Or it implies that most of the time you aren't honest.BeeGeenie said:I've always disliked the phrase "just sayin'" or "I'm just being honest."
As if that somehow absolves you of any consequences of whatever dickish thing you just said.
Or it implies that most of the time you aren't honest.BeeGeenie said:I've always disliked the phrase "just sayin'" or "I'm just being honest."
As if that somehow absolves you of any consequences of whatever dickish thing you just said.
Oh that one just drives me up the wall. Even after they tell you what the problem is, that phrase will still be used. "You don't understand" and "You wouldn't understand" makes it sound like they are the only ones that go through what they go through and mostly automatically assume that I may not have been through the same thing. Granted, not everyone goes through the same thing but when someone uses that phrase over and over again, there is no point engaging with them. You want to help but it turns aggressive so you will just have to back off. You are right, we won't understand unless you say it.SonOfVoorhees said:"You wouldnt understand?" When you ask some one whats up, and they reply with that phrase. Well how can i understand if you wont even tell me?
Nothing, just that generally it's easier said than done.Kolby Jack said:What's wrong with believing in yourself?Jim Trailerpark said:The usual "believe in yourself", "accept yourself as you are" alleged self-help slacktivist bullshit annoy the living piss out of me. That and general justification of any lazy/irresponsible action
Oh my GOD, this one! I had a friend in middle school who would always use these phrases to justify being an asshole. That, or "Get a sense of humour!". It pretty much sends me into a berserker mode whenever I hear it being used seriously.BeeGeenie said:I've always disliked the phrase "just sayin'" or "I'm just being honest."
As if that somehow absolves you of any consequences of whatever dickish thing you just said.
I know, right? You know the phrase "time is money?" In terms of repair services, I realize now it means "take however much time you need, but keep in mind that the customer will not wait forever." Think of it in terms of taking your laptop in to be fixed on January. Fast forward to June and the customer comes in and demands a refund and the laptop back. Well done, you lost a customer and gained no money. My situation is worse than that though because the repairs can be done at home. The reason I didn't is because I have a tremor and a lack of coordination and the fix has a bunch of small pieces that I don't want to lose. It shows just how much time it should not take.Meriatressia said:Have some patience, ugh. That would get really annoying. That is way too long to wait for something to get fixed.cojo965 said:With all that stuff about dogs and cats, what is your opinion on other choices of pets?Meriatressia said:There are a lot I hate.
Combined words. I really hate stupid combined words.
Like guestimate.
It's not the same as portmanteaus used for a reason. Like 'gorn', which is gore and porn.
It's just nonsensical words that make no sense. They actually weaken adn contradict the words.
Guestimate, is really stupid. Estimate is a exact word. Guess is a vague word.
I hate the ridiculous over the top stupidity of things like
I don't want to live on this planet anymore, etc. Anything of the kind that implies they want to leave the planet because of something minor and stupid.
Or that crap were they take one bad thing and act like they lost a nonexistant faith in people.
'I lost all faith in humanity' is one. Since when did you HAVE faith in humanity to begin with?!
And you're going to dismiss the nice and good people, as well as the bad now? Just because of one thing?!
If you have faith in something, it's your religion, not people!
Anything that implies animals are saints piss' me off. Or tries to enforce some draconian idea that every one wants a dog or cat.
Animals never hurt each other. Animals ar'nt evil. Animals are saintly. And all that crap.
Excuse me! Have you SEEN what predaters do?! Have seen what animals do to each other?! Some of them are freaking cannibals!
Dogs always love you. Dogs are so loyal.And all that crap. Nothing loves you like a dog. Humans bad, dogs good. Dogs are lovely and perfect.
They're pack animals. They're predesposed to swear loyalty to the pack leader. FFS!
Or implying cats are saintly. Or this idiocy
The sound of happiness is a cat puring. And variations.
Cats are mercurial beasts who take what they want. And for that I respect them more. If the cats purring, it's most likely because it got what it wanted. Not because it loves you.
And that bloody draconianly phrases rubbish that some have that everyone must love animals and have a pet. Especially dogs. Oh gods, the dog pushing is painful!
One of the worst is this
Every home must have a dog and every dog must have a home.
Excuse me?! Who the firetruck are you to tell me what I should have or not! I hate dogs! They're smelly, loud, and have disgusting habits.
I'm never having a pet ever again! For the record, my pets were budgerigars.
I don't hate dogs in a general sense. One of the best charities I've seen is Nowzad, a charity that helps people and animals in afghanistan, including dogs. It educates and helps the natives and sends the animals soldiers adopted back to their homes. Or find them homes.
But I don't like dogs personally. They're dirty animals with bad habits.
Nowzad is a sensible charity. They don't do the stupidity mentioned here.
Apparently the idiots think that everyone must love the animal of choice.
Despite these cretinous things being often on the same pages as worthy, boring, ranting about puppy mills and badly treated animals.
Yes, they really think sociopaths, dog fighters, and lunatics and idiots should have a pet.
Noticablely, people who have or like birds and fish, rabbits, guinea pigs, etc, they don't do this stupidity. If they do, it's well hidden and rare.
I've never seen anyone declare that you must love budgerigars or goldfish.
PC master race.
The total and utter cretins who use this obviously never saw the zero punctuation video it came from.
Were it was very clearly used to insult pc elitists.
Apparently the idiots who use it are so thick they don't get it.
And they never heard of the association with nazism that the words 'master race' has.
O.T. Mine is something if I'm told this now I'll be pissed.
"Have some patience." I'm sorry but I have plenty of that but it has been half a year and the tech guy that's supposed to be fixing my gun has apparently still not gotten around to fixing it, my patience is not at an all time high right now. In case you think I'm exaggerating, I sent it in back in March.
I seem to only hate that phrase if one side of the relationship is expecting the other side to say that phrase first... I'm sorry, but I thought actions speak louder than words? This phrase seems more like something expressed through actions and not just by saying this one phrase at "the right moment"...Me55enger said:"I love you."
That's a phrase that can piss off.
No. He's closed minded because he can't even comprehend that someone with different views might be a nice person giving him a complement. And it is not dumping their diety on him because of the intent behind their comment. So many people focus on the actual words and refuse to think about the meaning. As I explained in my comment, they are not meaning it in a "I'm taking your will away and giving it to God" way. They are meaning it in a "you are very special because this thing that I sincerely believe in is paying special attention to you" way.TheNewGuy said:So he's closed minded for wanting to believe he has free will, and for wanting to think that his accomplishments are his own doing, and not having the credit for them given to another?
They absolutely are someone dumping their deity into someone else's accomplishments by saying that;, because it's them essentially saying "You didn't do that, my god did that, you should be thanking him." You might be able to see how someone who's atheist or agnostic might be annoyed at losing credit for their accomplishments to something they don't even believe exists.
Silvanus said:But that's my entire point. However it sounds to someone with opposite beliefs should be irrelevant because you/they should know that the meaning is meant to be sincere. Whether you believe it or not, you should at least appreciate that the person is complementing you and that should make you feel good. As I said in another reply, it's the intent behind the complement that counts, not necessarily the complement itself.Jacco said:I understand that's how it sounds to a believer, but it has an altogether different implication to a non-believer. It sounds to a non-believer as if it's taking their accomplishment, and attributing it to something else.
A compliment should make the receiver feel good. It's not a well-judged compliment.
This is primarily an error of understanding, though. I recognise the intention.
exactly, there is no one phrase that pisses me off, what i can't stand is when people use a common phrase incorrectly. although in their defense trying to correct someone who says "i could care less" is wasted energy, as they have already voiced that they don't care lol even if spoken incorrectly you knew what they meant and they don't care about how they said it .archiebawled said:"I could care less." the words mean literally the opposite of "I couldn't care less."
David Mitchell makes the case quite nicely here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=om7O0MFkmpw
If that is so, then it's another reason people shouldn't use compliments that the intended receiver cannot really relate to.Jacco said:But that's my entire point. However it sounds to someone with opposite beliefs should be irrelevant because you/they should know that the meaning is meant to be sincere. Whether you believe it or not, you should at least appreciate that the person is complementing you and that should make you feel good. As I said in another reply, it's the intent behind the complement that counts, not necessarily the complement itself.
I agree with you. In a perfect world, you would be correct. We we live in a decidedly imperfect world and as such, must react to it accordingly. People use their own experiences and beliefs to interact with others and for peaceful cooperation to take place, those others need to be able to relate to that, whether they agree or believe it or not.Silvanus said:If that is so, then it's another reason people shouldn't use compliments that the intended receiver cannot really relate to.Jacco said:But that's my entire point. However it sounds to someone with opposite beliefs should be irrelevant because you/they should know that the meaning is meant to be sincere. Whether you believe it or not, you should at least appreciate that the person is complementing you and that should make you feel good. As I said in another reply, it's the intent behind the complement that counts, not necessarily the complement itself.
A compliment should be for the receiver.
The imperfectness of the world has not stopped me from complimenting others in a manner that focuses on them, and is not tied to my own worldview/ beliefs.Jacco said:I agree with you. In a perfect world, you would be correct. We we live in a decidedly imperfect world and as such, must react to it accordingly. People use their own experiences and beliefs to interact with others and for peaceful cooperation to take place, those others need to be able to relate to that, whether they agree or believe it or not.
Oh, jeez, yes, same sentiment.Mr. Eff said:"That's just the way it is."
In a similar vein. It means you are too lazy to have morality or principles with which to meaningfully combat a problem.