purf said:
Didn't want to come across condescending or something, but you see, if you say "bird" or "red", then we both know what you're talking about. If you say, for example, "dubstep", you could refer to the aforementioned James Blake or to some unrelated funfair music to ride bumber cars by.
Fair enough.
Though I posit this thought. If both represent dubstep, and James Blake is of higher quality (as I assume you suggest by your comparison), certainly there is value in the "funfair" tune despite it's apparent inferiority. Even if what it provides is a list of "don'ts". Yes?
It would say, "This is also dubstep, but it shows how the elements of the genre can be poorly implemented."
Ultimately, that becomes an aspect of taste and preference. I've heard some funfair music that was quite... well... fun.
But I digress. This is also why I asked for samples, if people were willing.