I've never had this problem myself, but those of you that have can rest assured that you've got my deepest sympathies.
Nope, they have the dictionary check also do common letter/number substitution. Also, it happens to catch some words you decided to break with a symbol (some, not all, say, it might catch "passwo1rd" as being "password").evilneko said:Not even in l33t?
Yep, that's the funny thing - it just means that anybody trying to guess a password now has a really reduced search space to go through. Though, with that said, the search space would be skewed to unorthodox passwords but it's still not really more secure than having a lighter security (making sure it's not your pet name or something) and making sure to stop bruteforce attacks.In Search of Username said:I never understood this. Surely these kind of rules just narrow down the possible passwords that there could be for hackers, and make it difficult for users to remember their passwords because they're never what they want them to be.
OK, here we'll disagree - an university account is a really high profile thing to get a hold of. It does give access to a lot of resources and information that should be constrained to one person, also it gives access to that person's details. Not to mention emails - that alone is worth the protection.In Search of Username said:Also even if it did help security, who's gonna hack your university account and do your homework for you? ugh
What irritates me more then ridiculous requirements is when they have you change your password every 6 months or so and then don't let you use any of your old passwords so you have to keep thinking up new ones that youll remember T_TDa Orky Man said:I'm sure we've all encountered them. You turn up at a new job, or go to university, or even just sign up to a random forum, and when you get to the password part of the 'create account form' they have a list longer than War and Peace of requirements that your password must oblige by.
Currently, I'm trying to create my email account at the university I shall be attending in a month or so. The password requirements must:
- be between 8 and 14 characters long
- contain at least 5 unique characters
- contain at least one letter
- contain at least one number
- be nothing like a real word in any language
Note that it will also turn down any password that contains and word in any real language, so if you chose 'itbtwtw2' as a password, it turns it down as it contains the word 'it' at the beginning.
SO then, what insanely overzealous password systems have you dealt with?
PS: Just in case anyone else is going there, the university is Aberystwyth. Just thought I'd mention it.
EDIT: Fucking hell, now it's turning down passwords because they are 'Based on an already used password'. This is not easy.
I'm reading a book with a character who came from there. Just an odd little bit of happenstance to see the same Welsh name come up twice in close proximity, especially since the book and I are both American.Da Orky Man said:PS: Just in case anyone else is going there, the university is Aberystwyth. Just thought I'd mention it.
My current password for MSN and the like is completely and utterly insane because they won't let me use past passwords and have required me to do a password resent just about 9 million times.Kalezian said:While it isn't a password per say, the Xbox Live Security Proof's are beyond annoying as hell.
Essentially, about once a week, you are asked to put in a password that Microsoft will send you through the email.
Now, this is all fine and everything, except for the few of us that used an Email back in 2007 or so and forgot the password in the six years of never using it.
Of course, you can just hit back if you dont want to put in the proof, but skip it too many times and you lose your account.
Including everything you have ever bought and downloaded.
One of my friends went through that and it annoys him still that he lost his account because of overzealous account protection.
Oh, but you can change what email address that password gets sent to, but you have to wait 30 days for it to activate.
really annoying when all you want to do is jump online and play a few maps of Battlefield 3, and then have to do a loop between your 360 and pc.
Wrong as in just flat out wrong/misinformed? Or wrong as in their numbers are slightly off?evilneko said:Sadly, that xkcd comic... is wrong.![]()
Wrong/misinformed.ThingWhatSqueaks said:Wrong as in just flat out wrong/misinformed? Or wrong as in their numbers are slightly off?evilneko said:Sadly, that xkcd comic... is wrong.![]()
Never run into one that says it can't be a real word, but there are obvious reasons why they tell you to make them complex. brute force hacking is very easy if you don't make things complicated.Da Orky Man said:- be between 8 and 14 characters long
- contain at least 5 unique characters
- contain at least one letter
- contain at least one number
Dictionary attacks use word lists, correct. They do not, however, use multiple words and here's why:TechNoFear said:Wrong/misinformed.
It assumes a particular attack method; brute force using all possible characters (valid ASCII values).
In practice most attacks use a number of methods, first trying to find 'simple' passwords, before resorting to brute force.
These methods (for simple passwords) include 'dictionary' attacks, which is to try a list of words and common passwords (12345 is the most common).
This means that the password in the second example would be found with methods used much earlier in the attack (than the method required to find the password in the first example).
Mine has all of these, PLUSDa Orky Man said:Currently, I'm trying to create my email account at the university I shall be attending in a month or so. The password requirements must:
- be between 8 and 14 characters long
- contain at least 5 unique characters
- contain at least one letter
- contain at least one number
- be nothing like a real word in any language
Okay, this always scares me when I see it. Why would they limit a password to X characters? If they're properly hashing and securing the password before storing it then limiting length doesn't serve any purpose, right? The only reason I can see why they would put a size limit on passwords is if they're storing them in plain text, and have a size limit on the 'password' column in their database. Unless there's some other reason why some sites limit their password lengths to ridiculously short ones like 12 or 16 characters?Da Orky Man said:- be between 8 and 14 characters long
You're assuming an extremely low guess rate and a very basic style of attack. In reality the guess rate would be at least 6-7 orders of magnitude higher, the wordlist would be optimized and the attack more intelligent.Uncle Nick said:Dictionary attacks use word lists, correct. They do not, however, use multiple words and here's why:TechNoFear said:Wrong/misinformed.
It assumes a particular attack method; brute force using all possible characters (valid ASCII values).
In practice most attacks use a number of methods, first trying to find 'simple' passwords, before resorting to brute force.
These methods (for simple passwords) include 'dictionary' attacks, which is to try a list of words and common passwords (12345 is the most common).
This means that the password in the second example would be found with methods used much earlier in the attack (than the method required to find the password in the first example).
As the OED is cited as containing 171,476 words, a dictionary attack using this list would take a maximum of 171,476 guesses. A two word phrase, using words taken from this list would take a maximum of 171,476^2 guesses. Hmm, that's a lot more.
The CHBS password (indeed, any four word passphrase) would take a maximum of 171,476^4 guesses. 8.645963084×10²⁰, my calculator tells me. Which at the same 1,000 guesses per second rate would take 27,416,169,089 years to exhaust the search space. So the brute force attack would actually by faster than the dictionary attack.
Length limits have multiple causes, from poor application design to stupid decisions on the part of management. It's also pretty common for passwords to be stored as plain, unsalted MD5 hashes, which might as well be plain text with today's cracking capabilities. Your password's essentially only as good as the method used to store it.ArcaneSaint said:Okay, this always scares me when I see it. Why would they limit a password to X characters? If they're properly hashing and securing the password before storing it then limiting length doesn't serve any purpose, right? The only reason I can see why they would put a size limit on passwords is if they're storing them in plain text, and have a size limit on the 'password' column in their database. Unless there's some other reason why some sites limit their password lengths to ridiculously short ones like 12 or 16 characters?Da Orky Man said:- be between 8 and 14 characters long