His question asked if the world would be better if we all thought the same way. He didn't ask anything about happiness.FernandoV said:I don't see that as part of his question. In terms of happiness, when people agree on something, and everyone is doing what is agreed is best, everyone is happy. Basic stuff. It doesn't matter if everyone just agreed to kill a puppy on the 3rd of every month.blaqknoise said:No. You can't really move forward if everyone thinks the same thing.
That sounds like it could be a movie. I'd say get a patent before WB takes that one down to the bank!LilithSlave said:To me, for something like that to happen, you'd need something to create that hivemind like a machine that would fuse our brains while our opinions duke it out until one comes out on topic. And who knows what trains of logic would cause all logic to die.
People progress out of the desire to make themselves happy. As far as I'm concerned, if stopping at the invention of fire meant everyone everywhere was happy forever then we won.blaqknoise said:His question asked if the world would be better if we all thought the same way. He didn't ask anything about happiness.FernandoV said:I don't see that as part of his question. In terms of happiness, when people agree on something, and everyone is doing what is agreed is best, everyone is happy. Basic stuff. It doesn't matter if everyone just agreed to kill a puppy on the 3rd of every month.blaqknoise said:No. You can't really move forward if everyone thinks the same thing.
I must agree with blaqknoise, do you remember during the dark ages where all (or most) think alike by the christian religion. Any new ideas or technology would be rejected by the millions and called "devil work". Even though the millions of people were happy back then, We could have found a cure for aids or cancer by now.FernandoV said:People progress out of the desire to make themselves happy. As far as I'm concerned, if stopping at the invention of fire meant everyone everywhere was happy forever then we won.blaqknoise said:His question asked if the world would be better if we all thought the same way. He didn't ask anything about happiness.FernandoV said:I don't see that as part of his question. In terms of happiness, when people agree on something, and everyone is doing what is agreed is best, everyone is happy. Basic stuff. It doesn't matter if everyone just agreed to kill a puppy on the 3rd of every month.blaqknoise said:No. You can't really move forward if everyone thinks the same thing.
No I don't remember because I wasn't alive then but I am aware of the situation at that time. Trust when I say people were definitely not happy, Christianity only allowed them to tolerate their terrible situation. If everyone was happy with the same situation then there would be no need for progress. Why is there a need for cures? Because people hate cancer. If everyone was cool with cancer then who cares about progress?Blue2 said:I must agree with blaqknoise, do you remember during the dark ages where all (or most) think alike by the christian religion. Any new ideas or technology would be rejected by the millions and called "devil work". Even though the millions of people were happy back then, We could have found a cure for aids or cancer by now.FernandoV said:People progress out of the desire to make themselves happy. As far as I'm concerned, if stopping at the invention of fire meant everyone everywhere was happy forever then we won.blaqknoise said:His question asked if the world would be better if we all thought the same way. He didn't ask anything about happiness.FernandoV said:I don't see that as part of his question. In terms of happiness, when people agree on something, and everyone is doing what is agreed is best, everyone is happy. Basic stuff. It doesn't matter if everyone just agreed to kill a puppy on the 3rd of every month.blaqknoise said:No. You can't really move forward if everyone thinks the same thing.