes in labs and use them as an energy source.
Fusion reactors are so 10 years ago ^^
 

kouriichi

New member
Sep 5, 2010
2,415
0
0
Nothing amazing here folks! My stomach turns into the same thing after a 50 pack of White Castle.

But things like this really do astound me. The amount of power of a black hole is just.... Unfathomable to my tiny meat brain.
 

portal_cat

New member
Jun 25, 2009
62
0
0
"There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened."
~Douglas Adams
 

RA92

New member
Jan 1, 2011
3,079
0
0
kouriichi said:
But things like this really do astound me. The amount of power of a black hole is just.... Unfathomable to my tiny meat brain.
Yeah, sometimes the gravity of their implications are just beyond our grasps.
 

RejjeN

New member
Aug 12, 2009
369
0
0
Maybe it ate the rest of it's galaxy? o_O (Could imply that Black Holes eventually eat their galaxy, maybe they even grow so large they begin to interact and eventually it's just one galaxy-spanning black hole or BOOM, universe reset. It's a theory at least :p)
 

Skeleon

New member
Nov 2, 2007
5,410
0
0
RejjeN said:
Maybe it ate the rest of it's galaxy? o_O (Could imply that Black Holes eventually eat their galaxy, maybe they even grow so large they begin to interact and eventually it's just one galaxy-spanning black hole or BOOM, universe reset. It's a theory at least :p)
Yeah, I was wondering about that, too. I guess the outer-most stars would be at a stable orbit, but couldn't everything else eventually be absorbed by it? And if that galaxy is so old... mind, I'm no astronomer.
 

thiosk

New member
Sep 18, 2008
5,410
0
0
This article fails to note whether the galaxy is spiral, elliptical, or irregular, and important note to determine the approximate age of the galaxy. If it was irregular, I'd guess a trick of gravity robbed the host of most of its stars after a run in with a couple other galaxies, or perhaps the interactions between a couple black holes were strong enough that most of the stars were kicked off when galaxies came together and the black holes merged.

RejjeN said:
Maybe it ate the rest of it's galaxy? o_O (Could imply that Black Holes eventually eat their galaxy, maybe they even grow so large they begin to interact and eventually it's just one galaxy-spanning black hole or BOOM, universe reset. It's a theory at least :p)
Not something i'm worried about. where we are in our galaxy, we do not feel any real gravitational influence from the black hole at the galactic center-- we feel the influence from all the stuff between us and the center.
 

Souplex

Souplex Killsplosion Awesomegasm
Jul 29, 2008
10,312
0
0
My guess is that galaxy used to be much larger, but the black hole has since absorbed most of it, adding its mass to its own.
 

Ian Mantell

New member
Mar 2, 2012
10
0
0
I wondered if maybe black holes are interconnections. So it reaches into different spacetime continua simultaneously and someplace else it had lots of stars served as fast food to it. Not necessarily in the same brane.
 

F'Angus

New member
Nov 18, 2009
1,102
0
0
17 Billion Times the mass of our Sun... That is just something I can't comprehend.
 

Pyrian

Hat Man
Legacy
Jul 8, 2011
1,399
8
13
San Diego, CA
Country
US
Gender
Male
DVS BSTrD said:
You know there might be a correlation there Doc. Perhaps maybe even a causation?
Well, yeah, it's pretty common that a sufficiently large black hole apparently starts preventing star formation. The theory goes that once the jets from matter falling into the black hole are hot enough, the gas in the surrounding galaxy gets too hot to form new stars.

Doesn't do squat to explain how it got there in the first place.
 

Guffe

New member
Jul 12, 2009
5,106
0
0
Yo mamas' so fat, she won't fit into the new big black hole!

I have nothing to comment here, to time to go exploring!
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
Seems to me the logical answer (or at least theory) would be that the galaxy in question - being very old as stated in the quote from the article - could have been very densely packed and that the black hole has already had enough time to devour a good portion of it, allowing it to grow to such a massive state.
 

cerebus23

New member
May 16, 2010
1,275
0
0
RJ 17 said:
Seems to me the logical answer (or at least theory) would be that the galaxy in question - being very old as stated in the quote from the article - could have been very densely packed and that the black hole has already had enough time to devour a good portion of it, allowing it to grow to such a massive state.

yea i do not see any grand mystery here, obviously his thing fed and fed well at some point and time, probably long long before any humans were around to see any light from it. Cosmic collisions and etc probably led to this thing getting so massive and swallowing other black holes.
 

Redingold

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Mar 28, 2009
1,641
0
0
It's highly unlikely that the black hole simply absorbed the rest of the stars in the galaxy. It's no more difficult to get into a stable orbit around a black hole than it is to get into orbit around any object, and it doesn't matter whether the mass of a galaxy is concentrated at the centre or more spread out, because to an object outside that spread, the two behave identically from a gravitational perspective, so long as the spread is even.

As for collisions with another galaxy, when galaxies collide, the chance of stars and black holes actually hitting each other is really really small. You might think this black hole is big, but it's only 0.005 lightyears across, which is minuscule compared to the separation between stars.

If the answer was this simple, do you think the astrophysicists would have a problem with it? These guys aren't idiots, if there were a simple answer, they'd have spotted it.
 

RicoADF

Welcome back Commander
Jun 2, 2009
3,147
0
0
Souplex said:
My guess is that galaxy used to be much larger, but the black hole has since absorbed most of it, adding its mass to its own.
That's what I was thinking, the black hole was a pig and ate all its neighbours, leaving it forever alone.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
Black hole expanded with mass it sucked. evnetually in the end of its life black hole eats whole galaxy. what we see here, is a big black hole that has ate half of the galaxy, maknig the remaining part look proportionately small. it is likely that "soon" the black hole will finish eating whole galaxy and if it has enough mass, explode and create new stars, if not, then its going to attempt to such neighboars.
what is worrying, is that explosion is very likely to hit our galaxy as well, and thats not nice believe me.

P.S. "Soon" in space terms means millions of years.

It's highly unlikely that the black hole simply absorbed the rest of the stars in the galaxy. It's no more difficult to get into a stable orbit around a black hole than it is to get into orbit around any object,
excelt that once a passing asteroid or whatever destabilizes your orbit, isntead of just drifting you get down into the black hole, and on your way destabilize other orbits that you drag with you. space is never static. sure its static for the period of our lifetimes, but were speaking billions of years here.

Then agian gravity in space just doesnt really work the way we expect. while our laws of physics are fine for our every day lives, when it comes to extremely small or extremely large mass, we start noticing that they dont really work this way. thati s not to say we must ignore them. their not perfect but thier the best we got.