Even that third party Steambox they showcased a few days ago had a AMD GPU... I think they are starting to panic. Even if PC gaming does great this console generation, Nvidia will be in for some very hard years.
The thing is, everything up to ACIII was relatively good in terms of porting.Covarr said:Ubisoft's PC ports are pretty hit and miss (more miss). Unlike other companies, they do take PC pretty seriously, it's just they're incapable of actually getting it right.Akichi Daikashima said:Vsync is off.
I always turn it off when investigating how well the game can run on my pc.
And when on max, its at 30-40 fps when I am just exploring an island, on ship battles it could very well drop to like, 20.
I don't play it on max, but the fact that I can't at a decent framerate pisses me off, as my card more than meets the recommended requirements, and can run Far Cry 3 on Max at a constant 60fps.
P.S. Thanks
By repeating advertising verbatim?Kheapathic said:The Escapist has to cater to their largest audience, otherwise they run risk of losing clicks.Toadfish1 said:"Company that makes all its money from convincing PC gamers to buy their products says its products are better than alternative".
Seriously, why is this even being reported?
Everyone says this, yet it never feels true. My 360 needed to update constantly. Whenever I popped in new games, update. Whenever MSoft decided to change the dashboard, update. When I downloaded some title from the store, update. The only updates my computer needs is a antivirus update that does itself automatically in the background, a windows update that only requires 2 clicks to get through, and a graphics driver update that again takes 2 clicks to get through.Colt47 said:It's almost as if Nvidia forgets that the primary reason consoles exist is to provide a stable, low maintenance means of enjoying video game software. The PC will always be better than consoles as far as performance, but it pays for it in stability and a need for regular maintenance.
Charcharo said:Yes, nVidia, the PC is superior, but not exactly for the reasons you gave.
The PC is better because its cheaper in the long run, it is a requirement in today's world anyway and because of its greater library, backwards compatibility and modding.
These 2 comments should go to a date, consume insane amount of alcohol and meth, then have a babyfix-the-spade said:I think this is another part of Nvidia's PR war to help convince themselves that abandoning the console market to AMD was a good idea.
Time will tell, with the way online functionality is going I can see the gap between consoles and PC getting ever narrower from a functionality standpoint (enjoy you DRM console players!), but whether that translates to fewer or more consoles remains to be seen.
I haven't looked at Project Shield sales yet. Still too pricey for me. I'd need a Gen 6 Nvidia card and a $300 hand unit to really get some value from it. And wireless HDMI isn't ready for prime time yet. Soon it will be. At that time, I don't know if enough people know about this to be interested. But if it catches on, it could be a game changer. Big if, but a possibility.rofltehcat said:Even that third party Steambox they showcased a few days ago had a AMD GPU... I think they are starting to panic. Even if PC gaming does great this console generation, Nvidia will be in for some very hard years.
Even as a PC Gaming Elitist myself I have to ask if you can get that kind of power in under a 400 dollar package...cause last I checked that was about half the price of one Titan.truckspond said:PC has a larger library including EVERY previous console generation and the GTX Titan kicks the crap out of EVERY consoles GPU so it's not really that surprising. If you want high-end gaming just put in 4 titans in quad-SLI and crank everything up to 11 at 4K+ resolutions. Can you get such power in a console?