Good stuff. The only fail is the stock for the modern Thompson - it's too low and would cause hideous muzzle climb.the monopoly guy said:Moar dakka!
A modern Thompson with an integrated silencer and bandoleer.
And I tried giving this one a stock.
The Meytarch 5.7 Grinder Plus! Firing the 5.7 mm round and fitting with a bullpup shotgun, the Meytarch 5.7 Grinder Plus is the ultimate in CQB!
The Meytarch 5.56 Shredder Grenadier! The Compact but powerful Meytarch 5.56 Shredder Grenadier will blow away the competition!
The Meytarch 5.56 or 5.7 Mulcher! Silencer and compensator ready, and complete with optic rail the Meytarch f.56/ 5.7 Mulcher is ready for anything!
The Meytarch 7.62x51 Clipper! It'll only take a little off the top...of your head! The Meytarch 7.62x51 Clipper, doesn't even give them a chance!
A Famas-ish type assault rifle. It's not mean to look like a Famas, but it was inspired by it. That thing on the stock/action is the ejection port.
Some companies have made 40 and 45-round drum magazines for the 1911 in the past (discontinued because they tended to suck tremendously) and there's 25 / 30 round straight mags floating around for those who like a foot and a half of mag sticking out the bottom of their pistol. There's also at least one guy who knocked up a belt-fed 1911. Seriously.Sn1P3r M98 said:
Really? It seems to be about as low as a normal Thompson stock, but I could be wrong. And I imagine it wouldn't be any worse than having no stock anyway.NimbleJack3 said:
Firstly, I believe you mean to say "AR15", the M4 is the military designation for an exact type of AR15. Secondly, yes it can. An AR15 upper reciever can have a replacement of the gas system removing the need for a buffer tube. The most famous example of this is probably the LR300 , which bears the most similarity to the AR15, and the upper can be dropped directly onto any basic AR15, making it the best example, though there are others. (Such as the SA80 and G36, the hipster black sheep of the AR15 family =p )MaxMees said:
Yeah, but he's not trying to call anyone out on it! =pMaxMees said:
Nope, it's now a genericised trademark for carbine AR15s [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M4_carbine#Trademark_issues], after Colt Defense lost their infringement suit against Bushmaster Firearms.Daverson said:
These days that's the Para-Ordinance USA Tactical Target Rifle. It's also a rarity in that it's one of the few examples of an M4gery that can use a folding stock (Alan Zitta's gas system for the LR300 design being patented certainly didn't help with that). There's only a handful of M4-pattern (or carbine AR15-pattern, if you're going to insist on that) weapons that don't retain the buffer piston assembly.Daverson said:
You're confusing the AR15 with the AR18. Also, I'd love to see how you're supposed to fit a folding stock to the SA80, what with it being a bullpup design and all; fit a stock to the stock, perhaps?Daverson said:
Calm down. This thread is pretty much all about technical criticism, there's no need to be rude. What constitues as pedantic elswhere is pretty much the norm here. Unless you're like me and A) Ask specifically for only aesthetic criticism and B) make ridiculous guns that wouldn't work anyway.Daverson said:
I would consider the DOD knows better what an M4 is than the courts do... Colt never had any claim over the name "M4", their original designation for the rifle was different (don't know exactly what it was, something like Colt Model 603, which was their designation for the M16A1)Evil Tim said:
MaxMees said:Here's another addition to my bullpup series.
I love it personally but all criticisms are welcome, I'm sure I slipped up somewhere in there.
The weapon system is designed for quick barrel and lower receiver changes, apart from the high power Sniper Rifle and SMG which would take a little more fiddling. The casings are ejected diagonally so that almost any casing will fit through.
cheers guyscuddlesRT75 said:right here's another kit for you guys, it features 2 of my older creations the Vostrad Mk 1 sniper rifle and the Vyper PDW - Please note - the vyper uses the forward ejector port system of the F2000.
"The F2000 uses a unique ejection system, ejecting spent cartridge casings forward and to the right side of the weapon?through a tube running alongside the barrel. This method of ejection provides for fully ambidextrous operation; the rifle can be used without any modification by both right and left-handed shooters. This ejection pattern was achieved by using a swiveling polymer tray, which intercepts the empty casing from the bolt face immediately after disengaging from the extractor. As the empty casing is extracted it is held while the rocker assembly tilts to lift it above and clear of the feed path as the next round is stripped from the magazine by the bolt head. The casing is fed into the tray located in a cavity in the receiver wall, which then pivots the cartridge case and directs it into a chute (above the barrel); the case is discarded from the tilting tray by being impacted by a pin on the moving bolt carrier upon its forward return. Only when the ejection tube contains more than five cases is the first of them ejected forward through a port just behind and to the right of the muzzle." - taken from Wikipedia article on F2000.
The forward ejector port is the silver bit on the front of the Vyper
There's also an ACR, just because I like ACRs
Comments and crits as usual.
Crits would be welcomecuddlesRT75 said:So having not posted in a few days I thought I would post my special ops kit.
There's a modified SVD, and a modified MP5, culminating with a scratch built pistol called the Wasp - fires .45 ACP has 3-round burst capability and a 20 rd mag.
