Because both cost money.Jonny49 said:Why not play both?
And I don't have money...
Because both cost money.Jonny49 said:Why not play both?
Because games are expensive. We can't all afford to just buy every decent looking game being released.Jonny49 said:Why not play both?
Although I do agree with him, I will give up online gaming if individual games start demanding subscriptions.Gizmo007666 said:Would I be right in saying that this is the same Michael Pachter who claimed a while back games like CoD would need to move to subscription based in order to make decent return on the time spent being played?
Just checked and yup
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/102117-Pachter-Publishers-Need-to-Charge-for-Online-Play
Some fantastic work by this analyst, he has given his opinion on the matter and then a few months down the line said that it will cause players to jump ship.
Seriously if this is his day job can I apply for a similar post, since it seems to involve making observations on the obvious actions of the market.
Be prepared to get gameraped by every publisher if Elite does succeed.BrotherRool said:I don't think this will happen. I think we will hate it, but Elite will succeed.
It'll be hard to tell, because he's only talking about a small number of hardcore players, and a lot of less hardcore players probably just buy both games
The MW3 gameplay was, I'm forced to admit, pretty exciting if not still treading old grounds. The BF3 stuff shown, from the lighting to character "animation", was especially impressive...tehroc said:BF3 looks fantastic while MW3 trailer looks like yesterday's graphic technologies (Notwithstanding being almost a scene for scene copy of Crysis 2's intro).
I was thinking that but I wasn't sure, brilliant find good sir/madam. I'm now giggling with glee. This guy is a tool.Gizmo007666 said:Would I be right in saying that this is the same Michael Pachter who claimed a while back games like CoD would need to move to subscription based in order to make decent return on the time spent being played?
Just checked and yup
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/102117-Pachter-Publishers-Need-to-Charge-for-Online-Play
Some fantastic work by this analyst, he has given his opinion on the matter and then a few months down the line said that it will cause players to jump ship.
Seriously if this is his day job can I apply for a similar post, since it seems to involve making observations on the obvious actions of the market.
You can't because you must sign a contract giving either companies your soul, signed in your own blood in triplicate.Jonny49 said:Why not play both?
EDIT: As in, why not try both games, and see which one you prefer instead of basing what you buy on outside services.
If that really causes people to defect to CoD, I will throw up from how disgusted I am with gamers. That's just plain sad.bob1052 said:And removing Battlefield from Steam is going to have players defect to CoD. Considering the PC audience is the only sizable audience Battlefield has control of right now that is definitely going to make a bigger difference.