thedoclc post=18.73797.810787 said:
Blind Punk Riot post=18.73797.810783 said:
I'm sorry, but if any of you go to school still, or college, or university.
Please ask your teacher/tutor this question.
Write the question down word for word and show them it.
They will say 50% and laugh at you, depending on how mean they are.
And they would be wrong.
Seriously, Riot.
How can you just say that everybody should be entitled to his/her own opinions, then blatantly say that everybody NOT saying 50% is wrong?
Also, WE HAVE EXPLAINED IT.
READ IT. TRY TO UNDERSTAND IT.
This will be my last post in here, because some people simply can't think for themselves and go with the mob, and this is simply infuriating me.
Just ADMIT that you're wrong for a change, there's NOTHING wrong with that.
Am I being a hypocrite now? No. This is math, not ethics. Math is an exact science: this means that there is one answer, and ONLY one, if you're asking a simple question, at least. 1+1 is not either 2 or 3, it clearly is 2.
I understand the matter of this question, I understand the answer, and professors have calculated this and say this is a fact.
SO.
2 dogs. 4 possibilities:
1) A is male, B is female
2) A is female, B is male
3) A is male, B is male
4) A is female, B is female.
Shopkeeper says that 1 dog is male.
What most people do at this point, is assign the 'male' attribute to Dog A automatically, taking only options 1 and 3 for their 1/2 solution. (That includes you)
It is however, never said that Dog A is that male. The option that Dog A is female, and Dog B was the male the shopkeeper talked about, still exists and should NOT be discarded.
So the only real option that is tossed out the window, is option 4.
In the remaining 3 options, namely:
1) A is male, B is female
2) A is female, B is male
3) A is male, B is male
Only one suits the male-male bill. ONE. Out of. THREE.