this isnt my name said:
S what sitting down with your hands together talking to yourself is fine, but wearing something isnt ?
Its no stupider/less logical.
HontooNoNeko said:
Wait I want to keep a list for things like this.
Ok so it is alright for someone to believe that their omnipotent creator sent his only son to earth (that was actually himself in some sects) to die for the sins of mankind and then be brought back to life by said creator(that may or not be himself) and is remembered by hanging a cross around your neck which happens to be the instrument of torture and death for said savior of humanity is completely acceptable.
Wearing a pasta strainer to indicate that you have yet to undergo the straining ritual which cleanses you of all unnecessary bi-products and become a pure noodly appendage of the flying spaghetti monster calls for mental evaluation?
Did I miss some fine print or something? I think I need a bigger list for what is acceptable in this world.
Established religions essentially serve a socialization function to the culture (i.e. people are conditioned to pray from birth to a being who may-or-may-not be there, according to the established beliefs of the culture), and are therefore less likely to be the mark of someone with a lack of mental faculties, due to it being "normal."
Due to the modern-day duality of greater skepticism toward supposedly supernatural phenomena, and religious beliefs (rational or not) still existing within the broader culture, I think it is perfectly understandable to cast suspicion on some random dude who wants to wear a pasta strainer on their head, due to "religious beliefs," for their drivers license photo. I mean, I'd certainly think they might be a little off.
Now, had Pastafarianism established itself millenia before now, and it was essentially serving the same roles that other religions do right now, then I'd likely be saying the same thing about some other religion. Like Islam with the Burqa, for example. Or Judaism with the Yarmulke.
Is it fair? No. Is it understandable, given the fact that established religions are basically social institutions? Yeah.