mmm got that much thoWomplord said:He was being sarcastic. He said that they should have just restrained him with their bare hands.duchaked said:lol yeah I was gonna say...pretty sure a taser and rubber bullets hurt pretty darn bad tooBags159 said:Wait, pepper spray hurts but tasers don't? So do people just lie about tasers then?spartan231490 said:FUCK NO!!! HE'S EIGHT! You grab him and hold him down, you don't hit him with pepper spray. Why not use a taser or rubber bullets? Jesus, is it that hard to restrain an eight year old. I've held down kids a lot older than eight who tried to hit me with a stick. It's not even fucking hard. these officers should be jailed, after being pepper sprayed themselves. I mean, they did it to the poor kid twice. Once I could maybe except as just bad decision making and stupidity, but twice is either negligence or cruelty and absolutely unacceptable.Saucycardog said:http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/42449949/ns/today-today_people/
What do you guys think? Was this justified or totally not needed?
Completely justified IMO.
just all in a different kind of way as far as the pain goes
See...there american law system is a patch work, so it depends on the local government. And I am will to guess the first responder cops were just trying to end this the fastest most effective way without getting in shit later. So the opted for pepper spray. This one of those back against the wall situations that no matter what they did they would get in shit. If they jumped him, people would be like why did the cops need to do that to an 8 year old. If they waited, someone could have gotten hurt. If they tazed him, same mess. If they shot him, same mess...well probably worse. So they did what they thought was right at the time.EonEire said:Again (this will be my second time) I won't jump in making assumptions about the American Law System, but are the police actually allowed touch the kid? As in physical contact with no parents present? Or was the pepper spray the only way to actually "deal" with the situation.
I've had pepper-spray in the eyes. It sucks and made me want to not resist. So yeah, if some kid was throwing chairs at me, I would totally pepper spray him. And if a kid threw a ball through my window, I would make him and his parents pay for it.Sanglyon said:I believe that every proponent of pepper spray as "an harmless way to restrain an 8 year old" should be pepper-sprayed himself to experience what it feels like, because from experience, people like that have no clue of what real pain is. And if they keep on saying it's still "harmless", give them psychiatric counseling. Because anyone thinking it's ok to use this kind of treatment on a kid half their size "because he has a stick and was threatening to kill" has serious moral and mental issue. What would they do if a 5 years old throw a ball through their window? Set a rotweiller on him?
Yeah it sucks and it hurts, which is the point. But after you wash it out and get some fresh air, you are fine in an hour or so depend on how much you got and your tolerance for spicy food.teknoarcanist said:If you've ever been pepper-sprayed, you understand that this is not a huge deal. It hurts, but it's a lot safer than if the officers had tried to manhandle the kid to the ground -- who the hell knows what might have happened. Sounds like they responded appropriately given their training and the circumstances.
And we get back to the real problem, how the hell do you restrain an angry 8 year old that has a history with rage issues flailing about all over the place with no real training for subduing kids while not hurting him? I don't doubt at all that the cop could have slapped the stick of the kid and put him on the floor, but the clincher comes in if he either applies too much strength (again, no real training for taking down kids that I know of) and hurts the kid for real (cry about pepper spray all you want, but a broken bone is a shit ton nastier) or even fall on the kid because of a fuck up. Basically, yes, I do not know how pepper spray feels, but I'd dare say it's "cleaner" in the sense that it cuts the bullshit and reduces the chances of a freak accident happening on both sides of the confrontation. Also, this may be causing a huge media outcry, but if that child had bruises and god forbid, a sprained ankle or even worse, a broken bone, he'd be in a shit storm of epic proportions. It's a whole other animal how we got to that point and if there was a clear try to use diplomacy.Sanglyon said:I believe that every proponent of pepper spray as "an harmless way to restrain an 8 year old" should be pepper-sprayed himself to experience what it feels like, because from experience, people like that have no clue of what real pain is. And if they keep on saying it's still "harmless", give them psychiatric counseling. Because anyone thinking it's ok to use this kind of treatment on a kid half their size "because he has a stick and was threatening to kill" has serious moral and mental issue. What would they do if a 5 years old throw a ball through their window? Set a rotweiller on him?
that's ridiculous. I understand that teachers are not allowed to hit children but in a school for children with "issues" it seems ridiculous that they just run away as soon as the children act out.ace_of_something said:In pretty much every part of the 1st world teachers are not allowed to restrain a student, they're taught to take the other students and run.Zorg Machine said:wait, wait, wait...the teachers ran away and hid in a cupboard...from an 8-year old? If he wasn't armed with a knife or worse I don't see why the teachers couldn't handle it.
Also, I don't buy that the cops had no other option than to pepper spray him. They could have taked him down and only used the pepper spray if the kid charged them.
Because people are litigious. Hell a lot of schools can't even give kids detention any more.
pepper-spray can be lethal (especially to a child) if the target is allergic and any injuries a child would get from struggling they could just as easily get from writhing in pain.Dense_Electric said:snipp
Short answer, i'm the kinda nerd who stopped playing video games and went out and turned the world into one that was in my favor.HG131 said:I'm finding myself very confused. You insult nerds while on The Escapist, but you aren't any of the assholes who joined just for MM. It's a very confusing thing.Levitas1234 said:really?HG131 said:The kid was trying to KILL two people. I think they would have been justified if they snapped his arms and legs.
I find this funny, i could imagine all the teachers scared shitless of the little 8 year old, the teachers could of handled it themselves if they weren't so incompetent (lock themselves in a closet, what a joke) those teachers were probably good for nothing nerds anyways who thought they were king of the world.
bdcjacko said:Levitas1234 said:he locked them in the roombdcjacko said:That is what they did...Levitas1234 said:HG131 said:The kid was trying to KILL two people. I think they would have been justified if they snapped his arms and legs.
If i were a teacher, i'd just walk out of the room and lock him in