Pachter Predicts PlayStation Domination

Saltyk

Sane among the insane.
Sep 12, 2010
16,755
0
0
I know everyone hates this guy here, but I gotta be honest.
"If you are a Nintendo fan bitching about my opinion on Wii U, stop, put your money where your mouth is and buy a Wii U."
That line made me laugh.

Anyway, I'm not certain about the overall sales. I don't think either console will hit 100 million, though I think both would love to compete with the PS2 for best selling console ever. And honestly, I really don't think Xbox One will be even close to PS4 in global sales. Maybe in US sales.
 

Aiddon_v1legacy

New member
Nov 19, 2009
3,672
0
0
so, looks like Sony is boned then. Pachter's problem is that he's essentially a curse to people. His predictions tend to turn out wrong due to the exact opposite happening.

Tiamat666 said:
*cough*sensationalist*cough*headline

the PS4 will move 100-120 million units over its lifetime, while the Xbox One will manage 90-110 million
Selling 10% more units, possibly even 10% less, can hardly be referred to as "domination".
Yeah, especially since those numbers don't reach the PS2's. I can't help but feel this gen isn't going to expand, but instead contract. And that's not good.
 

Arawn

New member
Dec 18, 2003
515
0
0
el_kabong said:
I think it's funny that people often point to a future rise of PC gaming putting an end to console wars. You know what happens when PC gaming rises? More debate about which OS is best. It will swap one war for another, because people have a slavish need to defend their personal choices and force their opinions on strangers that truly have no affect on their lives.
Well said. No matter what people like to be on the winning team. There needs to be a winner,and there needs to be a loser for the winner to laugh at. It's just the way things are. If not consoles we would be bragging about graphic cards and chips, and RAM. Which we pretty much are. None the less, I'd give Sony the edge since they're hitting more markets, but you could say that MS has the focus on their limited markets as well. Failure is possible on both fronts, yet success is just as that much higher. The time is upon us.....
 

Adam Jensen_v1legacy

I never asked for this
Sep 8, 2011
6,651
0
0
medv4380 said:
Adam Jensen said:
TiberiusEsuriens said:
He's got a point
He reads gaming forums and and then spouts whatever the popular opinion is.
First real analysis do that. It's no different than the twitter analysis that's used to estimate movie attendance the day of the opening, and it's no different than looking at the edits on wikipedia to estimate who's going to win an election. There is flaws in any analysis, but that doesn't make it not an analysis.
But he doesn't actually analyze anything. He just says "oh, this is the popular consensus on the internet, and some real analysts have predicted this and that, so I better do the same".
 

Ieyke

New member
Jul 24, 2008
1,402
0
0
Dude has no special "magic" insight.

He was JUST claiming the new Xbox would come out on top.
That was before Microsoft actually unveiled the trainwreck that is the Xbone, but still, he's basically behind the curve on MY predictions.

We know the same stuff he does.
Everyone with half a brain can tell you the PS4 is going to steamroll the Xbone and that the Wii U is dysfunctional. That's just glaringly obvious at this point.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
Full Metal Bolshevik said:
It seems I'm in the minority when I think this generation of consoles will sell less consoles than the previous one.

Also, the generation started last year.
debatable. considering power of WiiU you coudl easily attribute it to current gen (PS3, Xbox360). If anything, WiiU is attempt to emulate current consoles way too late in the cycle.

el_kabong said:
I think it's funny that people often point to a future rise of PC gaming putting an end to console wars. You know what happens when PC gaming rises? More debate about which OS is best. It will swap one war for another, because people have a slavish need to defend their personal choices and force their opinions on strangers that truly have no affect on their lives.
But OS wars are so much mroe fun. at least there you dont have a huge elephant in the room that puts the war seem like kids bickering.
 

TiberiusEsuriens

New member
Jun 24, 2010
834
0
0
Adam Jensen said:
TiberiusEsuriens said:
He's got a point
He doesn't have a point. Nothing he says is his opinion. He reads gaming forums and and then spouts whatever the popular opinion is. Real analysts have predicted this months ago and this tosser is coming out with his "prediction" a week before the next-gen launch.
You sound like a very angry or disgruntled individual. Go eat your favorite dinner and feel better.
 

Robert Marrs

New member
Mar 26, 2013
454
0
0
I love this guy. I don't always agree with him and he says some dumb stuff from time to time but I never feel like he is being dishonest. Whenever patcher makes an analysis its exactly that. He is not a deluded fanboy with a conflict of interest he is a professional analyst doing his job. People don't like him because he says what he really thinks instead of buttering up his opinions to not offend anyone. I appreciate honesty a lot more than political correctness and 100% accuracy.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Church185 said:
Crap, Pachter is rooting for Sony.

Sony is DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMED!
Yeah, I'm calling it for...Nintendo? Microsoft? If Patcher believes the PS4 is going to win, it's pretty much the only one that can't.
Adam Jensen said:
He doesn't have a point. Nothing he says is his opinion. He reads gaming forums and and then spouts whatever the popular opinion is. Real analysts have predicted this months ago and this tosser is coming out with his "prediction" a week before the next-gen launch.
Two things:

1. You are giving Patcher WAAAAAY too much credit. No way is he that grounded in gaming opinions. His predictions are so frequently off the wall that he's got tobe reading YouTube comments (free money for following THIS LINK!!!, Ron Paul 2012).

2. Patcher is a real analyst. He's got a real job doing real analysis for a real company. This stuff doesn't seem to be what keeps him employed.

BONUS ROUND:

3. Honestly, most analysts are full of shit. Patcher just seems to not half-ass it. He's like the Peter Molyneux or Glenn Beck of games analysis.

Full Metal Bolshevik said:
It seems I'm in the minority when I think this generation of consoles will sell less consoles than the previous one.
Overall? Maybe. The Wii left a big hole to be filled.

Individually? Well, considering the (in my opinion undeserved) frenzy at launch, it's hard to imagine lower lifetime sales for the PS4 and Bone compared to their predecessors. I'm not precluding it, but I think it's unlikely.

I mean, what are you basing this on? It doesn't seem to be realistic.

Kwil said:
He's only "mostly right" if you use the most generous interpretation of "right".
For example, if he keeps predicting the irrelevence of consoles in a few years time, he will probably be eventually right. But he's predicted it like 9 billion times now. One would think routinely being wrong would count, but apparently not.

RicoADF said:
You know you've stuffed up when Michael Pachter can read the community better than the console maker....
But is that true? Guy was just pulling for the Xbone recently. Despite all evidence to the contrary. Is this really reading the market? Especially since he's attached it to yet another prediction that consoles will be irrelevant (this time for realz, yo).
 

GamemasterAnthony

New member
Dec 5, 2010
1,009
0
0
I'm not surprised. Personally, I think any of us here could've predicted that PS4 would do well. Between the epic fail that was all the drama of the XBOX One, the lack of anything Earth shattering with the Wii U, and the fact that the PS4 was built to be more friendly to third party and indie developers...predicting the PS4 would do quite well was pretty much a given.
 

Crimsonmonkeywar

New member
Oct 27, 2013
120
0
0
I love the people who think they can do Pachter's job or think his ramblings are what he gets paid for. GT gave him a platform to say things based from a business mindset. Kind of an inside look at how people like Kotick and Richotello work. In everyone one of his videos some ask him about things that no Analyst can guess or that he has no interest in understanding, so he gives an educated guess, which tends to be right, but is as reliable as weather predictions two months out.

When it comes to his actual job at Webbush, you know, the one that brings him in his six figure paycheck, the one that Ceo's call him in for, he's actually pretty damn good at. That said, no matter how much you ***** and moan he'll continue to have the show for as long as he wants it(or GT see's viable), and he'll continue to make predictions and get paid for it. He'll also continue to be an analyst until he decide he wants to retire.

Also, personality wise, he's pretty cool person(even though he's always wrong about my platform of choice, PC.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Full Metal Bolshevik said:
I just think more people by now realised PC is better. But yeah, maybe I'm giving humanity to much credit.
Or you could simply not attribute it to being "smart" or not.

Do you grow your own food? It's the "smart" thing to do.

Do you service your own car? It's the "smart" thing to do.

Do you maintain your own electrical work? It's the "smart" thing to do.

Part of the barrier to entry with computers is that people don't care enough about it to maintain it. You can make PCs as easy to operate and upgrade as possible, and people won't do it. But then, that's not any different from gardening, or maintaining a car, or any of hundreds of things you probably don't do every day.

Don't look down on people for not having the same interests as you do. Especially if you don't want them doing the same. It's part of why PC gamers are so routinely ridiculed.

But consols sales have something everyone should take into account but not many people do. How frail the console is and how many reiterations the console has. Look at DS and PS2, PS2 was frail and had a few reiterations. DS had a lot of redesigns, some people have both the first DS and lite, or lite and DSi, or all of them. Xbox 360 was also really frail and I bet many people bought two 360.

Let's see how physically strong PS4 and Xbone are. Wii U seems strong at least.
Who doesn't take this into account? It was immediately taken into account with PS2 and 360 sales. A better indicator would be software attach rate (which actually very likely favours PC users) or install base. I mean, seriously.

I'm also not sure what it matters. The new consoles will have revisions, so what does that mean for filling the shoes of last gen? The 3DS already has multiple revisions. The PSVita, too. Even if they're "strong" systems, why would the number of available revisions matter to anything you mentioned previous?
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Crimsonmonkeywar said:
I love the people who think they can do Pachter's job or think his ramblings are what he gets paid for.
Saying he's an idiot doesn't mean they think they can do his job. they just don't think he can do it.

In everyone one of his videos some ask him about things that no Analyst can guess or that he has no interest in understanding, so he gives an educated guess, which tends to be right, but is as reliable as weather predictions two months out.
If no analyst can predict these things, he really shouldn't be predicting them, then.

When it comes to his actual job at Webbush, you know, the one that brings him in his six figure paycheck, the one that Ceo's call him in for, he's actually pretty damn good at.
the "he has a good job" argument, which is almost as specious as the "you think you can do better?" argument.

It falls apart further when you consider how consulting works. When you look, for example, at all those finance firms that couldn't see the fiscal cliff coming. The nature of stocks as a gamble. The fact that prognostication really doesn't pan out as all that successful in the real world.

Yeah.

I mean, yeah. I'm sure he's crying all the way to the bank, but that doesn't justify anything. It doesn't even make him good at his job. If people can endanger lives and not get fired, why would it be an indicator here?
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
Full Metal Bolshevik said:
Strazdas said:
Full Metal Bolshevik said:
It seems I'm in the minority when I think this generation of consoles will sell less consoles than the previous one.

Also, the generation started last year.
debatable. considering power of WiiU you coudl easily attribute it to current gen (PS3, Xbox360). If anything, WiiU is attempt to emulate current consoles way too late in the cycle.
Not debatalbe since generation comes from age, not power.

1 year is not a big difference, hence WiiU belongs to the 8th generation. And even in power it's a considerable upgrade since it can run 1080p 60fps, unlike previous consoles.
That wont work either. Wii was the last console released of the generation, released at the very end (december) of 2006, capable of power that could be attributed to last gen back then. WiiU came 6 years later, as opposed to 2005-2013 that other consoles are doing (8 years). Nintendo was always 1 generation behind the rest (except back when it was competing with sega). Nintendo only now got into 7th generation with WiiU.
1080p 60 Fps thing, have you seen the games it can run on that? Original Xbox could run same games on that resolution. Take a game that current consoles run on (admitedly fake upscaled) 720p and you wont be able to run it on 720p on WiiU.

ALso, considering how poorly WiiU is doing, the current consoles completely dominate the market, so the new generation havent started yet anyway.

Zachary Amaranth said:
1. You are giving Patcher WAAAAAY too much credit. No way is he that grounded in gaming opinions. His predictions are so frequently off the wall that he's got tobe reading YouTube comments (free money for following THIS LINK!!!, Ron Paul 2012).
To be honest, somone here posted a link to nintedo forums where a person did analysis of his predictions. over 50% of them were true, thoug admitedly some of them were "GTA4 is going to do well" which is "no, duh" type of deal.
the ftrequency of "off the wall" opinions arent that big.

2. Patcher is a real analyst. He's got a real job doing real analysis for a real company. This stuff doesn't seem to be what keeps him employed.
His job is financial analist. his job is likely completely unrelated to gaming at all and he doesnt ahve any sway of buying or selling the companies stock to begin with. what he says about gaming is more of a hobby for him.

3. Honestly, most analysts are full of shit. Patcher just seems to not half-ass it. He's like the Peter Molyneux or Glenn Beck of games analysis.
No, most analysts are very good at their job. Its just that you will only see analsys that are full of shit on the news, because the good ones dont just go touting thier opinions - they sell them for money.

Overall? Maybe. The Wii left a big hole to be filled.

Individually? Well, considering the (in my opinion undeserved) frenzy at launch, it's hard to imagine lower lifetime sales for the PS4 and Bone compared to their predecessors. I'm not precluding it, but I think it's unlikely.

I mean, what are you basing this on? It doesn't seem to be realistic.
There were plenty of people with opinion of "nothing new here not getting the new one" as well as many people thinking "this is just a very limited PC, so i may as well just buy a normal PC", followed by many threads on forums of "help me build a PC". there is quite clear shift of at least part of gamers moving to PC market, so less sales is very possible.
another fact in, which we have no way to know yet, is failure rates. Some estimate Xbox 360 to have over 40% failure rate. Now imagine how many of the consoles sold are people who bought a new one after the old one failed. lets say Xbox One does not ahve this problem (its microsoft, but we can hope at least), thats 40% less sales, ok make it 30% since not everyone bought a second one. thats still sginificant fall.

For example, if he keeps predicting the irrelevence of consoles in a few years time, he will probably be eventually right. But he's predicted it like 9 billion times now. One would think routinely being wrong would count, but apparently not.
granted he did some pretty crappy claims, however back in 2006 pretty much EVERYONE claimed Wii is going to be a failure. and everyone was wrong. so i guess we are all bad analysts then.
(this is why i reserve my predictions about WiiU now, after all if Wii got successful anything that happen).

But is that true? Guy was just pulling for the Xbone recently. Despite all evidence to the contrary. Is this really reading the market? Especially since he's attached it to yet another prediction that consoles will be irrelevant (this time for realz, yo).
Consoles (and PCs, and phones, and tablets) are going to be irrelevant in the long term. Technologies change fast and we see new things emerging. Maybe it could easily be replaced by soemthing like Oculus Rift of Google Glass (Though the demo they shown now looks horrible) in 50 years. So hes not essentially wrong, hes just doing the same mistake everyone keep doing - do not account for conservatism of the consumer. not everyone is buying 4k TVs just because they exist now.

Zachary Amaranth said:
Or you could simply not attribute it to being "smart" or not.

Do you grow your own food? It's the "smart" thing to do.

Do you service your own car? It's the "smart" thing to do.

Do you maintain your own electrical work? It's the "smart" thing to do.
Bad comparison. Chosing a platform that is cheaper (in the long run), faster, more free and has plenty of other bonuses (like free multiplayer) and otherwise are clearly superior as far as is objectively measurable (there always going to be subjective measures, such as costumer service, which some people like soe dont, game choices) is the samrt thing to do. What sways people to buy these consoles are subjective reasons, the "Fear of complex PC myth", costumer loyalty, nostalgia, ect.
Now onto your "Examples".
I dont grow my own food except some vegetables. It is not a smart thing to do. Growing all food myself would be highly inefficient and not beneficial in any way. I also do not posses ability to terraform my location to be even able to grow some of that food to begin with (like peaches dont grow here). It is not the smart thing to do.
Do i service my own car? that depends on what you mean by servicing. keep it fixed and in working condition? yes i do. There are mandatory checks that i have to do at service place however and i do them. I as well am unable to do my own tire balansing as that takes machinery that i do not posses. buying it would NOT be a smart thing to do, as it only becomes feasible if i do it 10 times a day. It is cheaper to use services which make it economical by the amount of cars it balanses.
Do i maintain my own electric work? what does that mean? you mean electric instalation in my house? Yes, i do. Everyone should.

Part of the barrier to entry with computers is that people don't care enough about it to maintain it.
the maintenance is identical to console. You have to clean dust. You can opt out of it, and your console will overheat. same with PC.
You can make PCs as easy to operate and upgrade as possible, and people won't do it.
the real question here is why? mythical psichological fears? is that a good argument agasint PCs though?

Don't look down on people for not having the same interests as you do. Especially if you don't want them doing the same. It's part of why PC gamers are so routinely ridiculed.
And here i though our interests were to play the games we want in most efficient and cheap matter. I guess what you say some people have "interets" in using weaker and more expensive system. i call this waste.

When you look, for example, at all those finance firms that couldn't see the fiscal cliff coming.
They could. They jsut though they could evade the cliff. I mean heck, back in 2008 me and my fellow 1st year students predicted it. it wasnt hard. anyone analyzing economic data saw it. Thing is, being a small coutnry that was never hit by world crysis before, we were stupid enough to think this one wont affect us. we underestimated globality. I mean our government did pull though the best they could and won quite a few rewards for that but thats beside the point.
 

Crimsonmonkeywar

New member
Oct 27, 2013
120
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
Crimsonmonkeywar said:
I love the people who think they can do Pachter's job or think his ramblings are what he gets paid for.
Saying he's an idiot doesn't mean they think they can do his job. they just don't think he can do it.

In everyone one of his videos some ask him about things that no Analyst can guess or that he has no interest in understanding, so he gives an educated guess, which tends to be right, but is as reliable as weather predictions two months out.
If no analyst can predict these things, he really shouldn't be predicting them, then.

When it comes to his actual job at Webbush, you know, the one that brings him in his six figure paycheck, the one that Ceo's call him in for, he's actually pretty damn good at.
the "he has a good job" argument, which is almost as specious as the "you think you can do better?" argument.

It falls apart further when you consider how consulting works. When you look, for example, at all those finance firms that couldn't see the fiscal cliff coming. The nature of stocks as a gamble. The fact that prognostication really doesn't pan out as all that successful in the real world.

Yeah.

I mean, yeah. I'm sure he's crying all the way to the bank, but that doesn't justify anything. It doesn't even make him good at his job. If people can endanger lives and not get fired, why would it be an indicator here?
At the end of the day if he wasn't good at it, he wouldn't have it and companies wouldn't hire him. He still does, they still do. He's dealing in a billion dollar industry with millions of dollars always on the line. Which is more important to companies than 'endangering lives'.

The 'games' part of the industry he's in is more of a side project than anything.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Strazdas said:
To be honest, somone here posted a link to nintedo forums where a person did analysis of his predictions.
And it's already been dissected by people here, too. Honestly, it seems dishoenst to bring up something that's been answered already.

His job is financial analist.
I've already pointed out that. It seems you conveniently skipped that post and responded to other ones that conveniently don't address it.

No, most analysts are very good at their job. Its just that you will only see analsys that are full of shit on the news,
I've touched on this in more detail, too. If you wish to ignore it, go for it, I guess. that seems to be the trend here, and I'm kind of bored with repeating myself.

I dont grow my own food except some vegetables. It is not a smart thing to do. Growing all food myself would be highly inefficient and not beneficial in any way.
Except it's the cheapest and healthiest way to do things. I see, so when you were talking about the benefits of PC it was okay to list them in a vacuum, but now you're making excuses for why you don't grow your own food.

But that's the point. and precisely why it's not a bad example.

I mean, honestly, if you're going to ignore the context here, which deals with accessibility of PC and level of interest, then you're just being dishonest. You seem to also be relying on word salad in order to obfuscate core issues.

the maintenance is identical to console.
I didn't know that PCs never needed upgrading. Sweet.

They could. They jsut though they could evade the cliff.
That's not what their own documents claim. Strange.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Crimsonmonkeywar said:
[
At the end of the day if he wasn't good at it, he wouldn't have it and companies wouldn't hire him.
The people who missed the fiscal cliff and nearly drove an entire country to collapse still get work. In the same fields. for large salaries. And they still get their golden parachutes, so if we go over another cliff, they will still be well off. I don't think I need to go any further to demonstrate why your argument is wrong.

This is the problem with most economic branches. Statisticians have been pointing this sort of thing out for decades. It is commonly said that the definition of insanity is repeating the same steps and expecting a different outcome. This is also called "economics."

But seriously, the "still employed, ergo good at job" fallacy is readily belied by the number of people who aren't good at their jobs and maintain employment.

On another note, Donald Trump is considered fiscally savvy for the same reasons. What's ignored is that he's declared bankruptcy four times.

But people are still paying him and investing in him. People still put stock in what he says, so he must know what he's talking about, right?