HankMan said:
Fraud! Fraud I say!
The Ninja party has clearly been excluded!
How would you know? It's the ninja party. They wouldn't even appear on your ballot.
http://www.theonion.com/video/ninja-parade-slips-through-town-unnoticed-once-aga,14181/
Celtic_Kerr said:
I don't want to know what you're doing about what YOU think is right. I want to know what you think about EVERYTHING. I don't JUST want your thoughts on net neutrality and everything, but what else do you plan to do to make this Country great?
Every time I've spoken to a Partie Quebecois supporter, and I ask them what they plan to do for Canada (because they're a federal partie), and all they do is say "seperate" okay... then what? "Um.... establish a government and laws and regulations and programs" how? "Well it's in the plan" ........ right.... That's all their focus on. the government would crumble if you spent every dollar trying to achieve just ONE goal
I can see the same thing with these people.... "What are your plan for the country?" "NET NEUTRALITY!" what else? "GAHHHHH!!!!!!!" I can see them fighting for THEIR ideals so hard, they ignore the rest
Every one of our candidates has a comprehensive platform [http://mikkel.ca/platform/]. I talk about mine as much as I do about the party's. We are the only democratic political party in Canada, because our MPs can actually speak directly for their constituents.
icyneesan said:
Im waiting to see if I get any free swag from one of the parties. I demand they give me free stuff so they can have my vote! Voting because I believe a group is responsible? Screw that, give me free stuff!
Done and done. Email me your mailing address and I'll send you a bumper sticker.
[email protected]
Nimbus said:
Hell, Ireland should get one of these. All our parties are so well-hated that these guys could probably win a majority!
Ireland had one briefly [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_Party_Ireland]. It doesn't anymore.
RelexCryo said:
"The Pirate Party of Canada is running on a platform of dramatic copyright reform in favor of artists and consumers, tightened privacy laws, an overhaul of patent laws that would see the elimination of patents in areas including software, pharmaceuticals and genetics, net neutrality and "open government."
With all due respect, the elimination of patents is idiotic. Patents actually favor small bussinesses, not large bussinesses. Large bussinesses have marketing, investors, huge employee bases, and massive manufacturing centers. Small bussinesses only- I repeat, ONLY- have their patented ideas. Take that away from them, and big bussiness will have everything. It is true small bussiness with be able to use the ideas of big bussiness...but big bussiness will also be able to steal the ideas of small bussiness. And big bussiness has many, many advantages other than their patents...whereas patented ideas are the only advantage small companies have.
Then why do companies like Apple own thousands of patents? Do they really need their protection? What about huge pharmaceutical companies? They use patents to keep drug prices artificially high, keeping them out of the hands of the people who need them most and costing our health care system billions of dollars a year. Patents help small businesses? What about the entrepreneur who fights up through a saturated market on a great idea, only to be hit by a multimillion dollar patent lawsuit by someone who came up with a vaguely similar idea but couldn't be bothered to do anything about it?
No, patents are seriously broken.
Space Jawa said:
that would see the elimination of patents in areas including software, pharmaceuticals and genetics
Which would in turn no doubt see the elimination of major software, pharmaceutical, and genetics innovations in Canada. Possibly the death of those industries in the country all together. I can't possibly imagine how that's a good thing.
You'll excuse me if I don't shed a tear for poor big pharma. They pulled in record profits last year, yet somehow they still needed to scale back their research departments. Yes, a reasonable patent term would hurt them, and it would save the government over $3 billion. That buys a lot of medical research. Rather than throwing it at a middleman and somehow hoping that they'll turn it around and use the money how we want it to be used, wouldn't it make more sense to offer that money as research grants instead?
Thanks all for your interest.
Mikkel Paulson
Leader
Pirate Party of Canada [https://www.pirateparty.ca/]