Police shoot an "armed" middle school student

darksakul

Old Man? I am not that old .....
Jun 14, 2008
629
0
0
It is why my state [Maryland] has the silhouette law.
The law basically states anything that can look like a gun, roughly shape like or confused for a gun can be treated as a real (and loaded) gun by police.

Even if it is dark, your far away and you got to squint a little to distort the shape some more so the object in question looks more gun like.

Protip: Do not ever yell threats in a back ally in Baltimore at night while holding a Banana.
Cops (as well as any/everyone else) will shoot you
 

Makon

New member
Jul 9, 2008
171
0
0
AnotherAvatar said:
Someone who would do what? Have a mental break down due to unknown pressures and cry out for help with an absurd stunt? Yes, I do think that a cops life, which at no point during this event was on the line, should be put on the line for someone who does something like that. I am SURE that it is in an oath they swear when the get the badge and the gun.

Not a single person's life was in danger here except for the boy who is now dead, the simple fact was he WASN'T going to kill anyone because he couldn't, he didn't come equipped to kill anyone. He was acting out, and it was stupid, and he's a total prick, but he didn't deserve to die, and if those cops were real men they would have put on swat gear and rushed him rather than capping him three times and toe tagging him. Did anyone try and talk the kid down? Was there a negotiator or a psychologist sent in to deal with him?

I can tell you right now, if I were a cop on the scene my first question would be if anyone heard shots, if they hadn't (and trust me when I say the sound a real gun makes is very distinct from a pellet gun, regardless of how it looks) I would suit up myself, as much as possible and I would give rushing him a go and risk my life as it IS THE JOB. That's why cops WERE given so much glory in the old days, and why that's faded in recent years as they've started placing themselves above the people.

I'm not saying cops should let themselves get killed, they should protect themselves with the absurd defense budget they've been given, but I am most certainly saying they shouldn't murder people they aren't even sure are armed.

That's just insane.
...You have obviously not read a single thing in the article or in this threat.

1: "They're lives were in no way on the line". They didn't know that. At all. They saw what appeared to be a live weapon being waved at them and in the surrounding area by a suspect saying he was going to "kill everybody", after ignoring repeated warnings to lower his weapon. They're lives do NOT boil down to 'dying for you'. They are men and women too, they have family, parents, sons and daughters at home. While yes, their duty by putting on that uniform is to protect innocent citizens, they are under no obligations to get themselves killed because "they didn't know it wasn't real". The officers there already have to live with the knowledge they shot and killed a minor, but the idea that they would have had to theoretically wait until one of their own is possibly dead in order to act is ludicrous.

2: "The kid wasn't ANY danger at all, and if the cops were real men, they would have slapped on SWAT gear and rushed him". Lay off the action movies and their theatrics, why don't you? They already didn't know the gun was fake. On top of that, 'rushing' an armed suspect in a crowded building is extremely stupid. If the gun was real, he could have shot fellow officers, the officer rushing him (ballistics armor ISN'T invulnerability), or civilians in one of the class rooms.

They already told the suspect (I refuse to call him a 'kid', at 15 he was damn well old enough to know what he was doing) to drop the weapon multiple times, only leaving him waiving a seemingly real weapon at officers and civilians, talking about how he was going to kill them. He refused those warnings and he paid the price. When you have a situation that unfolds as rapidly as this one seemingly did, you don't have time to bring in negotiators or psychiatrists, who are not even remotely a guaranteed answer to the situation.

Also, if you honestly don't think those cops were 'real men', either go sign yourself up for the force or enlist in the military, see how well you last. It took guts to make the call that they did, so either literally put yourself in their boots or cut them some slack.

3: 'If you were a cop on the scene'. Well guess what, you weren't. They were the ones there, on the other hand, and they followed their training and duty to the letter. 'Rushing' suspects is a tactic only ever seen in Hollywood 'maverick cop' glorification movies, there are real reasons why it isn't used by the actual police force. As to it being 'their job', their job is to protect innocent citizens and bring themselves home to their families, not die trying to ensure the safety of an armed suspect. Also, I'm not sure what country you live in, but their 'defense budget' is pathetic, leading to department cuts, underfunding for basic equipment and staffing, and even patrol route cuts. It's the military that gets the crazy 'defense budget'.
 

jimbob123432

New member
Apr 8, 2011
245
0
0
ElPatron said:
jimbob123432 said:
Also, "a semi-auto pistol is not as big a threat as a full-auto rifle"? Ummm... Last time I checked, a .223 (a round a lot of recreated rifles use) is smaller than a .45 round (a standard pistol round). Sure, the distance the rifle can cover is larger, but at the point that that will matter, the cops won't be using pistols.
The .45 ACP is known for being heavy and slow. It's a good man-stopper. When you are talking about pistol calibers, anything at least as powerful as 9x19mm is adequate. 9x19 has the advantage of speed over .45 ACP, but it is still quite slow.

5.56x45 (and not .223 because it is more oriented for civilian use and thus it is rated for lower pressures) will be shot out of a 20in barrel at around 3100 feet per second.
Yes, you are right, except for one thing. The reason I brought .223 and not 5.56 rounds is because I was talking about civilian firearms, not police firearms. Now, coming from Canada, I'm not sure how military replicas are made in the US, but up here most of our AR-15 replicas and whatnot are chambered in .223 because they don't pose as much of a threat as a pistol round, a point which you made quite nicely. A .223 round has much less of a chance of penetrating a Kevlar vest than a .45 round or a 9mm. Also, you seemed to have missed where I said "Sure, the distance the rifle can cover is larger, but at the point that that will matter , the cops won't be using pistols". If faced with a sniper situation, or any another non-CQC situation, the police would more than likely deploy a tactical team with longer-range weaponry.
I agree with most of the arguments you made, however you made arguments about a bullet that I wasn't talking about . A 5.56 round is extremely deadly, but a .223 is a fairly weak round.
 

Arizona Kyle

New member
Aug 25, 2010
371
0
0
ThreeWords said:
Zack Alklazaris said:
I'm also wondering if this was a suicide by cop.
Jaime's best friend, 16-year-old Star Rodriguez, said her favorite memory was when Jaime came to her party Dec. 29 and they danced and sang together.

"He was like a brother to me," she said.
There's your answer: dude thought he was in there with a close friend, danced with her on New Years, then got told he was 'like a brother'

I think I know who's fault this is.
Alright now now lets not go blaming the women
 

ServebotFrank

New member
Jul 1, 2010
627
0
0
Smeggs said:
I could have sworn cops were trained to aim for the arms or legs over the torso/head unless the threat was totally evident, such as they were being fired upon already or there was a hostage situation. Guess not.

Yeah, excessive force, but then again the kid was given multiple oppurtunities, felt like being an idiot and got confrontational with the guys with real guns, and he paid for it in the largest way possible.

How did I know it'd be in Texas?
What? Cops are trained to hit the center mass, the target with the LEAST chance of missing. You watch too many movies if you think that shots like that are as possible as they seem. Leg shots are still fatal (major arteries) and arms are way too hard to hit.

Also it is NOT excessive force no smart cop would meet lethal force with non-lethal force, you're asking for the impossible. Also cops are not trained to fire when fired upon they are trained to fire to protect civilian lives. You don't wait until after you start shooting because someone could die. Standard protocol is if a gun is pointed at you or another person you open fire immediately.

There are plenty of people who tried what you suggested and they either endangered innocent lives or died when the best option would've been to just shoot the assailant. Look up cases where cops tried shooting the leg or arm and ended up dying. There are alot.
 

Belated

New member
Feb 2, 2011
586
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
"Border town"? You think this is a video game or something? I don't care what kind of town it is. Kid is a kid, cop is a cop. And a kid is DEFINITELY not running a drug cartel. I don't know why you think cartels make a difference in this debate. And you have no idea if negotiations would've worked or not. You weren't there. I see no reason why negotiations wouldn't have worked. Words don't magically lose their meaning just because people feel scared.
 

jimbob123432

New member
Apr 8, 2011
245
0
0
usmarine4160 said:
jimbob123432 said:
A .223 round has much less of a chance of penetrating a Kevlar vest than a .45 round or a 9mm.
That is completely wrong, kevlar vests without ceramic plates will stop pistol rounds because pistol rounds are not designed for penetration and flatten out on impact to transfer maximum kinetic energy transfer to the target (kevlar is designed to absorb this energy). Without sapi plates a vest will not even slow down a .223
What I meant by "Kevlar" was Type IIA or Type II body armour (which protects against .22, .223, and .45 ACP rounds), but I didn;t think anyone would understand what I meant by it so I used Kevlar instead. Thank you for the correction.

Link to source: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/223054.pdf
 

ThreeWords

New member
Feb 27, 2009
5,179
0
0
Arizona Kyle said:
ThreeWords said:
Zack Alklazaris said:
I'm also wondering if this was a suicide by cop.
Jaime's best friend, 16-year-old Star Rodriguez, said her favorite memory was when Jaime came to her party Dec. 29 and they danced and sang together.

"He was like a brother to me," she said.
There's your answer: dude thought he was in there with a close friend, danced with her on New Years, then got told he was 'like a brother'

I think I know who's fault this is.
Alright now now lets not go blaming the women
If he'd been gay, I'd be blaming a man. This isn't about gender, this is about matters of the heart gone tragically wrong!
 

Spawkuring

New member
May 2, 2008
14
0
0
It's pretty ironic how the most disturbing posts are by the people who accuse Americans of being disturbing.

Seriously, it's amazing how people keep bashing the police in this situation for being "excessive" and not using an "alternate solution", yet these alternate solutions always seem to be one of the following:

- "Use warning shots/shoot to injure!" (Both of which are Hollywood fantasies that are impractical and dangerous to use in real life)
- "Use non-lethal weapons!" (Non-lethal weapons are only good when the criminals are less armed than you. If they have a gun, you meet with equal or greater force, never less)
- "Wait for the kid to actually shoot first!" (And if the kid's bullet hits someone, we end up with two dead people instead of one, and these posters have the gall to accuse us of being the barbaric ones)
- "Try to negotiate first!" (The police did precisely that. They warned him repeatedly and he did not listen, and even went on to point the gun at them. That's more than enough reason to assume he's a deadly threat)
- "He's only 15!" (Kids his age used to go into WAR for christ's sake, so I don't know where people get the idea that 15 year olds are incapable of handling weapons or performing acts of violence, especially since information on school shootings are just a google search away.)

Seriously though, the whole reason why cops use lethal force is because it is the most reliable way of neutralizing a potentially lethal threat. When a person shows every intention of being lethal, cops should never take chances. It's amazing how so many people suggest that cops should simply rely on gambling their lives and take large, unreliable risks for no reason. If you live in a country that doesn't have to deal with large gangs and Mexican drug cartels, then be thankful. But don't assume that America is the same way. Criminals are dangerous as all hell here, and we can't take chances when innocent lives are at risk.
 

Belated

New member
Feb 2, 2011
586
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
Belated said:
Ultratwinkie said:
"Border town"? You think this is a video game or something? I don't care what kind of town it is. Kid is a kid, cop is a cop. And a kid is DEFINITELY not running a drug cartel. I don't know why you think cartels make a difference in this debate. And you have no idea if negotiations would've worked or not. You weren't there. I see no reason why negotiations wouldn't have worked. Words don't magically lose their meaning just because people feel scared.
Negotiations don't work when its confrontation. You either:
A) do what you're told.
B) Get hurt and imprisoned.
C) Die (if armed).
Okay, this isn't part of my argument, but on the side I gotta say, out of context these lines are extremely creepy. In fact, even in context it's pretty creepy.

Now I don't know what your qualifications are. But if you've been a cop, you probably haven't been a psychologist. And if you've been a psychologist, you probably haven't been a cop. So either you don't know how cops operate, or you don't know that negotiations won't work. Pick one or the other.

It's true that "some men just want to watch the world burn", but most people are looking for something. I still see no reason the cops couldn't have tried talking first. Yes, they have to deal with cartels and crime all the time. But that's no excuse. The kid wasn't a cartel. It wasn't the same situation. Not being able to adjust on a case-by-case basis is just laziness, and you're making excuses for that laziness. If the cops always behave the same way without ever applying individual reasoning to it, they're no better than robots. And that's a pretty abysmal existence.

If that is indeed the system our police operate under, then it's a pretty shite system and in need of reform. Crime isn't black and white, so neither should be the responses to it.
 

Grant Hobba

New member
Aug 30, 2010
269
0
0
well .... goes to show... don't bring a gun to school.... even a fake one, nor do you point it at police... as soon as that happens... they have every right to protect.
 

ChadSexington

New member
Apr 14, 2011
179
0
0
davros3000 said:
The Police seem to keep forgetting that they are paid to die for us if necessary.
What? No they're not, that's stupid. Put some serious thought into what you just said.

OT: The cops did what they were paid to do, they potentially stopped a murderer.
 

Mau95

Senior Member
Nov 11, 2011
347
0
21
Dude, I saw an article about a man being shot by the police because he was holding a "realistic" water gun in a playground. People do weird things, it's just ridiculous.
 

Reiterpallasch

New member
Sep 27, 2010
42
0
0
http://www.kapowwe.com/mm5/graphics/00000001/str70.jpg

Remove or paint over the orange tip? Looks pretty real from a distance.
And yes, that's a picture of a water gun.

Frankly, such situations scream "suicide-by-cop"
 

Reiterpallasch

New member
Sep 27, 2010
42
0
0
Frankly, all of the arguments in this thread so far that decry the cops' actions are rooted in fantasy at best and astoundingly ignorant at worst.
The only one that comes close to making a lick of sense is the rubber bullets position, but even that one stands on some really shaky ground.
The officers were completely justified in their actions, and frankly, the fact that the teen was only shot 3 times shows some remarkable restraint on the part of the officers involved.

Captcha: hthopu was

wat