blackrave said:
Strazdas said:
Legality is not a single line. There are appropriate punishment for appropriate crimes (unless were talking piracy, where according to law it deserves more punishment than murder by rape).
You are looking for logic in regulation created by monopolistic content holders for thier own subjective gain. There is no logic behind antipiracy laws. The tendency is for them to get even more crazy as time goes by (as proven by the "we havent made enough money of mickey mouse yet" act that extended copyright to life+95 years.
Might I ask what are you referring to?
In my country copyright is extended only 75 years after death of the author
Also why 95, why not 100? 100 makes a bit more sense (from mathematical point of view).
Your profile says you live in Antarctica, it has no copyright laws.
In US it used to be life+25 [http://old.cni.org/docs/infopols/US.Universal.Copyright.Conv.html]
Then it turned to 50 years after publication, then recently as Mickey Mouse was about to enter public domain a bunch of Hollywood studios lobbied in the law that extended (and allowed backward copyright claim even for works already in public domain!) and now it is life+70 or 95 after publication. Why 95.... good question, but ive seen a few countries use that.
Their main argument was that mickey mouse entering public domain would no longer allow thme to hold monopolic strnagehold on mickey mouse character and thus ruin american culture (no, seriously). It was good enough argument to rob libraries of 45 years of art.
you cna see the long list here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries%27_copyright_lengths