In the original letter they say it's lenticular.thiosk said:This article fails to note whether the galaxy is spiral, elliptical, or irregular, and important note to determine the approximate age of the galaxy. If it was irregular, I'd guess a trick of gravity robbed the host of most of its stars after a run in with a couple other galaxies, or perhaps the interactions between a couple black holes were strong enough that most of the stars were kicked off when galaxies came together and the black holes merged.
Not something i'm worried about. where we are in our galaxy, we do not feel any real gravitational influence from the black hole at the galactic center-- we feel the influence from all the stuff between us and the center.RejjeN said:Maybe it ate the rest of it's galaxy? (Could imply that Black Holes eventually eat their galaxy, maybe they even grow so large they begin to interact and eventually it's just one galaxy-spanning black hole or BOOM, universe reset. It's a theory at least )
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v491/n7426/full/nature11592.html
Speaking of which, could you you please include a reference to the original report in future scientific posts?
I get that most people probably aren't interested in them, but it would be nice to be able to go directly to it.