I don't have an issue with creepy imagery, but when it repeats, its just.... Yeah, I'm sure your argument was worth it... Yeah.... It just keeps repeating..JezebelinHell said:Well yours is boring so I am not reading your crusading posts anymore. Nice thing is I won't miss anything that could be pertinent to the topic. Wow, I feel so mature. I shall have to be affected by images more in the future.Aprilgold said:Ok, sorry, your avatar creeped me out too much to read on, I'm sure it was interesting and filled with great points, this account was a recent one, old E-mail got hacked, damn that, but whatever, sure it was full of great points though.
Ok, I'll get this right off the bat, it was an example, exagerated, but still an example. Does it matter how, overly exagerated of an example it is, and I didn't know the numbers, I knew it was hurting, anyways, thanks for the point out of my exageration.Kair said:Before I say anything else, 100 dollars per ad per person? Each ad may have a 1% chance of actually influencing a person to buy a product. The profit from each influenced could be, let's say 20 dollars. You are then spending 100 dollars for a 1% chance of gaining 20 dollars, or 10 000 dollars to gain 20 dollars. That is a 9980 dollar deficit. I may have misunderstood you, but that just seems ridiculous. The revenue generation from each ad is much smaller than you think.Aprilgold said:I've pointed this out previously, watching that ad gives money to the shows that YOU are watching or reading, and keeps these forums up to standard, would you rather not have these shows have gotten off the ground they did, and be hired by a company, gaining fans and being paid so they can continue to make people happy, and to make people enjoy life more? Think about this, if you worked for this company, and if half [about HALF of the people are using ad blocker, just go with it] are not viewing ads, and lets say you get 100$ per ad played on a computer, this means that, oh, I don't know, 40,000$ are NOT being paid to people within the company that need it to live daily, how would you like it.Kair said:Yes, because forcing me to watch advertisement has such great use-value.
Why not tell me to take loans so the banks will make money?
And now I say what I was going to say. That groups of people need ads to support their generation of use-value is moronic to start with. I refuse to argue within the confines of an unjust and impractical society.