Poll: 3rd person or 1st person? (getting to choose)

AmericanWarMachine

New member
Sep 7, 2008
87
0
0
Ever played a game and thought, "Man! This game is awesome! But it would be so much better if it was (3rd/1st) person."? I know I have... on many games. So the question is: Do you believe that all games should give the option to switch in between the two?
 

mjhhiv

New member
Jun 22, 2008
758
0
0
'Twas definitely a good idea in Oblivion. I say, sure it would be great.
 

meatloaf231

Old Man Glenn
Feb 13, 2008
2,248
0
0
Crap. I voted yes.

The problem with having two camera angles is that one of them is always completely useless.
 

CTU_Agent24

New member
May 21, 2008
529
0
0
No, It never works, think of the 'Hitman' Games, 3rd person is great, but when u switch to 1st, not nearly as good. Don't get me wrong, i like both 3rd and 1st person, but you shouldn't be able to switch. Just stick to one.
 

Monkfish Acc.

New member
May 7, 2008
4,102
0
0
If you put both in, everyone's happy.
Also, they get two tries at making good camera angles. That way we can totally rip on them if they screw both up.
 

scoobyduped

New member
Apr 6, 2008
228
0
0
I'm not voting, because it depends. First person wouldn't work with Gears of War. Third person wouldn't work with Call of Duty, or Half Life. But switching worked well in the Star Wars Battlefront games, and could have worked with Halo, since it switched to third person when you used vehicles and turrets anyway. I probably would still have used the first person option, but it could've worked.

Oh, and games that switch perspectives for stuff like a cover system (I'm looking at you Rainbow 6: Vegas 2), should either be third person to begin with, ditch the cover system, or actually work on a functional first person cover system.
 

Aeviv

New member
Jun 13, 2008
166
0
0
Some games it works, some it doesnt. I think the only games ive liked being able to swap are Morrowind, Oblivion, Star Wars Battlefront
 

Meliz

New member
Apr 9, 2008
52
0
0
meatloaf231 post=9.70897.707449 said:
Crap. I voted yes.

The problem with having two camera angles is that one of them is always completely useless.
vampire: the masquerade
bloodlines

thus, your claim has been refuted.
 

Lilim

New member
Sep 10, 2008
15
0
0
I actually like first persons games best as a rule. I like a 3rd person game here and there, but I prefer the first person perspective. That said, I also love RPGs. Too many RPGs that go for a first person perspective suck. Dark messiah of Might and Magic got the first person combat right, but, other than that ended up being pretty shallow. Vampire the Masquerade was great fun, but forced you into 3rd person for Melee combat, and it was buggy as hell. Oblivion and Morrowind both had horrible first person combat...

I'd like to see a First Person RPG with Morrowind level open environments Oblivion's being able to interact with almost any object, Gothic II Night of the Raven's challenge/advancement system (you don't select a class to be at the beginning, you actually have to join work your way up the food chain to join your preferred 'profession' and learn their ways and become the class over the course of the game), Planescape Torment and BGII: Shadow of Amn level story and character interaction, Dark Messiah of Might and Magic's first person melee combat and bow/arrow combat and a magic system that combined the Quest for Glory series spells with Oblivion's spell effect manipulation (creating your own spells) with Gothic IIs magic and Guild War's magic, then follow that up with Half Life 2 level animations and voice acting and the lip syncing facial expression technology therein, along with a massive fully interactive with fully realized LIVING cities and people and completely destructible/deformable/movable/physics enabled EVERYTHING and I mean EVERYTHING.

That said I'd want the actual graphics kept stylized and artistic, not realistic. Something like Guild War's concept art... not how Guild Wars the game looked, but its concept art, a game that looked like a painting... such as things like:

http://news.filefront.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/guildwars_petrifiedtree.jpg

and

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/57/177145844_f15c61dc21.jpg

and

http://2black.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/crabfort.jpg

and

http://guildwars.incgamers.com/gallery/data/526/concept3.jpg

and

http://guildwars.gameamp.com/modules/gallery/uploads/23237.jpg

and

http://guildwars.incgamers.com/gallery/data/526/concept2.jpg
 

Mukiwa

New member
Sep 4, 2008
123
0
0
I'd like a radical new option, 5th person - you control your character in the usual way but all you see on screen is a friend of a friend who heard some rumours from a guy in the pub about your character's actions and then attempts to describe them to you while swigging whiskey(this allows for a gradually increasing difficulty level).
Now that's innovation.
 

Atrer

New member
Jul 17, 2008
75
0
0
King wiL post=9.70897.715756 said:
mjhhiv post=9.70897.707446 said:
'Twas definitely a good idea in Oblivion. I say, sure it would be great.
I agree it was sweet in Oblivion
Sure if the third person character models look better than Oblivions. In movements I mean, none of that strange sliding around.
 

ccdistancerunner

New member
Sep 11, 2008
191
0
0
Star Wars Battlefront 1 and 2 had the option of switching and i've always prefered 3rd person because it gives a better idea of your position realitive to enemies
 

Spartan Bannana

New member
Apr 27, 2008
3,032
0
0
It was a good idea in Oblivion, 1st for the bulk of the game, and 3rd for steering horses
And honestly I don't see why more games don't do this, it's an easy edition and it's always nice to have a choice.