Pixar's worst movie

badgersprite

[--SYSTEM ERROR--]
Sep 22, 2009
3,820
0
0
Cars really wasn't great, in my opinion. I also think it had the worst animation of any of their movies. Although, considering Pixar is Pixar, I'm willing to give them credit that they'll try really hard to make Cars 2 way better.
 

Flac00

New member
May 19, 2010
782
0
0
Lulzer69 said:
None of the movies were good, I admit they have nostalgia factor, but they were not truly good. They weren't bad, but they were definitely not good. They all had the same plot.
Really? And what is that plot.
 

ExaltedK9

New member
Apr 23, 2009
1,148
0
0
RAKtheUndead said:
ExaltedK9 said:
Maybe because I matured mentally past the age of 11...

That could explain your hyper-sensetivity. I'm not sorry I dislike a crappy (G rated?) movie that you thought was 'Teh Bomb!'

And did I put an 'e' where an 'o' shoul have been? (Sorry, I didn't realizes I was talking to a pre-pubesent grammar nazi, or I would've paid extra special attention to my spelling.)

The world is filled with different opinions kiddo, you would do well to learn not to be a prick about them. Especially over a shitty movie like up.
"Sensitivity", "Realise", "Pubescent", "Should". Learn how to spell. Or, better yet, stop using words with more than two syllables. That should cure your spelling problem in an instant.
Sorry, didn't mean to trigger your OCD. Do you need to go burn your clothes now?
 

ExaltedK9

New member
Apr 23, 2009
1,148
0
0
Caliostro said:
ExaltedK9 said:
Maybe because I matured mentally past the age of 11...

That could explain your hyper-sensetivity. I'm not sorry I dislike a crappy (G rated?) movie that you thought was 'Teh Bomb!'

And did I put an 'e' where an 'o' shoul have been? (Sorry, I didn't realizes I was talking to a pre-pubesent grammar nazi, or I would've paid extra special attention to my spelling.)

The world is filled with different opinions kiddo, you would do well to learn not to be a prick about them. Especially over a shitty movie like up.
No, you really didn't. That's the problem. You still think saying you're mature is the same as being mature. Also, and hilariously, you spelled pre-pubescent wrong. AGAIN.

But whether you like it or not, Up is an objectively good movie, the fact that you failed to comprehend how it subtly approaches extremely "heavy" and serious themes such as existentialism, life, loss, grieving, coping, recovery and empowerment while still having more action and emotional highs and lows than the majority of high budget "serious" movies lead me to think that you're either not as smart as you think you are, or trolling.

Let me guess, you saw the cartoon aesthetic and figured "IS A 'TOON! MAEK ME LAUF!", and when the characters didn't start by doing ridiculous and overblown actions or doing slapstick humor, then obviously it was boring! Did you think Michael Bay's Transformers were timeless masterpieces too? Or that Twilight was an incredible novel?

And I was being facetious, but, quoth the raven: "Nevermore".
You're having a meltdown because I said I thought a Pixar movie was boring, and I'm the immature one? I gotta say, I'm not a fan of your twisted logic.

And movies are not objective. How good they are is a matter of opinion. Mine being that up was boring as hell. But I'm glad that it sent you on a magical rollercoaster of emotions. Oh, and up was a high budget movie. (It is Pixar after all) And any animated 3D movie takes a small fortune to actually animate, along with thousands of man hours.

Oh, and I'm not trolling, just expressing an opinion, which incidently sent you into a tailspin of anxiety.

And is that a spelling error I see? What do ya' know, it looks like you're human as well. But regardless, I'm gonna ***** about it on a public forum because it offends me in ways you can't ever comprehend.... (I'm being facetious, by the way.)

And to answer your questions, in order:

No, I didn't dislike it because it was animated, or terribly devoid of car chases.

Transformers was ok, and I have never touched a Twilight novel.

So please, stop throwing you bloody tampons at me just because I thought that up was slow in a few places.

PS. Didn't I only spell pre-pubecsent (if thats how you spell it) one time?
 

SalamanderJoe

New member
Jun 28, 2010
1,378
0
0
Hmm, not sure really. I wasn't too sure about Cars and I'm not exactly in a rush to see Toy Story 3 either.
 
Nov 27, 2010
289
0
0
^=ash=^ said:
I hated Toy Story 2, enough so that I didn't bother to see 3. So to me that is the worst film by Pixar.
I know this is your opinion or whatever, but I am officially not speaking to you.

OT: I think Wall-E was the worst (which is not saying much). I think it sucked that they brought humans into the story, I would have much rather if they just kept it on good old garbage filled Earth, and I know the folks at Pixar have the talent to do so.

Also, Ratatiouille. I don't know, I just think it's overrated.
 

V TheSystem V

New member
Sep 11, 2009
996
0
0
ExaltedK9 said:
UP was pretty boring.
He be trollin'. I hatin'.

I loved Up. Is my favourite Pixar film next to the Toy Story series (if I had to pick a favourite out of those it would probably be 3. One of the only films to make me cry) and Monsters Inc.

Least favourite...probably Cars or WALL-E. WALL-E pretty much discarded the plot to give us a robot in hilarious situations and Cars was too long. Neither of them were bad films, just were disappointing.
 

Urgh76

New member
May 27, 2009
3,083
0
0
The Incredibles just weren't that good for me, at all.

UP however, that was a good movie!
 

ExaltedK9

New member
Apr 23, 2009
1,148
0
0
V TheSystem V said:
ExaltedK9 said:
UP was pretty boring.
He be trollin'. I hatin'.

I loved Up. Is my favourite Pixar film next to the Toy Story series (if I had to pick a favourite out of those it would probably be 3. One of the only films to make me cry) and Monsters Inc.

Least favourite...probably Cars or WALL-E. WALL-E pretty much discarded the plot to give us a robot in hilarious situations and Cars was too long. Neither of them were bad films, just were disappointing.
Ain't be trollin' dawg, just statin' my passive opinions, dig?
 

V TheSystem V

New member
Sep 11, 2009
996
0
0
ExaltedK9 said:
V TheSystem V said:
ExaltedK9 said:
UP was pretty boring.
He be trollin'. I hatin'.

I loved Up. Is my favourite Pixar film next to the Toy Story series (if I had to pick a favourite out of those it would probably be 3. One of the only films to make me cry) and Monsters Inc.

Least favourite...probably Cars or WALL-E. WALL-E pretty much discarded the plot to give us a robot in hilarious situations and Cars was too long. Neither of them were bad films, just were disappointing.
Ain't be trollin' dawg, just statin' my passive opinions, dig?
I don't dig. But that reminds me. Up has the character of Dug. Dug is awesome. Show Dug some respect and give his film some recognition. It was great. It handled issues that other kids films (most notably any made by Dreamworks) wouldn't dream (forgive the pun) of handling because they don't want to alienate the audience. So tell me, is that why you didn't like Up? What Pixar films DO you like?
 

Kenko

New member
Jul 25, 2010
1,098
0
0
MulticolorCharizard said:
Probably Cars, it just fel to "kiddie film" for me.
ExaltedK9 said:
UP was pretty boring.
OH NO YOU DID NOT
What he said, Cars suck and the guy dissing up needs to have his dick cut of and shoved in his mouth. -MacGruber.
 

tseroff

New member
Jun 8, 2009
206
0
0
Flac00 said:
Lulzer69 said:
None of the movies were good, I admit they have nostalgia factor, but they were not truly good. They weren't bad, but they were definitely not good. They all had the same plot.
Really? And what is that plot.
I'm going to quote Yahtzee Croshaw here with an excerpt from his old website after he saw Wall-E.
"One or more lovable protagonists have existed for some time in a stable but fundamentally flawed routine, which is shaken up by the introduction of a foreign entity, usually another character, around whom attitudes are initially hostile. Attempts to deal with this character eventually lead to the protagonist(s) discovering a new, unfamiliar world, and in doing so discover the nature of the fundamental flaw in their routine. Villains are usually introduced or only become truly villainous from around the mid-point or quite late into the film. Along the way the heroes enlist the help of various lesser characters with clearly definable quirks and at one point reluctantly enter a high-speed chase. The villain is generally finally defeated with surprising ease, and everything concludes in an emotionally manipulative ending in which routine is restored with the fundamental flaw excised.

Now, consider how many Pixar movies that could be describing. Consider it, me bitches."
 

hecticpicnic

New member
Jul 27, 2010
465
0
0
In order of alright to bad That one with rats in it,it was ok justt didn't nail the charm that other pixar films had Bug's Life this is one of pixars earlier movies and today looking back looks crap they didn't use what they have to good affect like toy story the storys is bad too,Cars unremarkable characters,bad story and not funny(it seemed to be tring so hard)
 

Polarix

New member
Jul 3, 2009
205
0
0
jack583 said:
Polarix said:
Snip for length.

jack583 said:
was "meet the robisons" pixar or dreamworks?
because i hated how screwed up their veiws on time travle works.

but if that is dreamworks then i say "the incredibles".
i really only liked the first robot fight scene.
Meet the Robinsons was made by Walt Disney without the help of Pixar. I only know this after I searched for it on Wikipedia just now because I never saw the movie myself.
just to be sure that we are talking about the same film:
"meet the robisons": new animated film about a boy genius who gets to travel to the future by way of some random kid from the future (later turns out to be the smart kids future son) that goes back to fix an error he made in his time.

"swiss family robinson": old live action film about a family that gets stranded on an unmarked island and survives via making a house and gadgets that were so advanced given the materials avalable they must have been made by using blue prints writen by "the professor" from the sitcom "gilligans island".

i only ask because you said the film was made by walt disney--who is dead--and not the disney corporation. if you had said the latter i would not have responded, but since you said the first i just wanted to double check.
No I was talking about Meet the Robinsons but I agree with you that Disney has gotten a lot worse at the turn of the century. I mean almost all of thier new live action movies are completely horrible. To be honest, the only really good films that were made exclusively by Disney in the 2000s were the Pirates of the Caribbean series and Tron Legacy. I only said Walt Disney because that is the name they put on most of their movie boxes.

Also sorry for me taking so long to respond back to your comment, I was enjoying New Year's Eve.
 

Caliostro

Headhunter
Jan 23, 2008
3,253
0
0
ExaltedK9 said:
You're having a meltdown because I said I thought a Pixar movie was boring, and I'm the immature one? I gotta say, I'm not a fan of your twisted logic.

Oh, and I'm not trolling, just expressing an opinion, which incidently sent you into a tailspin of anxiety.
Yes, I'm having a meltdown because I'm using correct English. I'm guessing Ernest Hemingway wrote nothing but constant hissy fits then.

Yeah, I get it. Just saying [http://blognolife.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/trollface.png].

ExaltedK9 said:
And movies are not objective. How good they are is a matter of opinion. Mine being that up was boring as hell. But I'm glad that it sent you on a magical rollercoaster of emotions. Oh, and up was a high budget movie. (It is Pixar after all) And any animated 3D movie takes a small fortune to actually animate, along with thousands of man hours.
Open to debate. But I know Up was a big budget production, as are most "main" Pixar enterprises. I wasn't implying that Pixar was low budget, was making it clear that I wasn't even including the "smaller" B-list movies in the comparison.


ExaltedK9 said:
And is that a spelling error I see? What do ya' know, it looks like you're human as well. But regardless, I'm gonna ***** about it on a public forum because it offends me in ways you can't ever comprehend.... (I'm being facetious, by the way.)
You never read The Raven [http://www.heise.de/ix/raven/Literature/Lore/TheRaven.html] then. Or, you know, pretty much anything written... what? More than a century ago?

I'll pretend I'm surprised.

ExaltedK9 said:
And to answer your questions, in order:

No, I didn't dislike it because it was animated, or terribly devoid of car chases.
Yes, I think I'm perfectly aware on why you didn't like it by now.

ExaltedK9 said:
Transformers was ok
Yeah... Let's stop here. I think that says enough about you.

Good day.
 

The Human Torch

New member
Sep 12, 2010
750
0
0
Cars seem to be the movie mostly rated down, so I will go with that. Not sure what to think about the negative comments on The Incredibles, I actually think of that as the best movie in the Pixar stable.